Literature DB >> 26689705

Relational integrativity of prime-target pairs moderates congruity effects in evaluative priming.

Max Ihmels1, Peter Freytag2, Klaus Fiedler2, Theodore Alexopoulos3.   

Abstract

In evaluative priming, positive or negative primes facilitate reactions to targets that share the same valence. While this effect is commonly explained as reflecting invariant structures in semantic long-term memory or in the sensorimotor system, the present research highlights the role of integrativity in evaluative priming. Integrativity refers to the ease of integrating two concepts into a new meaningful compound representation. In extended material tests using paired comparisons from two pools of positive and negative words, we show that evaluative congruity is highly correlated with integrativity. Therefore, in most priming studies, congruity and integrativity are strongly confounded. When both aspects are disentangled by manipulating congruity and integrativity orthogonally, three priming experiments show that evaluative-priming effects were confined to integrative prime-target pairs. No facilitation of prime-congruent targets was obtained for non-integrative stimuli. These findings are discussed from a broader perspective on priming conceived as flexible, context-dependent, and serving a generative adaptation function.

Keywords:  Affective priming; Evaluative priming; Integrativity; Relational integration; Semantic priming

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26689705     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0581-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation.

Authors:  M R Klinger; P C Burton; G S Pitts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  When fair is foul and foul is fair: reverse priming in automatic evaluation.

Authors:  J Glaser; M R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-10

3.  Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses.

Authors:  Adriaan Spruyt; Jan De Houwer; Dirk Hermans; Paul Eelen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2007

4.  Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List.

Authors:  Melissa L H Võ; Arthur M Jacobs; Markus Conrad
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-11

5.  Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis.

Authors:  Christian Unkelbach; Klaus Fiedler; Myriam Bayer; Martin Stegmüller; Daniel Danner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-07

6.  The affective regulation of cognitive priming.

Authors:  Justin Storbeck; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-04

7.  An adaptive-learning approach to affect regulation: strategic influences on evaluative priming.

Authors:  Peter Freytag; Matthias Bluemke; Klaus Fiedler
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-04

8.  List-context effects in evaluative priming.

Authors:  K C Klauer; C Rossnagel; J Musch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On the automatic activation of attitudes.

Authors:  R H Fazio; D M Sanbonmatsu; M C Powell; F R Kardes
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-02

10.  Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations.

Authors:  Lara L Jones; Sabrina Golonka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implicit Bias Reflects the Company That Words Keep.

Authors:  David J Hauser; Norbert Schwarz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  The Affective Meaning of Words is Constrained by the Conceptual Meaning.

Authors:  Zhiguo Hu; Hongyan Liu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.