Literature DB >> 26689415

Contemporary Use of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Smita I Negi, Mladen Sokolovic, Edward Koifman, Sarkis Kiramijyan, Rebecca Torguson, Joseph Lindsay, Itsik Ben-Dor, William Suddath, Augusto Pichard, Lowell Satler, Ron Waksman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high rates of mortality. Smaller ventricular assist devices, such as the intraaortic balloon pump, provide limited support. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) offers more robust mechanical ventricular support, but is not widely utilized by interventional cardiologists. This study aimed to evaluate the patient characteristics and outcomes of VA-ECMO with RCS in the setting of AMI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A retrospective chart review of all VA-ECMO cannulations between 2009 and 2014 was performed, and patients with an indication of RCS in AMI were identified. A total of 15 patients underwent VA-ECMO placement for AMI with RCS. One-third of these patients presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and 60% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The Intraaortic balloon pump was placed in addition to VA-ECMO in 60% of patients. Median duration of VA-ECMO support was 45 hours. Successful wean off VA-ECMO was obtained in 50% of the patients, and vascular complications occurred in 53% of patients. The survival rate at discharge was 47%, and all survivors were alive at 30 days post discharge.
CONCLUSION: VA-ECMO is infrequently used in patients for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the AMI setting. When used judiciously, it has good clinical outcomes in this group of patients. However, use of VA-ECMO should be individualized based on vascular anatomy for best results. Close cooperation among interventional cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, cardiac intensivists, and perfusionists is essential for success of this therapy for RCS in AMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26689415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  11 in total

Review 1.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jean Touchan; Maya Guglin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-14

2.  Prognostic implication of risk scoring systems in patients with cardiogenic shock supported by ECMO and Impella.

Authors:  Makiko Nakamura; Teruhiko Imamura; Masakazu Hori; Shigeki Yokoyama; Toshio Doi; Kazuaki Fukahara; Koichiro Kinugawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  The association between postoperative complications and prognosis in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiac care unit.

Authors:  Liwen Liang; Liyuan Liu; Yamin Zhang; Xiaoying Fan; Ling Tao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tariq Suleiman; Alexander Scott; David Tong; Vikram Khanna; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in addition to primary PCI in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; A D Magan; P G Noordzij; C Zivelonghi; P Agostoni; F D Eefting; J M Ten Berg; M J Suttorp; B R Rensing; J P van Kuijk; P Klein; E Scholten; J A S van der Heyden
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Dynamic Monitoring of Erythrocyte Distribution Width (RDW) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW) in Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Li Wang; Yuchong Peng; Mingjie Xiong; Xiaozhong Cai; Juan Luo; Minghao Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Percutaneous cardiac support during myocardial infarction drastically reduces mortality: perspectives from a swine model.

Authors:  Maria Giovanna Trivella; Alessandra Piersigilli; Fabio Bernini; Gualtiero Pelosi; Silvia Burchielli; Stefano Puzzuoli; Claudia Kusmic; Antonio L'Abbate
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.595

Review 8.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Adamantios Tsangaris; Tamas Alexy; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Andrea Elliott; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; T A Meijers; S H Hofma; A J van Boven; A Nap; A Vonk; P Symersky; K D Sjauw; P Knaapen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.