| Literature DB >> 26690958 |
Martina Esposito1, Kelvin Titimbo1,2, Klaus Zimmermann1,2, Francesca Giusti1, Francesco Randi1, Davide Boschetto3, Fulvio Parmigiani1,4, Roberto Floreanini2, Fabio Benatti1,2, Daniele Fausti1,4.
Abstract
Fluctuations of the atomic positions are at the core of a large class of unusual material properties ranging from quantum para-electricity to high temperature superconductivity. Their measurement in solids is the subject of an intense scientific debate focused on seeking a methodology capable of establishing a direct link between the variance of the atomic displacements and experimentally measurable observables. Here we address this issue by means of non-equilibrium optical experiments performed in shot-noise-limited regime. The variance of the time-dependent atomic positions and momenta is directly mapped into the quantum fluctuations of the photon number of the scattered probing light. A fully quantum description of the non-linear interaction between photonic and phononic fields is benchmarked by unveiling the squeezing of thermal phonons in α-quartz.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26690958 PMCID: PMC4703887 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Time domain transmittance histogram plot.
ΔT distribution as a function of pump–probe delay for a representative scan l. (a) For each time delay a colour plot of the normalized histogram of N=4,000 acquired pulses is shown. (b) Histogram plot of ΔT centred at zero. The data shown are obtained with the largest pump fluence used in the experiments (25 mJ cm−2).
Figure 2Time domain transmittance mean and variance.
(a) ΔTmean (blue curve) and ΔTvar (red curve) as a function of the pump–probe time delay. The zero time is the instant in which pump and probe arrive simultaneously on the sample. In the inset a zoom of the variance for the first 3 ps is shown. (b) Wavelet analysis (Morlet power spectrum) of the variance oscillating part. (c) Fourier transforms of the oscillating parts of mean (blue curve) and variance (red curve). In a and c, the left axis is related to the mean while the right axis is related to the variance.
Figure 3Sketch of the four-step effective theoretical model.
The steps are indicated with roman numbers. The details of the theory for each step are reported in the text. The photon and phonon system are denoted with I and II, respectively.
Figure 4Model predictions.
Theoretical calculations of the mean value and the variance of the number of photons of the emitted field. The left axis is related to the mean while the right axis is related to the variance. Comparison between the case with squeezing coupling constant μs=0 (a) and μs≠0 (b). A wavelet analysis (Morlet power spectrum) of the variance is reported in the inset for both cases.
Figure 5Fourier transform 2Ω peak amplitude of the variance.
Amplitude of the 2Ω peak of the Fourier transform of the time-dependent variance ΔTvar. The error bars indicate the s.d. over 10 scans. Comparison between experiments and theory as a function of the pump fluence. In the inset the uncertainties for the phonon position and momentum operators, calculated from the model, are plotted for the corresponding pump fluences.