Kristan S Worthington1,2, Luke A Wiley1, C Allan Guymon2, Aliasger K Salem3, Budd A Tucker1. 1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Wynn Institute for Vision Research, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa. 2. 2 Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa. 3. 3 Division of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cell replacement therapy for the treatment of retinal degeneration is an increasingly feasible approach, but one that still requires optimization of the transplantation strategy. To this end, various polymer substrates can increase cell survival and integration, although the effect of their pore size on cell behavior, particularly differentiation, has yet to be explored. METHODS: Salt crystals of varying known size were used to impart structure to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds by a salt leaching/solvent evaporation process. Mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs) were seeded to the polymer scaffolds and supplemented with retinal differentiation media for up to 2 weeks. Proliferation was measured during the course of 2 weeks, while differentiation was evaluated using cell morphology and expression of early retinal development markers. RESULTS: The salt leaching method of porous PLGA fabrication resulted in amorphous smooth pores. Cells attached to these scaffolds and proliferated, reaching a maximum cell number at 10 days postseeding that was 5 times higher on porous PLGA than on nonporous controls. The morphology of many of these cells, including their formation of neurites, was suggestive of neural phenotypes, while their expression of Sox2, Pax6, and Otx2 indicates early retinal development. CONCLUSIONS: The use of porous PLGA scaffolds to differentiate iPSCs to retinal phenotypes is a feasible pretransplantation approach. This adds to an important knowledge base; understanding how developing retinal cells interact with polymer substrates with varying structure is a crucial component of optimizing cell therapy strategies.
PURPOSE: Cell replacement therapy for the treatment of retinal degeneration is an increasingly feasible approach, but one that still requires optimization of the transplantation strategy. To this end, various polymer substrates can increase cell survival and integration, although the effect of their pore size on cell behavior, particularly differentiation, has yet to be explored. METHODS: Salt crystals of varying known size were used to impart structure to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds by a salt leaching/solvent evaporation process. Mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs) were seeded to the polymer scaffolds and supplemented with retinal differentiation media for up to 2 weeks. Proliferation was measured during the course of 2 weeks, while differentiation was evaluated using cell morphology and expression of early retinal development markers. RESULTS: The salt leaching method of porous PLGA fabrication resulted in amorphous smooth pores. Cells attached to these scaffolds and proliferated, reaching a maximum cell number at 10 days postseeding that was 5 times higher on porous PLGA than on nonporous controls. The morphology of many of these cells, including their formation of neurites, was suggestive of neural phenotypes, while their expression of Sox2, Pax6, and Otx2 indicates early retinal development. CONCLUSIONS: The use of porous PLGA scaffolds to differentiate iPSCs to retinal phenotypes is a feasible pretransplantation approach. This adds to an important knowledge base; understanding how developing retinal cells interact with polymer substrates with varying structure is a crucial component of optimizing cell therapy strategies.
Authors: R E MacLaren; R A Pearson; A MacNeil; R H Douglas; T E Salt; M Akimoto; A Swaroop; J C Sowden; R R Ali Journal: Nature Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins; Luan M Streb; Kristin Anfinson; Mari E Eyestone; Emily Kaalberg; Megan J Riker; Arlene V Drack; Terry A Braun; Edwin M Stone Journal: Elife Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Anai Gonzalez-Cordero; Emma L West; Rachael A Pearson; Yanai Duran; Livia S Carvalho; Colin J Chu; Arifa Naeem; Samuel J I Blackford; Anastasios Georgiadis; Jorn Lakowski; Mike Hubank; Alexander J Smith; James W B Bainbridge; Jane C Sowden; Robin R Ali Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-07-21 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Erin R Burnight; Joseph C Giacalone; Jessica A Cooke; Jessica R Thompson; Laura R Bohrer; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; John H Fingert; Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Emily E Kaalberg; Malia M Collins; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Brittni A Scruggs; Chunhua Jiao; Cathryn M Cranston; Emily Kaalberg; Kai Wang; Stephen R Russell; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Elliott H Sohn Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 6.940