Literature DB >> 26691721

The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States.

Brooke L Bateman1, Anna M Pidgeon1, Volker C Radeloff1, Jeremy VanDerWal2,3, Wayne E Thogmartin4, Stephen J Vavrus5, Patricia J Heglund6.   

Abstract

Climate change may drastically alter patterns of species distributions and richness, but predicting future species patterns in occurrence is challenging. Significant shifts in distributions have already been observed, and understanding these recent changes can improve our understanding of potential future changes. We assessed how past climate change affected potential breeding distributions for landbird species in the conterminous United States. We quantified the bioclimatic velocity of potential breeding distributions, that is, the pace and direction of change for each species' suitable climate space over the past 60 years. We found that potential breeding distributions for landbirds have shifted substantially with an average velocity of 1.27 km yr(-1) , about double the pace of prior distribution shift estimates across terrestrial systems globally (0.61 km yr(-1) ). The direction of shifts was not uniform. The majority of species' distributions shifted west, northwest, and north. Multidirectional shifts suggest that changes in climate conditions beyond mean temperature were influencing distributional changes. Indeed, precipitation variables that were proxies for extreme conditions were important variables across all models. There were winners and losers in terms of the area of distributions; many species experienced contractions along west and east distribution edges, and expansions along northern distribution edges. Changes were also reflected in the potential species richness, with some regions potentially gaining species (Midwest, East) and other areas potentially losing species (Southwest). However, the degree to which changes in potential breeding distributions are manifested in actual species richness depends on landcover. Areas that have become increasingly suitable for breeding birds due to changing climate are often those attractive to humans for agriculture and development. This suggests that many areas might have supported more breeding bird species had the landscape not been altered. Our study illustrates that climate change is not only a future threat, but something birds are already experiencing.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxent; North American breeding landbirds; anthropogenic land use; climate change; distribution shifts; species distribution model; species richness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691721     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Long-term phenology of two North American secondary cavity-nesters in response to changing climate conditions.

Authors:  Tyler E Wysner; Andrew W Bartlow; Charles D Hathcock; Jeanne M Fair
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2019-10-11

2.  Lowland biotic attrition revisited: body size and variation among climate change 'winners' and 'losers'.

Authors:  Jedediah F Brodie; Matthew Strimas-Mackey; Jayasilan Mohd-Azlan; Alys Granados; Henry Bernard; Anthony J Giordano; Olga E Helmy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spatial and Host-Related Variation in Prevalence and Population Density of Wheat Curl Mite (Aceria tosichella) Cryptic Genotypes in Agricultural Landscapes.

Authors:  Anna Skoracka; Mariusz Lewandowski; Brian G Rector; Wiktoria Szydło; Lechosław Kuczyński
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental change, shifting distributions, and habitat conservation plans: A case study of the California gnatcatcher.

Authors:  Heather L Hulton VanTassel; Michael D Bell; John Rotenberry; Robert Johnson; Michael F Allen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Projected avifaunal responses to climate change across the U.S. National Park System.

Authors:  Joanna X Wu; Chad B Wilsey; Lotem Taylor; Gregor W Schuurman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multi-year data from satellite- and ground-based sensors show details and scale matter in assessing climate's effects on wetland surface water, amphibians, and landscape conditions.

Authors:  Walt Sadinski; Alisa L Gallant; Mark Roth; Jesslyn Brown; Gabriel Senay; Wayne Brininger; Perry M Jones; Jason Stoker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Climate change, woodpeckers, and forests: Current trends and future modeling needs.

Authors:  Eric S Walsh; Kerri T Vierling; Eva Strand; Kristina Bartowitz; Tara W Hudiburg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Monarch butterfly population decline in North America: identifying the threatening processes.

Authors:  Wayne E Thogmartin; Ruscena Wiederholt; Karen Oberhauser; Ryan G Drum; Jay E Diffendorfer; Sonia Altizer; Orley R Taylor; John Pleasants; Darius Semmens; Brice Semmens; Richard Erickson; Kaitlin Libby; Laura Lopez-Hoffman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Protected areas' effectiveness under climate change: a latitudinal distribution projection of an endangered mountain ungulate along the Andes Range.

Authors:  Carlos Riquelme; Sergio A Estay; Paulo Corti; Rodrigo López; Hernán Pastore; Mauricio Soto-Gamboa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Projected changes in bird assemblages due to climate change in a Canadian system of protected areas.

Authors:  Marcel A Gahbauer; Scott R Parker; Joanna X Wu; Cavan Harpur; Brooke L Bateman; Darroch M Whitaker; Douglas P Tate; Lotem Taylor; Denis Lepage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.