Literature DB >> 26692536

Comparative efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis that inadequately responds to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Young Ho Lee1, Sang-Cheol Bae2.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of biologics and tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.
METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with RA that inadequately responds to TNF inhibitors.
RESULTS: Four RCTs including 1796 patients met the inclusion criteria. The tocilizumab 8 mg group showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than the abatacept and tofacitinib groups. Ranking probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tocilizumab 8 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.9863), followed by rituximab (SUCRA = 0.6623), abatacept (SUCRA = 0.5428), tocilizumab 4 mg (SUCRA = 0.4956), tofacitinib 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.4715), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.3415) and placebo (SUCRA = 0). In contrast, the safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly among the treatment options.
CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab 8 mg was the second-line non-TNF biologic with the highest performance regarding an early good response based on ACR20 response rate and acceptable safety profile, followed by rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with RA and an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapy, and none of these treatments were associated with a significant risk of withdrawal due to adverse events.
© 2015 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biologics; network meta-analysis; rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26692536     DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.12822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis        ISSN: 1756-1841            Impact factor:   2.454


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of posterior noninfectious uveitis : Current situation and future developments].

Authors:  U Pleyer; D Pohlmann; N Stübiger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Discontinuation of non-anti-TNF drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in interventional versus observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fernanda S Tonin; Laiza M Steimbach; Leticia P Leonart; Vinicius L Ferreira; Helena H Borba; Thais Piazza; Ariane G Araújo; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Roberto Pontarolo; Astrid Wiens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Factors influencing the choice of first- and second-line biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from the Italian LORHEN Registry.

Authors:  Sara Monti; Catherine Klersy; Roberto Gorla; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Fabiola Atzeni; Raffaele Pellerito; Enrico Fusaro; Giuseppe Paolazzi; Pier Andrea Rocchetta; Ennio Giulio Favalli; Antonio Marchesoni; Roberto Caporali
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety indicators of DMARDs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zunlian Wang; Min Huang; Bin Yu; Yilan Huang; Silin Zheng; Xuping Yang; Hong Ning
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Fungal Infections and New Biologic Therapies.

Authors:  Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Tom M Chiller
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  Comparative Efficacy (DAS28 Remission) of Targeted Immune Modulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennie H Best; Yuting Kuang; Yilin Jiang; Rajpal Singh; Andreas Karabis; Jennifer Uyei; Joseph Dang; William G Reiss
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of various anti-rheumatic treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kexun Ma; Ling Li; Chunhui Liu; Lingling Zhou; Xueping Zhou
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Reintroduction of immunosuppressive medications in pediatric rheumatology patients with histoplasmosis: a case series.

Authors:  Rachel A Brown; Fatima Barbar-Smiley; Cagri Yildirim-Toruner; Monica I Ardura; Stacy P Ardoin; Shoghik Akoghlanian
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Weiyan Cai; Youyi Gu; Huanqin Cui; Yinyin Cao; Xiaoliang Wang; Yi Yao; Mingyu Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Drug retention of 7 biologics and tofacitinib in biologics-naïve and biologics-switched patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study.

Authors:  Kosuke Ebina; Toru Hirano; Yuichi Maeda; Wataru Yamamoto; Motomu Hashimoto; Koichi Murata; Tohru Takeuchi; Hideyuki Shiba; Yonsu Son; Hideki Amuro; Akira Onishi; Kengo Akashi; Ryota Hara; Masaki Katayama; Keiichi Yamamoto; Atsushi Kumanogoh; Makoto Hirao
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.