Literature DB >> 26690765

Drug Selection in the Genomic Age: Application of the Coexpression Extrapolation Principle for Drug Repositioning in Cancer Therapy.

Daniel L Gustafson1,2, Jared S Fowles1, Kristen C Brown1, Dan Theodorescu2.   

Abstract

The use of patient-specific data in drug and dose selection is becoming an increasingly important component in cancer therapy. Basing drug choice on molecular aspects of the tumor is consistent with the identification of cancer as a molecular disease or diseases, even within the same histological type, and its treatment specific to the background from which it arose and exists. Multiple examples exist of single-gene mutations, and over- or underexpression that convey either sensitivity or resistance to a given agent. What about the picture that global gene expression in a cancer presents regarding drug sensitivity or resistance? Coexpression extrapolation (COXEN) is a methodology that acts as a Rosetta stone between patterns of gene expression that correlate to drug responses in vitro and those in tumors of untreated patients to predict chemosensitivity in such tumors even to drugs that are not specifically indicated for that histotype. Further applications of COXEN in drug discovery allow for in silico screens correlating drug response and gene expression in a genetically diverse cell panel to gene expression patterns in a target tumor with the potential for identifying and repurposing compounds. Here we discuss how COXEN is being developed and tested for application in drug selection, repositioning, and repurposing in oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26690765      PMCID: PMC4692133          DOI: 10.1089/adt.2015.29012.dlgdrrr

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol        ISSN: 1540-658X            Impact factor:   1.738


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of quality-control criteria for microarray gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Catherine I Dumur; Suhail Nasim; Al M Best; Kellie J Archer; Amy C Ladd; Valeria R Mas; David S Wilkinson; Carleton T Garrett; Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Prediction of individual response to chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia using the chemosensitivity index Ci.

Authors:  Peter Staib; Elke Staltmeier; Katja Neurohr; Oliver Cornely; Marcel Reiser; Timo Schinköthe
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Precision profiling and components of variability analysis for Affymetrix microarray assays run in a clinical context.

Authors:  Thomas M Daly; Carmen M Dumaual; Crystal A Dotson; Mark W Farmen; Sunil K Kadam; Richard D Hockett
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms.

Authors:  Roger D Canales; Yuling Luo; James C Willey; Bradley Austermiller; Catalin C Barbacioru; Cecilie Boysen; Kathryn Hunkapiller; Roderick V Jensen; Charles R Knight; Kathleen Y Lee; Yunqing Ma; Botoul Maqsodi; Adam Papallo; Elizabeth Herness Peters; Karen Poulter; Patricia L Ruppel; Raymond R Samaha; Leming Shi; Wen Yang; Lu Zhang; Federico M Goodsaid
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease.

Authors:  Justin Lamb; Emily D Crawford; David Peck; Joshua W Modell; Irene C Blat; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Jean-Philippe Brunet; Aravind Subramanian; Kenneth N Ross; Michael Reich; Haley Hieronymus; Guo Wei; Scott A Armstrong; Stephen J Haggarty; Paul A Clemons; Ru Wei; Steven A Carr; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II by imidazoacridinones, new antineoplastic agents with strong activity against solid tumors.

Authors:  A Skladanowski; S Y Plisov; J Konopa; A K Larsen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  In vitro drug sensitivity predicts response and survival after individualized sensitivity-directed chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a multicenter phase II trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Selma Ugurel; Dirk Schadendorf; Claudia Pföhler; Karsten Neuber; Adina Thoelke; Jens Ulrich; Axel Hauschild; Konstanze Spieth; Martin Kaatz; Werner Rittgen; Stefan Delorme; Wolfgang Tilgen; Uwe Reinhold
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  F R Eilber; G Rosen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

Authors:  W M Stadler; T Kuzel; B Roth; D Raghavan; F A Dorr
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in poor performance status patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  M G Arena; C N Sternberg; M Zeuli; P De Carli; A Cancrini; V Pansadoro; F Calabresi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Canine sarcomas as a surrogate for the human disease.

Authors:  Daniel L Gustafson; Dawn L Duval; Daniel P Regan; Douglas H Thamm
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 12.310

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.