Literature DB >> 26689885

Comparing safety of heparin as continuous intravenous infusion and multiple subcutaneous injections.

Mandana Izadpanah1, Hossein Khalili1, Mostafa Mohammadi2.   

Abstract

AIM: In this study, safety of two methods of unfractionated heparin administration for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was compared in critically ill surgical patients.
METHODS: A total of 50 surgical critically ill patients randomly assigned to either subcutaneous unfractionated heparin 5000 units three-times a day or continuous intravenous infusion; 625 IU/h. During the intensive care unit (ICU) stay, patients' hemodynamic parameters, laboratory tests, symptoms and signs of thrombosis and bleeding were monitored closely.
RESULTS: During the patients' follow-up, no episode of bleeding or venous thromboembolism event was recorded. The differences in ICU and hospital stays were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSION: There are limited evidences regarding safety and efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critically ill; heparin; surgical patients; thromboprophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26689885     DOI: 10.2217/cer.15.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  1 in total

1.  Portal Vein Thrombosis After Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplant: Prophylaxis and Graft Impact.

Authors:  Alexandria J Robbins; Mariya E Skube; Melena D Bellin; Ty B Dunn; Scott A Chapman; K Louise Berry; Elizabeth Lusczek; Gregory J Beilman
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.