BACKGROUND: The utilization of ambulances in low- and middle-income countries is limited. The aim of this study was to ascertain frequency of ambulance use and characteristics of patients brought into emergency departments (EDs) through ambulance and non-ambulance modes of transportation. METHODS: The Pakistan National Emergency Departments Surveillance (Pak-NEDS) was a pilot active surveillance conducted in seven major tertiary-care EDs in six main cities of Pakistan between November 2010 and March 2011. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the factors associated with ambulance use. RESULTS: Out of 274,436 patients enrolled in Pak-NEDS, the mode of arrival to the ED was documented for 94. 9% (n = 260,378) patients, of which 4.1% (n = 10,546) came to EDs via ambulances. The mean age of patients in the ambulance group was significantly higher compared to the mean age of the non-ambulance group (38 ± 18.4 years versus 32.8 ± 14.9 years, p-value < 0.001). The most common presenting complaint in the ambulance group was head injury (12%) while among non-ambulance users it was fever (12%). Patients of all age groups were less likely to use an ambulance compared to those >45 years of age (p-value < 0.001) adjusted for gender, cities, hospital type, presenting complaint group and disposition. The adjusted odds ratio of utilizing ambulances for those with injuries was 3.5 times higher than those with non-injury complaints (p-value < 0.001). Patients brought to the ED by ambulance were 7.2 times more likely to die in the ED than non-ambulance patients after adjustment for other variables in the model. CONCLUSION: Utilization of ambulances is very low in Pakistan. Ambulance use was found to be more among the elderly and those presenting with injuries. Patients presenting via ambulances were more likely to die in the ED.
BACKGROUND: The utilization of ambulances in low- and middle-income countries is limited. The aim of this study was to ascertain frequency of ambulance use and characteristics of patients brought into emergency departments (EDs) through ambulance and non-ambulance modes of transportation. METHODS: The Pakistan National Emergency Departments Surveillance (Pak-NEDS) was a pilot active surveillance conducted in seven major tertiary-care EDs in six main cities of Pakistan between November 2010 and March 2011. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the factors associated with ambulance use. RESULTS: Out of 274,436 patients enrolled in Pak-NEDS, the mode of arrival to the ED was documented for 94. 9% (n = 260,378) patients, of which 4.1% (n = 10,546) came to EDs via ambulances. The mean age of patients in the ambulance group was significantly higher compared to the mean age of the non-ambulance group (38 ± 18.4 years versus 32.8 ± 14.9 years, p-value < 0.001). The most common presenting complaint in the ambulance group was head injury (12%) while among non-ambulance users it was fever (12%). Patients of all age groups were less likely to use an ambulance compared to those >45 years of age (p-value < 0.001) adjusted for gender, cities, hospital type, presenting complaint group and disposition. The adjusted odds ratio of utilizing ambulances for those with injuries was 3.5 times higher than those with non-injury complaints (p-value < 0.001). Patients brought to the ED by ambulance were 7.2 times more likely to die in the ED than non-ambulance patients after adjustment for other variables in the model. CONCLUSION: Utilization of ambulances is very low in Pakistan. Ambulance use was found to be more among the elderly and those presenting with injuries. Patients presenting via ambulances were more likely to die in the ED.
Authors: Judy A Lowthian; Peter A Cameron; Johannes U Stoelwinder; Andrea Curtis; Alex Currell; Matthew W Cooke; John J McNeil Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Andrew W Asimos; Shana Ward; Jane H Brice; Wayne D Rosamond; Larry B Goldstein; Jonathan Studnek Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Lucy J Boothroyd; Laurie J Lambert; Eli Segal; Dave Ross; Simon Kouz; Sébastien Maire; Richard Harvey; Yongling Xiao; Kevin A Brown; James Nasmith; Peter Bogaty Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Caroline B Hutchings; N Clay Mann; Mohamud Daya; Jon Jui; Robert Goldberg; Lawton Cooper; David C Goff; Carol Cornell Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Uzma Rahim Khan; Umerdad Khudadad; Noor Baig; Fareed Ahmed; Ahmed Raheem; Butool Hisam; Nadeem Ullah Khan; Marcus Ong Eng Hock; Junaid Abdul Razzak Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-03