Literature DB >> 26694228

Signaling Responses After Varying Sequencing of Strength and Endurance Training in a Fed State.

Thomas W Jones, Ian H Walshe, David L Hamilton, Glyn Howatson, Mark Russell, Oliver J Price, Alan St Clair Gibson, Duncan N French.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare anabolic signaling responses to differing sequences of concurrent strength and endurance training in a fed state.
METHODS: Eighteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to the following experimental conditions: strength training (ST), strength followed by endurance training (ST-END), or endurance followed by strength training (END-ST). Muscle tissue samples were taken from the vastus lateralis before each exercise protocol, on cessation of exercise, and 1 h after cessation of strength training. Tissue was analyzed for total and phosphorylated (p-) signaling proteins linked to the mTOR and AMPK networks.
RESULTS: Strength-training performance was similar between ST, ST-END, and END-ST. p-S6k1 was elevated from baseline 1 h posttraining in ST and ST-END (both P < .05). p-4E-BP1 was significantly lower than baseline post-ST (P = .01), whereas at 1 h postexercise in the ST-END condition p-4E-BP1 was significantly greater than postexercise (P = .04). p-ACC was elevated from baseline both postexercise and 1 h postexercise (both P < .05) in the END-ST condition. AMPK, mTOR, p38, PKB, and eEF2 responded similarly to ST, ST-END, and END-ST. Signaling responses to ST, ST-END, and END were largely similar. As such it cannot be ascertained which sequence of concurrent strength and endurance training is most favorable in promoting anabolic signaling.
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of the current study an acute bout of concurrent training of differing sequences elicited similar responses of the AMPK and mTOR networks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMPK; anabolic signaling; combined exercise; exercise order; mTOR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26694228     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  6 in total

Review 1.  Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract?

Authors:  Vernon G Coffey; John A Hawley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Aerobic exercise intensity does not affect the anabolic signaling following resistance exercise in endurance athletes.

Authors:  T W Jones; L Eddens; J Kupusarevic; D C M Simoes; M J W Furber; K A van Someren; G Howatson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  The Role of Intra-Session Exercise Sequence in the Interference Effect: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lee Eddens; Ken van Someren; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Similar Adaptations to 10 Weeks Concurrent Training on Metabolic Markers and Physical Performance in Young, Adult, and Older Adult Women.

Authors:  David C Andrade; Marcelo Flores-Opazo; Luis Peñailillo; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Johnattan Cano-Montoya; Jaime A Vásquez-Gómez; Cristian Alvarez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  A Brief Review on Concurrent Training: From Laboratory to the Field.

Authors:  Spyridon Methenitis
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 6.  Acute and Long-Term Effects of Concurrent Resistance and Swimming Training on Swimming Performance.

Authors:  Gavriil Arsoniadis; Petros Botonis; Gregory C Bogdanis; Gerasimos Terzis; Argyris Toubekis
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.