Fifi M Reda1. 1. Department of Botany and Microbiology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Abstract
L-glutaminase was produced by Streptomyces canarius FR (KC460654) with an apparent molecular mass of 44 kDa. It has 17.9 purification fold with a final specific activity 132.2 U/mg proteins and 28% yield recovery. The purified L-glutaminase showed a maximal activity against L-glutamine when incubated at pH 8.0 at 40 °C for 30 min. It maintained its stability at wide range of pH from 5.0 11.0 and thermal stable up to 60 °C with Tm value 57.5 °C. It has high affinity and catalytic activity for L-glutamine (Km 0.129 mM, Vmax 2.02 U/mg/min), followed by L-asparagine and L-aspartic acid. In vivo, L-glutaminase showed no observed changes in liver; kidney functions; hematological parameters and slight effect on RBCs and level of platelets after 10 days of rabbit's injection. The anticancer activity of L-glutaminase was also tested against five types of human cancer cell lines using MTT assay in vitro. L-glutaminase has a significant efficiency against Hep-G2 cell (IC50, 6.8 μg/mL) and HeLa cells (IC50, 8.3 μg/mL), while the growth of MCF-7 cells was not affected. L-glutaminase has a moderate cytotoxic effect against HCT-116 cell (IC50, 64.7 μg/mL) and RAW 264.7 cell (IC50, 59.3 μg/mL).
L-glutaminase was produced by Streptomyces canarius FR (KC460654) with an apparent molecular mass of 44 kDa. It has 17.9 purification fold with a final specific activity 132.2 U/mg proteins and 28% yield recovery. The purified L-glutaminase showed a maximal activity against L-glutamine when incubated at pH 8.0 at 40 °C for 30 min. It maintained its stability at wide range of pH from 5.0 11.0 and thermal stable up to 60 °C with Tm value 57.5 °C. It has high affinity and catalytic activity for L-glutamine (Km 0.129 mM, Vmax 2.02 U/mg/min), followed by L-asparagine and L-aspartic acid. In vivo, L-glutaminase showed no observed changes in liver; kidney functions; hematological parameters and slight effect on RBCs and level of platelets after 10 days of rabbit's injection. The anticancer activity of L-glutaminase was also tested against five types of humancancer cell lines using MTT assay in vitro. L-glutaminase has a significant efficiency against Hep-G2 cell (IC50, 6.8 μg/mL) and HeLa cells (IC50, 8.3 μg/mL), while the growth of MCF-7 cells was not affected. L-glutaminase has a moderate cytotoxic effect against HCT-116 cell (IC50, 64.7 μg/mL) and RAW 264.7 cell (IC50, 59.3 μg/mL).
Microbial sources like actinomycetes are well recognized to produce a variety of
chemical structures, several of which are most valuable pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals
and industrial products like enzymes (Thadikamala and
Reddy, 2011). Actinomycetes are considered to be preferred enzymes sources due
to their production of extracellular enzymes. Many enzymes produced by actinomycetes and
have been used as drugs like wise L-glutamine amidohydrolase (E.C. 3.5.1.2), commonly
referred to as L-glutaminase (Sunil Dutt ). Since the discovery of its anti-tumor properties,
L-glutaminases have been in prime focus (Lazarus and
Panasci, 1986). Nowadays, L-glutaminase is used as enzyme therapy for cancer
especially for acute lymphocytic leukemia (Robert
; Kyoko
).Where, high rate of glutamine consumption is a characteristic nature of some types of
cancerous cells (Lazarus and Panasci, 1986).
Based on this character experimental therapies have been developed to deprive
L-glutamine to tumor cells (Iyer and Singhal,
2008). Inhibition of the tumor cell uptake of glutamine is one of the possible
ways to stop the growth and this is the best accomplished by the use of L-glutaminase.
This in fact, results in a selective starvation of the tumor cells because unlike normal
cells lack properly functioning glutamine biosynthetic machinery (Tanaka ; Dang, 2010). Microbial therapeutic enzymes have a broad variety of specific
uses as oncolytics, thrombolytics or anticoagulant, and largely as anticancer (Sabu, 2003; Sabu
).The production of enzyme was influenced by a variety of physicochemical and nutritional
factors. The factors affecting the production in recent years had received attention as
of its great demand in clinical application and also in food industries. It is known
that, the factors involved in the process of production, would not only enhance the
quantity, but also quality of enzyme because of which it becomes more suitable for a
specific application. Optimization of parameters can in turn influence enzyme synthesis
and cell yield (Okami, 1986). The strain of
actinomycetes was used for glutamic acid production under optimum growth conditions
(Divya Teja ).
From the compatibility perspective in mass production and as well as beneficial
application aspect extracellular enzyme producer as choice of source is always
attractive (Pandey, 2003). The objective of this
study was to utilize Streptomyces canarius FR with good ability to
produce extracellular L-glutaminase and characterize the purification. Biochemical,
kinetics and in vitro anticarcenogenic properties of L-glutaminase will
be also examined.
Materials and Methods
Collection, isolation and identification of S. canarius FR
Streptomyces canarius FR isolated from Tell Basta, Zagazig, Sharkyia
Governorate, Egypt was identified according to identification keys (Kämpfer, 2006). The identification was confirmed
by the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence (Altschul
).The strain was preliminary tested for L-glutaminase production by streaking on
minimal glutamine agar medium (MGA) plates. Components of MGA (g/L) include: KCl 0.5;
MgSO47H2O 0.5; KH2PO4 1.0;
FeSO47H2O 0.1; ZnSO47H2O 1.0;
glutamine 5 and phenol red 0.012. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days.
Formation of pink zones around the microbial growth indicated the positive reaction
(Balagurunathan and Subramanian, 1993; Balagurunathan ).
Optimization of culture conditions for L-glutaminase production
Streptomyces canarius FR was cultivated in L-glutaminase production
modified Czapek's medium contained (g/L): L-glutamine 10; D-glucose 5;
MgSO47H2O 0.5; KCl 0.05; KH2PO4 1.0.
Enzyme production was tested under different cultured conditions; different
incubation periods (0-8 days); different temperatures (25-55 °C); different pH-values
(pH 4-10) under shaking and static conditions. The culture was harvested and
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min the obtained cell free filtrate was used as
crude enzyme according to Dura .
Activity assay and Protein determination of L-glutaminase
The activity of glutaminase enzyme is determined by estimating the amount of NH3
liberated from glutamine (Borek ). Protein concentration was determined by Lowery using
bovine serum albumin (Sigma chemical Co.) as a standard.
L- Glutaminase purification
Two liters from the nutritionally optimized submerged 5 days culture of S.
canarius FR growing in L-Reda glutaminase producing medium was prepared.
The precipitated protein was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C and
dissolved in a minimum volume of phosphate buffer (0.01 M, pH 8.0) (Sabu ).
L-glutaminase was fractionated by salting out (50-80% ammonium sulphate saturation).
The collected precipitate was dissolved in phosphate buffer (0.01 M, pH 8.0) and then
dialyzed against the same buffer for 24 h at 4 °C with continuous stirring and
occasional changes of the buffers. The dialyzate was fractionated by ion-exchange
chromatography (DEAE-Cellulose). After column equilibration the enzyme was eluted by
gradient NaCl (50-200 mM) dissolved in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 8.0) with 0.001 M
EDTA. The activity, homogeneity (SDS-PAGE) and protein contents of the fractions were
determined as above. The most active homogenous fractions were gathered and loaded to
pre-equilibrated column of Sephadex G100 gel-filtration chromatography) using the
same buffer for elution. For each fraction activity was assessed as above. The most
active fractions were pooled and concentrated by dialysis against buffer (Nagendra Prabhu, 1997).
SDS-PAGE Analysis
The molecular weight of L-glutaminase from culture of S. canarius
was carried out using SDS-PAGE according to Lammeli
(1970). PageRuler Unstained Protein Ladder, Fermentas marker was used.
Biochemical and kinetic properties of the purified L-glutaminase
The biochemical properties of purified S. canariusL-glutaminase as
optimum pH, pH stability, reaction temperature, thermal stability salt tolerance,
metal ions and substrate specificity enzyme were determined as described by Amena and Sabu .The thermal stability of enzyme was examined after preincubation of the enzyme at
50-80 °C using 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) for different time (10-90 min). The
relative activity was determined after the incubation of reaction mixture at 37 °C
for 30 min. The thermal inactivation rate (Kr min) was calculated by the first-order
kinetic model (Whitaker, 1972);
Ln(At/Ao) ktT, where Ao and
At are the specific activity zero and t time. T1/2 was calculated from
the linear equation for each temperature. The Tm was calculated from the linear
equation of different preincubation temperature at 60 min.Stability of L-glutaminase was examined after preincubation of the enzyme for 2 h at
pH from 4.0-11.0. Acetate (0.2 M), phosphate (0.2 M) and glycine-NaOH buffers were
used to covering pH range (4-5), (6-8) and (9-11) respectively. After adding
glutamine (40 mM) the reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The
activity of the enzyme was determined for each pH.To assay the metal ions effect, the purified enzyme was pre-incubated with each metal
ion separately for 30 min before adding glutamine (40 mM). The enzyme relative
activity was determined immediately after incubation at 37 °C for 30 min.The kinetic parameters of L-glutaminase as Vmax, Km and Kcat were estimated using
different concentrations of glutamine, asparagine and aspartic acid, separately
(10-100 mM). Michaelis-Mentel constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) were
calculated from Lineweaver-Burk plot. Catalytic efficiency (Kcat) was expressed by
the specific activity per mol enzyme.
Cytotoxicity of L- glutaminase
Cytotoxic effect of the L-glutaminase was evaluated using 5 New Zealand rabbits as
experimental group and one rabbit as control. Experimental group were injected
intravenous with 1 mL of L-glutaminase (132.2 U/mg protein/1.5 ± 0.1 kg) every 5 days
for two weeks. After the two weeks, blood samples were collected 10; 25; 40 and 50
day of the last injection. Plasma were collected and stored at -20 °C. RBC, WBC,
platelets, hemoglobin ALT, AST, GGT, total protein, albumin, cholesterol, glucose and
creatinine were determined as described by Birt
(1967) and Reitman and Frankel
(1957). Hemolytic activity of the purified L-glutaminase was evaluated
using a blood agar assay (Tay ).
Histopathological examination
Histological examination for the experimental group and control was carried out on
liver and kidney, 50 days of the last injection, according to Roy and Maity (2007).
Anticancer efficiency
Anticancer efficiency of L-glutaminase as antitumor was measured against: Human
hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2); Human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7);
human colorectal carcinoma cells (HCT-116); Human cervical carcinoma cell line (HeLa)
and Raw murine macrophage cells (RAW 264.7. MTT Cell Viability Assay was used as
described by Hansen . (% Cell viability = O.D of treated cells / O.D of control cells X
100. The five human cell lines were purchased from ATCC, USA). The efficiency of
L-glutaminase was determined using sigmoidal dose response curve-fitting models
(Graphpad Prizm Software, version 3).
Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS ver. 11 on pc i5
Results and Discussion
Identification of S. canarius FR strain
The present study showed that, the strain is S. canarius FR used
(after it has been identified by studying their morphological and biochemical
characterization). PCR amplification of 16S rDNA gene confirmed the identity (98%) of
S. canarius FR. The partial nucleotide sequence of amplified gene
was submitted in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank/update.htm) under accession number
KC748492. The results derived from the sequence analysis of the 16S rDNA gene show a
G + C content of 58.9 mol % which is in good agreement with the data published for
Streptomyces by Kannan and
Vincent (2011). The tested strain was characterized by formation of a pink
zone around colonies using MGA medium due to breakdown of amide bond in L-glutamine
and ammonia liberation (Ranjekar and Sridhar,
2002).
Optimization of L-glutaminase production
The submerged fermentation method for producing L-glutaminase was showed that, the
L-glutaminase produced, is in its optimum phase (at 30 °C for 5 days and pH 7.5 under
shaking condition at 120 rpm) (Data was not shown). Dura and Sabu (2003) stated that submerged fermentation was the routinely used
methods for L-glutaminase production from various microorganisms. The result obtained
by Krishnakumar
is in the agreement with present study. They showed that production of L-glutaminase
from Streptomyces sp. SBU1 was at 30 °C after 96 h of incubation and
initial pH 9.0. Balagurunathan stated that, the optimum conditions for marine Streptomyces
olivochromogenes L-glutaminase production were determined at pH 7,
temperature 30 °C and 3.5% salinity for 5 days under shaking condition at 120 rpm.
Divya Teja
reported that strain of actinomycetes gave maximum production at pH 7, temperature 30
°C, time 96 h and salinity 3.5%. On the other hands, the optimum conditions (pH and
Temperature) for L-glutaminase family is varied from one member to another Usha-Kiranmayi
studied one of glutaminase family he found that, the maximum production of
L-asparaginase from Pseudonocardia endophytica VUK-10 was found in
the culture medium with pH 8 and temperature 30 °C incubated for four days. Moreover,
Suresh Kumer
stated that the response surface methodology predicted that a production containing
Temperature 36.31 C, pH 7.34, Time 67.63 h, Galactose 40.20 g/L and L-glutamine 19.09
g/L to be optimum for the production of Serratia marcescensL-Glutaminase. Kiruthika and Saraswathy (2013)
revealed that the maximum yield of Vibrio azureusL-glutaminase
production (247 U/mL) was achieved in a seawater based medium at pH 8, 37 °C, 1%
inoculum concentration and 2% glutamine concentration for 24 h.
Purification of L-glutaminase
L-glutaminase was purified from 5 days S. canariusculture to assess
their yield and purity. The crude L-glutaminase was undergoes fractional
precipitation by salting out (50-80% ammonium sulfate). The enzyme overall
purification profile from S. canariusculture was summarized in
Table 1. The crude extract contained 23.0
mg of protein and showed a total glutaminase activity 170 units with specific
activity of 7.4 U/mg protein. At all purification steps, the specific activity
increased compared to crude. The maximum specific activity 132.2 IU/mg protein with a
yield of 28% was attained after Sephadex G100 purification. The partial purified was
increased more than 17 fold compared with crude. These results were in the agreement
with that reviewed by Mohana Priya . Also, Kumar
stated that Bacillus sp.
LKG-01 (MTCC 10401) L-glutaminase activity was purified 49-fold from cell-free
extract with 25% recovery with specific activity 584.2 U/mg protein after gel
filtration. On the other hand, Elshafei recorded that an intracellular L-glutaminase from
Penicillium brevicompactum NRC829 was purified to homogeneity
(162.75 fold) with an apparent molecular mass of 71 kDa. So the method used in the
present study proved to be a good method in producing and purification of
L-glutaminase.
Table 1
Summary of purification steps of Streptomyces canarius L-
glutaminase.
Purification steps
Enzyme activity (U)
Total protein (mg)
Specific activity (U/mg
protein)
Purification fold
Yield (%)
Crude extract
170
23
7.4
1
100
70% Amm. Sulph.ppt
145
17
8.5
1.2
85
DEAE-Cellulose
95
0.77
123.4
16.7
56
Sephadex G100
47.6
0.36
132.2
17.9
28
Determination of molecular weight for enzyme
The molecular homogeneity of the purified L-glutaminase from fermentation condition,
as well as their purification steps were evaluated by SDS-PAGE. Single band at 44 kDa
was appeared after final purification step (Column Sephadex G100) (Figure 1). Similarly, the molecular mass of the
native enzyme from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia NYW-81 was estimated
to be 41 kDa by gel filtration (Wakayama ). And, Singh and
Banik (2013) revealed that L-glutaminase extracellularly produced by
Bacillus cereus MTCC 1305 was purified to apparent homogeneity
with a fine band. The molecular weight of native enzyme and its subunit were found to
be approximately 140 and 35 kDa, respectively, which indicates its homotetrameric
nature.
Figure 1
SDS- PAGE of purified L-glutaminase from S. canarius. Lane
M (marker protein), Lane E, the purified enzyme.
Biochemical properties of the purified L-glutaminase
Optimal pH and pH stability
The L-glutaminase maintained its activity over a range of pH 5.0 −9 with optimum
at pH 8.0 (Figure 2 A). The activity
significantly decreased at both low and high pH values. The pH stability of the
L-glutaminase also showed a similar trend, the enzyme was stable at wide range pH
5.0-11.0 with being most stable at pH 7.0-9.0. Practically, at acidic pH values a
higher rate of enzyme inactivation was appeared, comparing to alkaline side,
assuming the enzyme basic identity. The negative effect on enzyme activity at
lower and higher pH values, suggesting the effect on ionization state of enzyme,
modifying the enzyme surface charge, dissociation of subunits/ coenzyme,
consequently disrupt its binding with substrate. Consistently, the activity of
L-glutaminase from S. canarius showed alkaline optimum pH 7-8,
this neutral pH stability of enzyme, being a favored criterion for enzyme action
in vivo. Similarly, Streptomyces gulbargensisL-asparaginase was
more stable at the alkaline pH than at the acidic one (Amena ; Kumar ).
Figure 2
Characterization of S. canarius L-glutaminase. (A) pH
value and pH stability profile. The enzyme was preincubated for 2 h at
various pHs (4.0 −11.0), then measuring the residual deaminating activity;
(B) The optimal temperature for activity was assessed by measuring the
enzyme activity at different temperatures between 25 and 50 °C; (C) Thermal
stability profile. After incubation of enzyme in different temperature
(50-80 °C) at various periods (10-90 min), the residual activity was
determined by the standard assay method; (D) Thermal inactivation profile.
Tm is temperature degree at which the enzyme retains half of its initial
activity at 60 min. (E) Different NaCl concentrations from 0-25%; (F) Km
values (Lineweaver-Burk plot) were calculated by fitting the 1 / S of
substrate vs. the 1 / activity of the enzyme. (1)
L-aspartic acid y = 7.4538x + 1.3854; (2) L-asparagine y = 3.4933x + 0.4514;
(3) L-glutamine y = 3.7046x + 0.5076.
Optimal temperature and thermal stability
The optimum temperature for the L-glutaminase activity was determined by
incubation of the reaction mixture at various degrees (25-50 °C) using L-glutamine
as substrate in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). The highest enzyme
specific activity (53.3 U/mg protein) was obtained at 40 °C. Above and below this
temperature the enzyme activity decreased (Figure 2
B). Regarding to thermal stability the enzyme had a catalytically
thermal stability below 60 °C, with a slightly decreasing in its activity at 70
°C, while completely lost its activity at 80 °C (Figure 2 C). The enzyme half-life times (T1/2) was 45.7,
38.8, 29.3 and 17.3 min at 50, 60, 70 and 80 °C, respectively. Also, the Tm of
enzyme was 57.5 °C, assuming the retaining of about 50% of its initial activity by
heating for 60 min (Figure 2 D).
Theoretically, thermal inactivation rates (Kr) are 0.0184, 0.0227, 0.0544 and
0.0449 S-1 at 50, 60, 70 and 80°C, suggesting the dissociation of
co-enzyme or denaturation of subunits by heating per unit time. These results were
in consistent with those reported for Amena
and Kumar . Also, Singh and Banik (2013) recorded that the purified
L-glutaminase enzyme produced by Bacillus cereus MTCC 1305 showed
maximum activity at optimum pH 7.5 and temperature 35 °C. The enzyme retained
stability up to 50 and 20% even after treatment at 50 and 55 °C, respectively, for
30 min. Furthermore, Elshafei recorded that the purified Penicillium
brevicompactum L-glutaminase showed its maximal activity against
L-glutamine when incubated at pH 8.5 at 50 °C for 30 min indicating the
thermo-stability nature of this enzyme.
Salt tolerance of S. canarius L-glutaminase
The results represented in Figure (2 E) showed
that, tolerance in glutaminase activity was observed by increasing the NaCl
concentration up to 25%. This is a good tolerance value. Similarly, Wakayama observed
that the L-glutaminase produced from actinomycetes has a good salt tolerance.
Substrate specificity and kinetic properties of S. canarius
L-glutaminase
The kinetic parameters for L-glutaminase towards substrates were determined from the
Lineweaver-Burk Plot (Figure 2 F and Table 2). The enzyme had relative high affinity
and catalytic activity for L-glutamine (Km 0.129 mM, Vmax 2.02 U/mg/min), followed by
L-asparagine (Km 0.137 mM, Vmax 1.75 U/mg/min) and low affinity to L-aspartic acid
(Km 5.38 mM, Vmax 0.68 U/mg/min). Also, the highest catalytic efficiency (Kcat
turnover number) for the enzyme was assessed for L-glutamine (0.75×10-3
s-1) followed by L-asparagine (0.68×10-3 s-1) and L-aspartic acid
(0.25×10-3 s-1). The high affinity of S. canariusL-glutaminase to L-glutamine as substrate was detected previously by Senthil-Kumar and Selvam (2011) and Kumar for
Streptomyces radiopugnans MS1 and Pseudomonas
sp.BTMS-51, respectively. Also, Singh and Banik
(2013) revealed that the substrate specificity test of Bacillus
cereus MTCC 1305 L-glutaminase showed its specificity for L-glutamine.
Moreover, the small Km (0.129 mmol) of the tested S. canariusL-glutaminase indicated high affinity of the enzyme to glutamine meaning that the
rate will approach Vmax more quickly (Lehninger
). Also, Elshafei recorded that the highest activity
of Penicillium brevicompactumL-glutaminase was reported towards its
natural substrate, L-glutamine, with an apparent Km value of 1.66 mM.
Table 2
Kinetics of S. canarius L- glutaminase.
Substrates (mM)
Km (mmol -1)
Vmax (U mg-1 protein
min-1)
Kcat (s-1)
L- glutamine
0.129
2.02
0.75×10-3
L- asparagines
0.137
1.83
0.68×10-3
Aspartic acid
5.38
0.68
0.25×10-3
Influence of metal ions on L-glutaminase activity
The impact of various inhibitors and activators on catalytic potency of the prepared
L-glutaminase was evaluated by pre incubation of the enzyme with each compound for 30
min without substrate. Results in Table 3
showed that, Ca+2, Ba+2, Fe+3, Zn+2,
Cu+, Hg+2 and Cd+2 considered to be inhibitor. On
the other hand, Mn+2, Na+ and Co+2 were shown to be
activator. These results were in agreement with Senthil-Kumar and Selvam (2011) for S. radiopugnans MS1
L-asparaginase. Also, Singh and Banik (2013)
reported that monovalent cations (Na(+), K(+)) and phosphate ion activated the
B. cereus MTCC 1305 L-glutaminase activity, while divalent
cations (Mg(2+), Mn(2+), Zn(2+), Pb(2+), Ca(2+), Co(2+), Hg(2+), Cd(2+), Cu(2+))
inhibited its activity.
Table 3
Effect of inhibitors and activators on L- glutaminase activity.
Metal ions (5 mM)
Relative activity (%)
None (control)
100.67 abc ±0.15
Ca+2
75.33 cd± 0.76
Na+2
105.00 ab ±
0.50
Ba+2
56.70 d± 5.29
Mg+2
81.33 bc ±60.48
Hg+2
20.00 e ±0.50
Co+2
122.00 a± 0.50
Fe+3
53.00 d±0.87
Mn+2
125.00 a± 0.50
Cu+2
50.00 d±0.50
Zn+2
87.00 bc ± 0.92
Cd+2
17.00 e ±0.50
l.s.d
27.49
F
12.669
Sig.
.000
Cytotoxicity effect of L-glutaminase
The cytotoxicity effect of purified S. canariusL-glutaminase was
explored based on the hematological and blood chemistry pictures for the New Zealand
rabbits (Table 4). From the biochemical
profiles, generally, there is no observed effect on liver, renal functions, glucose,
lipids and other electrolytes, with slight inducing effect on the activity of ALT,
AST and level of Random S. Glucose. Depending on these results, the L-glutaminase had
relatively no negative effect on liver functions, where AST and ALT was the most
potential indicator for liver dysfunction, this in the agreement with that obtained
by Pratt and Kaplan (2000).
Table 4
Hematological and biochemical parameters of rabbits in response to
S. canarius L-glutaminase.
Parameters
Control (at zero time)
After 10 days
After 25 days
After 40 days
After 50 days
Control
Sample
t-test
Control
Sample
t-test
Control
Sample
t-test
Control
Sample
t-test
Serum Bilirubin: Total
0.81
0.77
0.65
6.29*
0.74
0.63
12.85**
0.75
0.66
9.0*
0.72
0.64
2.28 n.s
Direct
0.22
0.19
0.14
4.330
0.20
0.64
-.936
0.21
0.17
11.000
0.20
0.17
2.598 n.s
Serum Proteins: Total
4.50
4.64
4.81
11.930-**
4.58
4.35
39.837**
4.94
5.09
-8.660*
4.90
4.81
3.118 n.s
Albumin
3.55
3.58
2.88
2.177 n.s
3.50
3.18
19.4**
3.52
3.48
1.857 n.s
3.45
3.38
2.291 n.s
Globulins
3.12
3.17
4.10
-46.50**
3.32
3.45
-8.51*
3.34
3.37
-2.219 n.s
3.38
3.34291
1.571 n.s
S. Alk. Phosphatase
239
243.00
254.67
-4.27*
245.33
274.00
43.00-**
247.33
251.67
3.606-n.s
245.00
249.00
-3.464 n.s
GGT
11
11.67
15.00
-4.0n.s
13.17
14.50
-8.0*
12.63
13.00
-.78 n.s
12.10
12.50
-2.62 n.s
S.GOT (AST)
22
29.00
43.00
** 23.89-
32.33
41.00
-8.549*
31.00
39.00
** 10.474-
30.00
34.00
-2.619n.s
S.GPT (ALT)
66
68.00
80.67
-38.0**
66.00
69.00
-1.44n.s
64.00
67.00
-1.29n.s
63.00
65.00
-.756n.s
Serum cholesterol: Total
45
53.00
56.00
-2.59n.s
49.00
46.00
1.964n.s
47.00
47.00
.000n.s
52.00
51.00
.577n.s
Blood Urea
0.75
0.80
1.05
-21.65*
0.88
1.03
0.78 n.s
0.93
0.99
2.268-n.s
0.90
0.99
-7.794*
S. Creatine
135
138.00
125.33
4.865*
140.00
134.00
2.598n.s
145.00
138.00
2.782 n.s
142.00
140.00
.866n.s
Random S. Glucose
93
100.33
115.00
-15.81**
107.00
118.00
-19.053**
100.00
106.00
10.392**
104.00
102.00
1.0n.s
Red Blood cells (RBC)
6.12
6.29
5.00
4.338**
6.37
5.93
44.00**
6.53
6.17
23.568**
6.50
6.47
1.299n.s
Hemoglobin)
11.7
11.33
10.00
3.941 n.s
11.40
11.20
1.23 n. s
11.70
11.00
2.646 n.s
11.90
11.20
6.062*
White blood cells (WBC)
9.8
9.50
8.90
4.32*
9.90
7.60
9.959*
9.80
9.80
.000 n.s
9.70
9.00
1.732n.s
Platelets
382
379.00
360.00
11.332**
378.00
373.33
1.257n.s
376.33
374.67
1.7814n.s
383.00
372.67
2.23n.s
*, ** and NS indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and not significant,
respectively.
Five New Zealand rabbits were i.v. injected by 1 mL of three successive
doses of S. canarius L- glutaminase (132.2 U/mg protein/1.5
±0.1 kg) during two weeks. Blood samples were collected after 10,25,40 and
50 day of the last injection. Control sera (zero time) without enzyme
injection were used.
*, ** and NS indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and not significant,
respectively.Five New Zealand rabbits were i.v. injected by 1 mL of three successive
doses of S. canariusL- glutaminase (132.2 U/mg protein/1.5
±0.1 kg) during two weeks. Blood samples were collected after 10,25,40 and
50 day of the last injection. Control sera (zero time) without enzyme
injection were used.Also, the cellular toxicity of the purified S. canariusL-glutaminase was evaluated by estimation of the degree of platelet aggregations and
hemolytic activity as described by Wei . All the hematological parameters (Table 4) were in normal range along the
experimented period, however, the red blood cells, hemoglobin, white blood cells and
the platelets slightly decreased within normal range after 10 days of L-glutaminase
injection. The L-glutaminase displayed no hemolytic activity to human blood (Figure 3). Platelet aggregation and hemolytic
activity are the most relevant biochemical assays (Pratt and Kaplan, 2000). The lack of ability to aggregate human platelets
and lyses of human RBCs are unique supportive criteria from therapeutic point of
view. Similar results approved the non cytotoxicity of microbial glutaminase (Baskerville ).
Figure 3
Hemolytic activities of Strepromyces canarius L-
glutaminase, 100 μL of purified enzyme (A) and 200 μL purified enzyme
(B).
Histological studies
Figures (4 and 5) show photomicrograph of liver and kidney section histological of
treated and non treated rabbits after 50 days of the last injection. It can be seen
from photomicrograph of renal and liver tissues, there is no observed abnormalities
in these structure. Since, the kidney showing normal glomeruli surrounded by normal
renal tubules lined cubical epithelial cells, whereas in treated tissue showed round
distal convoluted tubules lined by cubical epithelium and longitudinal collecting
duct lined by columnar epithelium (Figure 4).
Photomicrograph of treated rabbit liver showing variable sized central veins
surrounded by cords and rows of hepatocytes, comparing with negative control (Figure 5). These results were in similarity with
that obtained by Baskerville and Roy and Maity (2007).
Figure 4
Photomicrograph (at Hematoxylin and Eosin X 150 and X200) of renal section
of, (A) negative control showing normal glomeruli (↑) surrounded by normal
renal tubules lined cubical epithelial cells. (B) treated with S.
canarius L-glutaminase showing round distal convoluted tubules (↑)
lined by cubical epithelium and longitudinal collecting duct lined by columnar
epithelium.
Figure 5
Photomicrograph (at H & E X 150 and X200) of liver section of (C)
negative control showing normal architecture formed of central vein (↑) and
portal tract (ñ) surrounded by cords and rows of normal hepatocytes. (D)
Treated with S. canarius L-glutaminase showing variable sized
central veins (↑) surrounded by cords and rows of hepatocytes.
Anticancer efficiency in vitro
Using MTT assay in the present investigation, the effect of the purified enzyme on
the growth of Hep-G2, MCF7, HCT-116, HeLa and RAW 264.7 cells were studied after 48 h
of incubation. As shown in Figure (6), the
tested enzyme had a high efficiency against Hep-G2 cell (IC50, 6.8 μg/mL)
and HeLa cells (IC50, 8.3 μg/mL), while the growth of MCF-7 cells was not
affect by the treatment. In the other hand, the treatment of HCT-116 and RAW 264.7
cells with the tested enzyme indicated that there was a moderate cytotoxic effect as
concluded from their high IC50 calculated values: 64.7 μg/mL and 59.3
μg/mL, respectively, compared with the known anticancer drug paclitaxel, which its
IC50 values for these cell lines ranged from 0.5-1.2 μg/mL. Similarly,
Devi and Azmi (2012) showed that the
purified L-asparaginase from Erwinia carotovora MTCC 1428 used for
killing of Hep-2C cell line. Also, E. carotovora MTCC 1428
asparaginase was showed better in vitro toxicity on Hep-2C cell
lines (84% survival) in comparison to commercial L-asparaginase preparation (90%
survival) obtained from E. coli. Also, Singh and Banik (2013) reported that the gradual inhibition in
growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep-G2) cell lines was found with IC50
value of 82.27 μg/mL in the presence of different doses of L-glutaminase (10-100
μg/mL). Moreover, Elshafei recorded that the purified enzyme produced by Penicillium
brevicompactum was inhibited the growth of human cell line hepatocellular
carcinoma (Hep-G2), with IC50 value of 63.3 ug/mL. Meanwhile, Nathiya indicated
a crucial role of Aspergillus flavus KUGF009L-glutaminase in breast
cancer (MCF7). Furthermore, Roberts found that L-glutaminase from
Pseudomonas sp. 7A is administered to inhibit HIV replication in
infected cells. The enzyme brings about inhibition of tumor (melanoma) and DNA
biosynthesis in affected cells. Glutaminase and asparaginase enzymes have produced
prolonged remissions of certain experiment tumors (Wriston and Yellin, 1973). During treatment, plasma glutamine and
asparagines are depleted. The degree of amino acid depletion depends on the kinetic
properties of the enzymes, its biological half life in the animal, and the rate of
input of the amino acid into circulation (Wriston and
Yellin, 1973).
Figure 6
Cytotoxic effect of S. canarius L-glutaminase on tumor
cell lines using MTT assay (n = 4), HCT-116 (A), MCF-7 (B), HepG2 (C), HeLa (D)
and RAW 264.7 (E). Cells exposed to different concentrations of the drug for 48
hours. All data are expressed as the mean value of cell viability (% of
control) ± S.E.s
In conclusion, S. canarius (KC460654) had remarkable capacity to
produce L-glutaminase. The purified enzyme showed a unique specificity to glutamine,
broad pH stability, and high thermal stability. Also, the purified enzyme is being
promising candidate for application as antitumor agent in the future work.
Authors: Luqman Shah; Muhammad Shahid Nadeem; Jalaluddin Azam Khan; Mustafa A Zeyadi; Mazin A Zamzami; Kaleemuddin Mohammed Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Yasser S Mostafa; Saad A Alamri; Mohammad Y Alfaifi; Sulaiman A Alrumman; Serag Eldin I Elbehairi; Tarek H Taha; Mohamed Hashem Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 4.411