| Literature DB >> 26692194 |
Mona Fouad Mahmoud1, Sara Zakaria1, Ahmed Fahmy1.
Abstract
The aims of the present work were to study the effects of chronic NO inhibition on liver cirrhosis and to analyze its relationship with liver and kidney damage markers. Two inhibitors of NO synthesis (inducible NO synthase (iNOS) inhibitor, aminoguanidine (AG), and nonselective NOS inhibitor, L-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME)) were administered for 6 weeks to bile duct ligated (BDL) rats 3 days after surgery. The present study showed that BDL was associated with liver injury and renal impairment. BDL increased liver NO content and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. This was corroborated by increased oxidative stress, TNF-α, TGF-1β, and MMP-13 genes overexpression. Although both drugs reduced NO synthesis and TNF-α gene overexpression, only AG improved renal dysfunction and liver damage and reduced liver oxidative stress. However, L-NAME exacerbated liver and renal dysfunction. Both drugs failed to modulate TGF-1β and MMP-13 genes overexpression. In conclusion, inhibition of NO production by constitutive nitric oxide synthase (cNOS) plays a crucial role in liver injury and renal dysfunction while inhibition of iNOS by AG has beneficial effect. TNF-α is not the main cytokine responsible for liver injury in BDL model. Nitric oxide inhibition did not stop the progression of cholestatic liver damage.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26692194 PMCID: PMC4673328 DOI: 10.1155/2015/298792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharmacol Sci ISSN: 1687-6334
Effect of different treatments on liver and renal functions of bile duct ligated rats.
| Treatment | Control | Sham | BDL | Aminoguanidine | L-NAME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT | 24.3 ± 1.8 | 56.1 | 1012# ± 6.4 | 290.2$ ± 3.5 | 1517$ ± 8.3 |
| AST | 126.3 ± 5.9 | 310.4 | 1379# ± 11.0 | 1102$ ± 5.3 | 1801$ ± 6.4 |
| LDH | 929.7 ± 6.9 | 1637 | 2607# ± 10.1 | 2050$ ± 18.8 | 2428$ ± 16.1 |
| T. bilirubin | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.08 ± 0.003 | 4.06# ± 0.1 | 3.51$ ± 0.04 | 6.07$ ± 0.07 |
| Urea | 11.8 ± 0.4 | 31.5 | 327.7# ± 3.8 | 172.4$ ± 2.7 | 516.4$ ± 5.8 |
| Creatinine | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.72 | 2.72# ± 0.06 | 1.95$ ± 0.06 | 2.78 ± 0.02 |
Data are presented as mean ± S.E., n = 6. Significantly different from control at P < 0.05, #significantly different from sham at P < 0.05, and $significantly different from BDL at P < 0.05, using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.
Effect of different treatments on nitrosative and oxidative stress in bile duct ligated rats.
| Treatment | Control | Sham | BDL | Aminoguanidine | L-NAME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPO | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.9 | 4.6# ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 |
| GSH | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 1.6 | 0.4# ± 0.1 | 0.9$ ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| MDA | 24.6 ± 0.1 | 41.1 | 62.7# ± 2.3 | 52.7$ ± 2.6 | 58.2 ± 2.5 |
| NO | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.94# ± 0.02 | 0.19$ ± 0.02 | 0.08$ ± 0.004 |
Data are presented as mean ± S.E., n = 6. Significantly different from control at P < 0.05, #significantly different from sham at P < 0.05, and $significantly different from BDL at P < 0.05, using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.
Figure 1Effect of aminoguanidine (AG) and L-NAME on liver TNF-α gene expression relative to β-actin in bile duct ligated (BDL) rats and an agarose gel electrophoresis show PCR products of TNF alpha. Lane M: DNA marker with 100 bp; Lane 1: PCR products of TNF alpha in control group; Lane 2: PCR products of TNF alpha in sham group; Lane 3: PCR products of TNF alpha in BDL group; Lane 4: PCR products of TNF alpha in aminoguanidine group; Lane 5: PCR products of TNF alpha in L-NAME group.
Figure 2Effect of aminoguanidine (AG) and L-NAME on liver TGF-1β gene expression relative to β-actin in bile duct ligated (BDL) rats and an agarose gel electrophoresis show PCR products of TGF beta in different studied groups. Lane M: DNA marker with 100 bp; Lane 1: PCR products of TGF beta in control group; Lane 2: PCR products of TGF beta in sham group; Lane 3: PCR products of TGF beta in BDL group; Lane 4: PCR products of TGF beta in aminoguanidine group; Lane 5: PCR products of TGF beta in L-NAME group.
Figure 3Effect of aminoguanidine (AG) and L-NAME on liver MMP-13 gene expression relative to β-actin in bile duct ligated (BDL) rats and an agarose gel electrophoresis show PCR products of MMP-13 in different studied groups. Lane M: DNA marker with 100 bp; Lane 1: PCR products of MMP-13 in control group; Lane 2: PCR products of MMP-13 in sham group; Lane 3: PCR products of MMP-13 in BDL group; Lane 4: PCR products of MMP-13 in aminoguanidine group; Lane 5: PCR products of MMP-13 in L-NAME group.