Although perovskite oxides hold promise in applications ranging from solid oxide fuel cells to catalysts, their surface chemistry is poorly understood at the molecular level. Here we follow the formation of the first monolayer of water at the (001) surfaces of Sr(n+1)Ru(n)O3(n+1) (n = 1, 2) using low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and density functional theory. These layered perovskites cleave between neighbouring SrO planes, yielding almost ideal, rocksalt-like surfaces. An adsorbed monomer dissociates and forms a pair of hydroxide ions. The OH stemming from the original molecule stays trapped at Sr-Sr bridge positions, circling the surface OH with a measured activation energy of 187 ± 10 meV. At higher coverage, dimers of dissociated water assemble into one-dimensional chains and form a percolating network where water adsorbs molecularly in the gaps. Our work shows the limitations of applying surface chemistry concepts derived for binary rocksalt oxides to perovskites.
Although perovskite oxides hold promise in applications ranging from solid oxide fuel cells to catalysts, their surface chemistry is poorly understood at the molecular level. Here we follow the formation of the first monolayer of water at the (001) surfaces of Sr(n+1)Ru(n)O3(n+1) (n = 1, 2) using low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and density functional theory. These layered perovskites cleave between neighbouring SrO planes, yielding almost ideal, rocksalt-like surfaces. An adsorbed monomer dissociates and forms a pair of hydroxide ions. The OH stemming from the original molecule stays trapped at Sr-Sr bridge positions, circling the surface OH with a measured activation energy of 187 ± 10 meV. At higher coverage, dimers of dissociated water assemble into one-dimensional chains and form a percolating network where water adsorbs molecularly in the gaps. Our work shows the limitations of applying surface chemistry concepts derived for binary rocksalt oxides to perovskites.
Perovskite oxides, ternary compounds with the principal formula ABO3, show a large variation in their composition and structure, which leads to an almost unlimited flexibility of their physical and chemical properties. In particular perovskite-type materials that are categorized as mixed ionic and electronic conductors (MIECs) are useful in a wide variety of energy-conversion devices. They serve as the air electrode in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) [1-4] and solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) [5], where they are also increasingly discussed as the fuel electrode [6,7]; as ion separation membranes in carbon capturing schemes [8]; and as catalysts in solar and thermochemical H2 and CO production and in air batteries [9,10]. To enable a rational design of better materials [10,11] one needs to understand the underlying surface chemistry. Compared to the comparatively simpler systems used in heterogeneous [12,13] and low-temperature electrocatalyis [14], knowledge of the gas-surface interaction at the molecular level is seriously underdeveloped for these complex materials.The reactivity of any solid depends on the structure and composition of its top atomic layers. There is overwhelming evidence that many perovskites are mostly A-cation terminated under operating conditions used for electrochemical energy conversion [15-19]. Thus an AO-terminated perovskite is a natural place to start investigating the fundamentals of perovskite surface chemistry; in this work we use the SrO surface that results from cleaving layered strontium ruthenate crystals as an ideal model system.We focus on the interaction of SrO-terminated perovskite surfaces with H2O. The adsorption configuration of this molecule is essential in high[7] or low[10] temperature water electrolysis and in thermochemical water splitting[9]. It is ubiquitous in the environment [20-22] which has serious consequences for the degradation of SOFC electrodes [23-25]. For the comparatively simple binary AO oxides, many of the details have been worked out both theoretically and experimentally [26-33].Here we compare the concepts derived for rocksalt oxides to the – in principle much more complex – perovskite surfaces by following the formation of a water layer from the single-molecule limit to the full monolayer. We find that an isolated water molecule on our SrO terminated surface behaves exactly as expected: H2O dissociates, and with STM we observe an intriguing dynamic behaviour that has been predicted in ab-initio molecular dynamics calculations [26]. The interaction between neighbouring molecules, however, is affected by rotation and tilting of the octahedra surrounding the Ru atoms in the second layer. This influences both the short-range and long-range ordering that evolves with coverage, and helps explain why water adsorbs as an intact molecule as the overlayer fills in. Our detailed scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and density functional theory (DFT) studies also provide a clear interpretation of the complicated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of this material, and a benchmark for investigations of more complex materials at higher pressures.
Water monomer adsorption and dynamics
As samples we used strontium ruthenate single crystals SrRuO3 (n = 1, 2) that are part of the Ruddlesden-Popper series. These consist of n perovskite-like SrRuO3 layers, separated by two layers of SrO (Fig. 1a) that easily cleave apart [34]. While the resulting surfaces resemble the (001) facets of rocksalt SrO, there are also important differences. With Sr-Sr separations of 3.9 Å, the lattice constant is expanded as compared to the 3.6 Å in SrO. The octahedral units containing the Ru atoms are rotated alternatingly by 8.5±2.5°, which gives rise to an apparent c(2×2) structure for Sr2RuO4
[35]; a similar octahedral rotation (8.1°) is inherent in the bulk Sr3Ru2O7 lattice [36], see Fig. 1b.
Figure 1
Water adsorption at cleaved strontium ruthenate single crystals
(a) Unit cell of the n = 2 member of the Sr2RuO3 Ruddlesden-Popper series. The crystal easily cleaves between neighboring SrO layers. (b) Top view of the Sr3Ru2O7(001) surface. While the surface termination is similar to rocksalt SrO, the rotation of the underlying RuO2 octahedra gives rise to a so-called c(2×2) structure. c) Scanning tunneling microscopy image (Tsample = 78 K, Vsample = +0.05 V, Itunnel = 0.15 nA, image rotated 69° counterclockwise to scan direction) of 0.05 Langmuir of water, dosed at 115 K. Water monomers appear as bright, isolated spots. Some adsorb next to each other as dimers.
We start by analyzing a very low coverage of water on Sr2RuO4 (001). Figure 1c shows the surface after exposure of 0.05 Langmuir (L, where 1 L equals an exposure to 1 × 10−8 mbar for 133 s) of water at 115 K. At these low temperatures, migration of the molecules is largely, albeit not completely, suppressed. Monomers are visible that are separated by a distance that is a large enough to safely consider them isolated, but a few dimers are already observed. In such atomically-resolved STM images, the surface Sr and O atoms are imaged as bright protrusions and dark small dots, respectively [34]. Each monomer is situated between two Sr atoms. The presence of the monomer affects the electronic structure of the surroundings, which is manifested in a changed contrast in the STM image, as has been seen for other adsorbates on this surface [34,37]. The change is not symmetric; the darker patches are more pronounced on one side.A single water molecule should dissociate on this surface according to trends for rocksalt oxides that have been worked out in DFT calculations [26,28]. For MgO molecularly adsorbed water is predicted to be more stable, adsorbing in an on-top configuration on an Mg cation site. With increasing lattice constant, dissociative adsorption should occur, which results in a pair of hydroxyl ions (OH)ads + OsurfH. This is facilitated by the increase in structural flexibility in the series CaO, SrO, and BaO [28]. Indeed, in our own DFT calculations of 1/16 monolayers (ML) water on the Sr3Ru2O7 surface, the adsorption energy of the dissociated molecule (Eads = 1.26 eV) is higher than the intact one (Eads = 1.08 eV).When testing these theoretical predictions experimentally, one runs into the difficulty that such investigations need to be conducted under conditions where the monomer stays isolated and is not affected by water-water interaction that can also lead to dissociation [29,32]. This precludes many spectroscopic methods for intensity reasons. For MgO the prediction of molecularly adsorbed water has been verified experimentally using the tip of an STM as a tool for selective dissociation [30]. Here the expected dissociation is ascertained through the observation of ‘dynamic ion pairs’ that have been predicted theoretically in earlier calculations [26,27,38].The geometry of the dissociated water is shown in Fig. 2a. The (OH)ads fragment is adsorbed in a Sr-Sr bridge site with an Sr-O distance of 2.60 Å, while the remaining H is transferred to a neighboring surface oxygen atom Osurf. The OH bond length of 0.97 Å for the (OH)ads fragment is slightly smaller than the value of 1.03 Å found for the OsurfH bond. The latter bond is tilted to allow for the formation of an additional hydrogen bond to the (OH)ads fragment, with an H-(OH)ads distance of 1.53 Å. According to Tersoff-Haman simulations the (OH)ads gives rise to a bright feature surrounded by a dark halo in the STM measurements (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Figure 2
Dissociated water forming a ‘dynamic ion pair’
a) Side view. Adsorption geometry of the lowest-energy configuration of a water monomer on the SrO-terminated surface of Sr3Ru2O7. The (OH)ads and the OsurfH interact through a H bond, preventing separation of the two fragments. b) A few selected, consecutive images for water monomer motion at 78 K; the (OH)ads hops between equivalent bridge sites, circling the OsurfH. c) Top view. The hopping modeled with DFT, showing the initial state, transition state, and final state; the calculations yield an activation energy of 171 meV. d) Arrhenius plot for this motion obtained from time-lapse STM movies (Supplementary Movies 1-6). An activation energy of Eact = 187 ± 10 meV and a prefactor ν = 10(11.0±0.7) s−1 is derived, see Supplementary Information.
Consecutive images of the same sample area show that the (OH)ads is not immobile, but hops from one Sr-Sr bridge site to the next, orbiting the OsurfH group (see Fig 2b, and Supplementary Movies 1-8). The DFT results (Fig. 2c) show how this hopping occurs. The (OH)ads is captured by the hydrogen bond formed by the OsurfH, which results in a rotation around this group. Consequently the orientation of the OsurfH group follows the movement of the (OH)ads during a hop to the neighboring bridge site. The DFT calculations predict an activation energy, Eact, of 171 meV for this process. Series of STM images were taken at various temperatures and evaluated using a simple model for one-dimensional diffusion [39]. The average time between two hops was measured (see Fig. 2d and Supplementary Tables 1-3). Fitting the Arrhenius equation gives an attempt frequency of 10(11.0±0.7) s−1 and an Eact of 187±10 meV, in good agreement with the DFT calculations.
Water dimers and chains
In addition to monomers, some dimers are observed already at low temperatures (Fig. 1c), i.e., two bright spots located at neighboring Sr-Sr bridge sites. This is consistent with DFT results that show an energy gain of about 109 meV/molecule for dissociative adsorption next to each other (1/8 ML) compared to more separated sites (1/16 ML). No hopping is observed, apparently the circular motion is hindered by the second, neighboring adsorbate. Interestingly, all dimers are situated in one specific position of the c(2×2) surface, see the grid overlay in Supplementary Figs 2 and 3. The tendency for water molecules to adsorb at specific, neighboring sites is more pronounced when a small coverage of water is annealed. When the temperature is raised, the water molecules become mobile and aggregate into one-dimensional chains, see Fig. 3. On the Sr3Ru2O7 surface the chains consist of an assembly of dimers. They appear slightly displaced from the Sr-Sr bridge site. The (OH)ads within each dimer tilt towards the same side, suggesting that the associated OsurfH sit next to each other. In Fig. 3a horizontally oriented chains with an upwards/downwards shifted position are marked by a blue/red box. The shift is discerned most easily when two differently tilted dimers sit next to each other (Fig. 3a, mixed-color box and inset). The strict alignment in the chains is pronounced on the Sr3Ru2O7 surface, where the dimerization is dictated by the octahedral rotation inherent in the bulk structure. For the one-layer perovskite, Sr2RuO4, water also assembles in chains, but the structure is less rigid, and a zigzag configuration is also observed (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3
Formation of H2O chains
STM images after annealing to room temperature a H2O dose of 0.05 Langmuir for 1 hour. a) Sr3Ru2O7 (T = 78 K, Vsample = +0.5 V, Itunnel = 0.15 nA, image rotated 20° counterclockwise to scan direction). Dimers within the chains are slightly shifted upwards (blue rectangle) and downwards (red rectangle) from the Sr-Sr bridge sites. The inset shows the adsorption geometry of two dimers sitting next to each other, where the OsurfH fragments of the left and right dimers sit above and below a row of Sr atoms, respectively. b) Sr2RuO4 (T = 78 K, Vsample = +0.7 V, Itunnel = 0.15 nA, image rotated 36.5° clockwise to scan direction).
The tendency to adsorb in well-defined positions in the c(2×2) structure is related to the symmetry of the underlying perovskite lattice. Due to the clockwise and counterclockwise rotation of the edge-sharing RuO6 octahedra, the ‘empty space’ between them resembles rhombohedra with their long axes rotated alternatingly by 90° in a top view model (Fig 1b and inset Fig. 3a). According to DFT calculations, two neighboring, dissociated water molecules are energetically more favorable (by ΔE = 62 meV) at positions across the short side of these rhombohedra (Supplementary Fig. 4). The energy difference results from the interaction between the Sr atom and the two (OH)ads. When the dimers span the “short” site, the Sr atom between two (OH)ads can relax away as it moves with the RuO6 octahedra rotation direction, while the Sr would move against the rotation of the octahedra at the other position. The preference of the dimers for a specific site of the c(2×2) grid is the same for Sr3Ru3O7 and Sr2RuO4. This can be explained by the similar surface structure: For Sr2RuO4, the octahedra are not rotated in the bulk. However, due to a surface reconstruction [35] the surface ocatahedra are rotated by 8.5±2.5°, which is quite close to the octahedral rotation inherent in the Sr3Ru2O7 lattice (8.1°).
Full water monolayer
Figure 4a shows the structure after the Sr2RuO4 sample was exposed to 1 L of water at 160 K. The chains now form a percolating network. (A water overlayer on Sr3Ru2O7 has a similar appearance, see Supplementary Fig. 5.) In between the bright lines of the chains small areas remain spared out. Here the water appears in the form of isolated, bright spots; their number (up to six) depends on the size of the area. The small-scale image in Fig. 4b shows the spots in relationship to the underlying surface atoms. Under the assumption that the (OH)ads in the chains continue to be positioned in Sr-Sr bridge positions, the bright spots are located mostly on-top of Sr.
Figure 4
Full monolayer of water
a) STM image (T = 78 K, Vsample = +0.5 V, Itunnel = 0.1 nA, image rotated 53.5° counterclockwise to scan direction) of Sr2RuO4 after dosing 1.0 L water at 160 K. b) Small-scale STM image (T = 78 K, Vsample = +0.4 V, Itunnel = 0.1 nA) with substrate atoms (blue – Sr, red – O) overlaid. Note the switch in adsorption site, from Sr-Sr positions within the 1D lines, to on-top configuration in the areas in between. c) XPS spectra of the O1s region after exposure of the clean, cleaved Sr2RuO4 surface to increasing amounts of water at 140 K. The shoulder and peak at 530.4 eV and 532.8 eV are indicative of hydroxyls and molecular water, respectively.
The calculations in ref. [28] suggest that a switch in adsorption site from bridge to top position indicates molecular instead of dissociative adsorption. This was tested using XPS (Fig. 4c). The O1s region of the clean, as-cleaved Sr2RuO4 surface shows a two-peak structure. In ref. [40] it was proposed that this should be due to the different bonding environments of the apical and the in-plane O atoms within the RuO6 octahedra; this is consistent with our calculations, see Supplementary Table 4. Upon dosing a small amount of H2O a shoulder at 530.4 eV appears that is indicative of OH groups. The substrate O1s peak at 528.4 eV decreases more strongly, in agreement with the assignment of apical O atoms, i.e., the ones residing within the top surface plane. With increasing exposure a clearly distinct peak at 532.8 eV develops, consistent with our theoretical predictions for the presence of molecular water, see Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Fig. 6. Additional water leads to features indicative of water multilayers in XPS, see Supplementary Fig. 7. Annealing to room temperature is sufficient to remove most of the adsorbed water except for a network of water chains that remains on the surface (Supplementary Fig. 8).
Adsorption at oxygen vacancies
The surface chemistry of oxides is often heavily influenced by defects, thus we also tested the interaction of water with oxygen vacancies (VO), see Fig. 5. In previous work we found that typically surface VOs are not present on as-cleaved strontium ruthenate surfaces [34]. They can be created purposely by irradiating with electrons, however, as we have done in Fig. 5a. At low temperature water does not interact with the VOs (Fig. 5b), but when a water-exposed surface is slightly annealed (Fig. 5c), bright species are observed. Water dissociating at O vacancies results in the vacancy being filled and two OsurfH species. These are clearly distinct from the hydroxyl pairs (compare the dimer in Fig. 5d). They also form 1D chains, albeit with a large separation between them that points towards a repulsive interaction between isolated OsurfH.
Figure 5
Interaction of water with O vacancies
a) Sr3Ru2O7 after irradiation with 1000 eV electrons at 105 K (current ~ 1.5 μA). Vacancies appear as small, dark crosses. b) After exposure to 0.02 Langmuir of water at 105 K. c) As in (b) but after annealing to 200 K for 30 minutes. d) As in (c) but after annealing to 300 K for 30 minutes. Small-scale image (image rotated 26.5° counterclockwise to scan direction). One dimer is marked with a box. Scanning conditions: Itunnel = 0.15 nA, Tsample = 78 K, (a) Vsample = +0.1 V, (b) Vsample = +0.2 V, (c) and (d) Vsample = +0.8 V.
Discussion
These results show that the theoretical concepts derived for rocksalt-type oxides can also be applied to AO-terminated perovskite surfaces. The confirmation of the theoretically-predicted, constricted motion of the (OH)ads fragment raises confidence in computational studies of water adsorption. Moreover, it allows distinguishing the state of single, isolated water molecules, even at very low coverage where they are truly isolated. As is expected for a rocksalt-type surface with larger lattice constant, the monomer dissociates [28]. The fact that the O octahedra on a perovskite surface are less rigid as compared to a rocksalt structure contributes to the propensity for dissociation. Probably this results in strong hydroxylation of SrO-terminated SrTiO3(001) surfaces that has been concluded from friction force measurements [41]. Recent near-ambient pressure XPS experiments report a rather complex O1s feature upon exposure to a humid atmosphere [42]. The XPS spectra in Fig. 4 and in Supplementary Figs 7 and 9, taken on an as-cleaved surface and backed up by atomically-resolved STM results, provide an unequivocal interpretation of the various peaks.While the structure and dynamics of the monomer is in line with the expectations for a SrO(001) surface, the configuration of the ‘hydroxyl pair dimer’ and the 1D chains is influenced by the RuO2 layer underneath. The observed aggregation into dimers and 1D chains implies that the (OH)ads + H fragments associate easily so that the water diffuses as a whole unit. At this point it is unclear whether this diffusion is assisted by other water molecules as has been observed in several other cases [43,44]. While 1D chains have been observed on a CaO(001) surface [31], these were interpreted as aggregates of dissociated and non-dissociated water molecules interacting with each other. In case of SrO-terminated strontium ruthenates the hydroxyl pairs preferably sit at neighbouring sites that allow a tilt and rotation of the oxygen octahedra that is most accommodating to the adsorbates. This allows a continued, strong interaction between the fragments when the surface is exposed to more water: the chains of hydroxyl pairs grow, eventually forming a percolating network. Apparently the area right next to a 1D chain is not capable of dissociating the water; at higher exposures molecular water adsorbs in the space spared between the chains. This molecular water is adsorbed more weakly and desorbs below room temperature. This behaviour is different from the formation mechanism of the mixed dissocated/molecular water layer on MgO, where isolated water adsorbs molecularly [28,30], but water-water interaction is likely responsible for autocatalytic dissociation [29,32,33].In summary, we have given a detailed picture of the first layer of water in direct contact with pristine and defect-free SrO-terminated perovskite surfaces. The results, taking under the most ideal and well-controlled conditions clearly show how H2O adsorption occurs from the monomer to the full layer. Dissociation is facile at regular lattice sites of SrO-terminated perovskites. The resulting OH and H fragments do not separate, however, but stay connected through an H bond between them, leading to an on-site diffusion process that is directly observed with STM. While the structural flexibility of the perovskite lattice initially facilitates water dissociation and hydroxylation, this only works up to a point. The lattice distortions ensuing from the adsorption limits this capacity, resulting in a mixed layer at higher coverages. The modification of the structural parameters that is so successful for tuning the electrical and magnetic properties of perovskites should thus also be instrumental in adjusting surface chemical and reactivity of these promising materials.
Methods
STM and XPS experiments
The experiments were carried out in a two-chamber UHV-system with base pressures of 2×10−11 and 6×10−12 mbar in the preparation chamber and the STM chamber, respectively. A low-temperature STM (commercial Omicron LT-STM) was operated at 78 K in constant-current mode using an electro-chemically etched W-tip. The bias voltage was applied to the sample; positive or negative bias voltages result in STM images of the unoccupied or occupied states, respectively. High-quality strontium ruthenate single crystals were grown by the floating zone technique using a two mirror image furnace. A detailed description of the growth procedure is found in ref. [45]. The samples were fixed on Omicron sample plates with conducting silver epoxy glue (EPO-TEK H21D, Epoxy Technology Inc.), and a metal stud was glued on top with another epoxy adhesive (EPO-TEK H77, Epoxy Technology Inc.). The crystals were cleaved by removing the metal stub with a wobble stick. Cleaving was performed in the analysis chamber at 100 K and 300 K with no apparent difference in sample quality [34]. Deionised water (Millipore water, purified in-house) was further cleaned by several freeze-pump-thaw cycles and was dosed in the preparation chamber while keeping the sample at 105 K unless otherwise noted. Electron bombardment was performed by a well-outgassed electron gun in the preparation chamber with the sample held at 105 K. XPS was performed in a separate UHV chamber with a base pressure of 1×10−10 mbar using monochromatized Al Kα X-rays and a SPECS PHOIBOS 150 electron analyser at normal emission with a pass energy of 16 eV.
DFT Calculations
The DFT calculations were performed with the Vienna Ab-initio Simulations Package (VASP) [46,47] in the PAW framework [48], using the optB86 van der Waals (vdW-DF) exchange-correlation functional [49]. The surface was modelled by a (4×4) surface cell (with respect to the unrotated octahedra) of a Sr3Ru2O7 double layer terminating at the cleavage plane. The uppermost three layers were fully relaxed performing the Brillouin zone integration on a 3×3×1 Monkhorst-Pack k-point mesh. The transition state was determined with the dimer method [50], and subsequently verified by an explicit mapping of the reaction pathway.
Authors: Samira Siahrostami; Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall; Mohammadreza Karamad; Davide Deiana; Paolo Malacrida; Björn Wickman; María Escudero-Escribano; Elisa A Paoli; Rasmus Frydendal; Thomas W Hansen; Ib Chorkendorff; Ifan E L S Stephens; Ifan E Stephens; Jan Rossmeisl Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Matthias Meier; Jan Hulva; Zdeněk Jakub; Jiří Pavelec; Martin Setvin; Roland Bliem; Michael Schmid; Ulrike Diebold; Cesare Franchini; Gareth S Parkinson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aleksandar Staykov; Helena Tellez; John Druce; Ji Wu; Tatsumi Ishihara; John Kilner Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 8.090
Authors: Daniel Halwidl; Wernfried Mayr-Schmölzer; Martin Setvin; David Fobes; Jin Peng; Zhiqiang Mao; Michael Schmid; Florian Mittendorfer; Josef Redinger; Ulrike Diebold Journal: J Mater Chem A Mater Date: 2018-03-05