| Literature DB >> 26688756 |
Kanu Priya1, Anita Yadav1, Neeraj Kumar1, Sachin Gulati1, Neeraj Aggarwal2, Ranjan Gupta3.
Abstract
This study investigated genetic damage in paint workers mainly exposed to toluene as it is a major solvent used in paint thinners. Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay was used as biomarker of genotoxicity. Blood samples were collected from 30 paint workers and 30 control subjects matched with respect to age and other confounding factors except for exposure to toluene. SCE frequency was found to be significantly higher in paint workers (4.81 ± 0.92) as compared to control individuals (1.73 ± 0.54) (p < 0.05). We also investigated influence of polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and CYP1A1m2 genes on SCE frequency. Our results showed that there was significant increase in frequencies of SCE among the mutant genotypes of CYP2E1 and CYP1A1m2 as compared to wild genotypes. Our study indicated that long term exposure of toluene can increase genotoxic risk in paint workers.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26688756 PMCID: PMC4672146 DOI: 10.1155/2015/630296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Res Int ISSN: 2090-3162
Demographic characteristics of exposed and control population.
| Variables | Control | Exposed |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | 30 | 30 | |
| Age | 31.23 ± 6.60 | 29.77 ± 6.52 | 0.390 |
| Working exposure per day (hrs) | 6.20 ± 2.93 | ||
| Duration of exposure (yrs) ( | |||
| <6 | (13) 43.33 | <0.05 | |
| >6 | (17) 56.67 | ||
| Smoking | |||
| Nonsmokers | 25 (83.3) | 24 (80) | 0.739 |
| Smokers | 5 (16.7) | 6 (20) | |
| Alcohol intake | |||
| Alcohol users | 24 (80) | 25 (83.3) | 0.739 |
| Nonalcohol users | 6 (20) | 5 (16.7) | |
| Tobacco intake | |||
| Nontobacco users | 26 (86.7) | 28 (93.3) | 0.389 |
| Tobacco users | 4 (13.3) | 2 (6.7) |
Student's t-test was applied for comparing mean value among control and exposed group. Chi-square test was applied for difference in consumption habits history among studied population. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Mean hippuric acid concentration in exposed and control groups.
Figure 2SCE frequency in control and exposed population.
Figure 3Effect of exposure duration (yrs.) on SCE frequency in exposed population.
SCE frequency by age and consumption habits.
| Variables | Control | Exposed |
|---|---|---|
| SCE/cell | SCE/cell | |
| (mean ± SD) | (mean ± SD) | |
| All | 1.73 ± 0.54 | 4.81 ± 0.92 |
| Age (years) | ||
| <30 | 1.64 ± 0.52 | 4.47 ± 0.93 |
| 30–40 | 1.83 ± 0.55 | 5.26 ± 0.70 |
| >40 | 1.95 ± 0.29¥ | 5.83 ± 0.62 |
| Smoking | ||
| Nonsmokers | 1.70 ± 0.55 | 4.85 ± 0.92¥ |
| Smokers | 1.86 ± 0.47¥ | 4.67 ± 0.99 |
| Alcohol | ||
| Alcohol users | 1.70 ± 0.52 | 4.76 ± 0.86 |
| Nonalcohol users | 1.85 ± 0.64¥ | 5.05 ± 1.27¥ |
| Tobacco | ||
| Nontobacco users | 1.73 ± 0.51¥ | 4.76 ± 0.93 |
| Tobacco users | 1.72 ± 0.80 | 5.49 ± 0.38¥ |
Significant at p < 0.05; multivariate ANOVA test was used with post hoc analysis for the comparison in SCE frequency in multiple subgroups among studied population.
Significant at p < 0.05 + highest mean rank; ¥highest mean rank (Kruskal-Wallis H test).
Influence of CYP genotypes on SCE frequency.
| Genotype | SCE/cell (mean ± SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number ( | Control | Number ( | Exposed | |
|
| ||||
|
| 23 | 1.66 ± 0.76 | 16 | 4.27 ± 0.73 |
|
| 6 | 1.89 ± 0.55 | 10 | 5.36 ± 0.74 |
|
| 1 | 2.36 ± 0.00 | 4 | 5.61 ± 0.66 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| 25 | 1.73 ± 0.54 | 10 | 4.31 ± 0.64 |
|
| 4 | 1.88 ± 0.45 | 16 | 4.80 ± 0.87 |
|
| 1 | 1.01 ± 0.00 | 4 | 6.11 ± 0.08 |
Significant at p < 0.05; multivariate ANOVA test was used for the comparison in SCE frequency in multiple subgroups among studied population.
Influence of CYP genotypes on SCE as analyzed by linear regression.
| Genotype |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | |||
|
| 0.281 | 0.075 | 0.144 |
|
| −0.121 | 0.012 | 0.565 |
| Exposed | |||
|
| 0.776 | 0.376 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.798 | 0.335 | <0.05 |
aUnstandardised coefficient.
bModel p value. Regression analysis was used for the differences in SCE frequency adjusted for age, exposure duration, and consumption habits.