| Literature DB >> 26693953 |
Hans Jörg Bachmann1, Thomas D Bucheli1, Alba Dieguez-Alonso2, Daniele Fabbri3, Heike Knicker4, Hans-Peter Schmidt5, Axel Ulbricht6, Roland Becker7, Alessandro Buscaroli3, Diane Buerge1, Andrew Cross8, Dane Dickinson8, Akio Enders9, Valdemar I Esteves10, Michael W H Evangelou11, Guido Fellet12, Kevin Friedrich13, Gabriel Gasco Guerrero14, Bruno Glaser15, Ulrich M Hanke16, Kelly Hanley9, Isabel Hilber1, Dimitrios Kalderis17, Jens Leifeld1, Ondrej Masek8, Jan Mumme18, Marina Paneque Carmona4, Roberto Calvelo Pereira19, Frederic Rees20, Alessandro G Rombolà3, José Maria de la Rosa4, Ruben Sakrabani21, Saran Sohi8, Gerhard Soja22, Massimo Valagussa23, Frank Verheijen24, Franz Zehetner25.
Abstract
Biochar produced by pyrolysis of organic residues is increasingly used for soil amendment and many other applications. However, analytical methods for its physical and chemical characterization are yet far from being specifically adapted, optimized, and standardized. Therefore, COST Action TD1107 conducted an interlaboratory comparison in which 22 laboratories from 12 countries analyzed three different types of biochar for 38 physical-chemical parameters (macro- and microelements, heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pH, electrical conductivity, and specific surface area) with their preferential methods. The data were evaluated in detail using professional interlaboratory testing software. Whereas intralaboratory repeatability was generally good or at least acceptable, interlaboratory reproducibility was mostly not (20% < mean reproducibility standard deviation < 460%). This paper contributes to better comparability of biochar data published already and provides recommendations to improve and harmonize specific methods for biochar analysis in the future.Entities:
Keywords: biochar analysis; biochar certification; charcoal; heavy metals; interlaboratory test; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; round-robin test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26693953 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Agric Food Chem ISSN: 0021-8561 Impact factor: 5.279