Literature DB >> 26689894

Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.

Vasily Struchkov1, John G Buckley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Walking down slopes and/or over uneven terrain is problematic for unilateral trans-tibial amputees. Accordingly, 'ankle' devices have been added to some dynamic-response feet. This study determined whether use of a microprocessor controlled passive-articulating hydraulic ankle-foot device improved the gait biomechanics of ramp descent in comparison to conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
METHODS: Nine active unilateral trans-tibial amputees repeatedly walked down a 5° ramp, using a hydraulic ankle-foot with microprocessor active or inactive or using a comparable foot with rubber ball-joint (elastic) 'ankle' device. When inactive the hydraulic unit's resistances were those deemed to be optimum for level-ground walking, and when active, the plantar- and dorsi-flexion resistances switched to a ramp-descent mode. Residual limb kinematics, joints moments/powers and prosthetic foot power absorption/return were compared across ankle types using ANOVA.
FINDINGS: Foot-flat was attained fastest with the elastic foot and second fastest with the active hydraulic foot (P<0.001). Prosthetic shank single-support mean rotation velocity (p =0.006), and the flexion (P<0.001) and negative work done at the residual knee (P=0.08) were reduced, and negative work done by the ankle-foot increased (P<0.001) when using the active hydraulic compared to the other two ankle types.
INTERPRETATION: The greater negative 'ankle' work done when using the active hydraulic compared to other two ankle types, explains why there was a corresponding reduction in flexion and negative work at the residual knee. These findings suggest that use of a microprocessor controlled hydraulic foot will reduce the biomechanical compensations used to walk down slopes.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Joint kinetics; Microprocessor; Prosthesis; Ramp descent; Trans-tibial amputee

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26689894     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  What people want in a prosthetic foot: A focus group study.

Authors:  Donald J Fogelberg; Katheryn J Allyn; Monica Smersh; Murray E Maitland
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2016-10

2.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Kinematic and biomimetic assessment of a hydraulic ankle/foot in level ground and camber walking.

Authors:  Xuefei Bai; David Ewins; Andrew D Crocombe; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The influence of a microprocessor-controlled hydraulic ankle on the kinetic symmetry of trans-tibial amputees during ramp walking: A case series.

Authors:  Michael McGrath; Piotr Laszczak; Saeed Zahedi; David Moser
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-10-08

5.  Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 5): Impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot categories for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.

Authors:  Shane R Wurdeman; Phillip M Stevens; James H Campbell
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2019-02-13

6.  Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.

Authors:  Michael Ernst; Björn Altenburg; Thomas Schmalz; Andreas Kannenberg; Malte Bellmann
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Microprocessor feet improve prosthetic mobility and physical function relative to non-microprocessor feet.

Authors:  Eric L Weber; Phillip M Stevens; Dwiesha L England; Vahness D Swilley; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Free-Living User Perspectives on Musculoskeletal Pain and Patient-Reported Mobility With Passive and Powered Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Components: A Pragmatic, Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Andreas Kannenberg; Arri R Morris; Karl D Hibler
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-01-14

9.  A biomechanical assessment of hydraulic ankle-foot devices with and without micro-processor control during slope ambulation in trans-femoral amputees.

Authors:  Xuefei Bai; David Ewins; Andrew David Crocombe; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient-Preferred Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Alignment for Ramps and Level-Ground Walking.

Authors:  Max K Shepherd; Ann M Simon; Joey Zisk; Levi J Hargrove
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.