Literature DB >> 26691322

Assessing the use of Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital as a clinical plaque assessment.

Sun-Young Han1, Bo-Ra Kim2, Hae-Youn Ko2, Ho-Keun Kwon2, Baek-Il Kim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to compare the relationship between red fluorescent plaque (RF plaque) area by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital (QLF-D) and disclosed plaque area by two-tone disclosure, and to assess the bacterial composition of the RF plaque by real time-PCR.
METHODS: Fifty healthy subjects were included and 600 facial surfaces of their anterior teeth were examined. QLF-D was taken on two separate occasions (before and after disclosing), and the RF plaque area was calculated based on Plaque Percent Index (PPI). After disclosing, the stained plaque area was analyzed to investigate the relationship with the RF plaque area. The relationship was evaluated using Pearson correlation and paired t-test. Then, the RF and non-red fluorescent (non-RF) plaque samples were obtained from the same subject for real-time PCR test. Total 10 plaque samples were compared the ratio of the 6 of bacteria using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: Regarding the paired t-test, the blue-staining plaque area (9.3±9.2) showed significantly similarity with the RF plaque area (9.1±14.9, p=0.80) at ΔR20, however, the red-staining plaque area (31.6±20.9) presented difference from the RF plaque area (p<0.0001). In addition, bacterial composition of Prevotella intermedia and Streptococcus anginosus was associated with substantially more the RF plaque than the non-RF plaque (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The plaque assessment method using QLF-D has potential to detect mature plaque, and the plaque area was associated with the blue-staining area using two-tone disclosure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorescence; Mature plaque; Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-digital

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691322     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  10 in total

1.  Oral health status of inpatients with varying physical activity limitations in rehabilitation wards: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  So Jung Mun; Hyun Sun Jeon; Eun Sil Choi; Ree Lee; Sung Hoon Kim; Sun Young Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Fluorescence change of Fusobacterium nucleatum due to Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  Min-Ah Lee; Si-Mook Kang; Se-Yeon Kim; Ji-Soo Kim; Jin-Bom Kim; Seung-Hwa Jeong
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  A Changeable Lab-on-a-Chip Detector for Marine Nonindigenous Microorganisms in Ship's Ballast Water.

Authors:  Myint Myint Maw; Xinxiang Pan; Zhen Peng; Yanjuan Wang; Long Zhao; Bowen Dai; Junsheng Wang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Comparison of dental plaque reduction after use of electric toothbrushes with and without QLF-D-applied plaque visualization: a 1-week randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumio Akifusa; Ayaka Isobe; Kanako Kibata; Akinori Oyama; Hiroko Oyama; Wataru Ariyoshi; Tatsuji Nishihara
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Comparison of Quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) images and images of disclosed plaque for planimetric quantification of dental plaque in multibracket appliance patients.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Tabea Glanz; Alexander Georg Glanz; Carolina Ganss; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Diagnosis of Biofilm-Associated Peri-Implant Disease Using a Fluorescence-Based Approach.

Authors:  Geelsu Hwang; Markus B Blatz; Mark S Wolff; Liviu Steier
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27

7.  Evaluation of dental caries detection with quantitative light-induced fluorescence in comparison to different field of view devices.

Authors:  Song Hee Oh; Jin-Young Choi; Seong-Hun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of short-time exposure of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer eluate on dental microcosm biofilm.

Authors:  Hyo-Jung Kim; Mu-Yeol Cho; Eun-Song Lee; Hoi In Jung; Baek-Il Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion against multi-species oral biofilms.

Authors:  Yeo-Jin Jeong; Hee-Eun Kim; Su-Jin Han; Jun-Seon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Chlorhexidine versus organoselenium for inhibition of S. mutans biofilm, an in vitro study.

Authors:  Abdul Seguya; Mohamed Mowafy; Ahmed Gaballah; Abbas Zaher
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.