Valerie P Grignol1, Andrew D Smith2, Darya Shlapak2, Xu Zhang3, Sara Martin Del Campo1, William E Carson4. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA. 3. Center of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA. 4. Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: william.carson@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Body fat distribution is an emerging prognostic indicator in patients treated with anti-angiogenic (AA) therapy. We sought to evaluate the association of visceral and subcutaneous fat with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with AA therapy. METHODS: Stage IV melanoma patients received bevacizumab ±interferon-alpha. Total abdominal fat, visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at L3-L4 on CT images (cm(2)). PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of fat and clinical variables with PFS and OS. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluated. Median VFA/SFA and body mass index (BMI) were used to group patients into high and low cohorts. PFS and OS were significantly decreased in patients with high VFA/SFA versus low (PFS, p=0.009; OS, p = 0.007), but not for BMI (PFS, p=0.774; OS, p=0.881). VFA/SFA, LDH and liver metastasis (LM) were predictors of PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. A prognostic score combining VFA/SFA, LDH, and presence or absence of LM had a higher accuracy for predicting PFS at 3 months (AUC 0.759) and OS at 24 months (AUC 0.846) than LDH and LM alone (PFS, AUC 0.705; OS, AUC 0.786). CONCLUSION: Increased VFA/SFA is associated with decreased PFS and OS in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with AA therapy, indicating body fat distribution is an important prognostic factor.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Body fat distribution is an emerging prognostic indicator in patients treated with anti-angiogenic (AA) therapy. We sought to evaluate the association of visceral and subcutaneous fat with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with AA therapy. METHODS: Stage IV melanomapatients received bevacizumab ± interferon-alpha. Total abdominal fat, visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at L3-L4 on CT images (cm(2)). PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of fat and clinical variables with PFS and OS. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluated. Median VFA/SFA and body mass index (BMI) were used to group patients into high and low cohorts. PFS and OS were significantly decreased in patients with high VFA/SFA versus low (PFS, p=0.009; OS, p = 0.007), but not for BMI (PFS, p=0.774; OS, p=0.881). VFA/SFA, LDH and liver metastasis (LM) were predictors of PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. A prognostic score combining VFA/SFA, LDH, and presence or absence of LM had a higher accuracy for predicting PFS at 3 months (AUC 0.759) and OS at 24 months (AUC 0.846) than LDH and LM alone (PFS, AUC 0.705; OS, AUC 0.786). CONCLUSION: Increased VFA/SFA is associated with decreased PFS and OS in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with AA therapy, indicating body fat distribution is an important prognostic factor.
Authors: Lucía Robado de Lope; Olwen Leaman Alcíbar; Ana Amor López; Marta Hergueta-Redondo; Héctor Peinado Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Laura A Bertrand; Lewis J Thomas; Peng Li; Claire M Buchta; Shannon K Boi; Rachael M Orlandella; James A Brown; Kenneth G Nepple; Lyse A Norian Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Megan E Buechel; Danielle Enserro; Robert A Burger; Mark F Brady; Katrina Wade; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Andrew B Nixon; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; David M O'Malley; Heidi Gray; Krishnansu S Tewari; Robert S Mannel; Michael J Birrer; Kathleen N Moore Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: P J Navin; M R Moynagh; E J Atkinson; P Tirumanisetty; N K LeBrasseur; A Kumar; S Khosla; N Takahashi Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 7.643
Authors: Karen Klepsland Mauland; Øyvin Eng; Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Ingvild L Tangen; Anna Berg; Helga B Salvesen; Øyvind O Salvesen; Camilla Krakstad; Jone Trovik; Erling A Hoivik; Henrica Maria Johanna Werner; Gunnar Mellgren; Ingfrid S Haldorsen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-10-19
Authors: Sabina Cauci; Vincenzo Maione; Cinzia Buligan; Martina Linussio; Diego Serraino; Giuseppe Stinco Journal: Cancer Biol Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.248