S Kapoor1, A Gupta1, M Shah1. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: India has a high burden of active tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Pregnancy increases the risks of developing TB in HIV-infected women. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) reduces progression to TB, but may increase costs and hepatotoxicity. The cost-effectiveness of IPT for HIV-infected pregnant women in India is unknown. DESIGN: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of antepartum IPT among HIV-infected women in India using a decision-analytic model. We compared current practice (no IPT) with: Intervention 1 (IPT regardless of CD4 count) and Intervention 2 (IPT for those with CD4 count ⩿ 200 cells/μl). We modeled IPT irrespective of tuberculin skin test (TST) status and TST-driven strategies. Primary outcomes were anticipated costs, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and TB cases. RESULTS: Both IPT interventions are highly cost-effective compared to no IPT at current willingness-to-pay thresholds (respectively US$178.00 and US$201.00 per DALY averted for Interventions 1 and 2). However, providing IPT irrespective of CD4 count results in the greatest health benefits (21 TB cases averted/1000 patients) compared to current practice. IPT irrespective of TST status was also highly cost-effective compared to TST-driven IPT (respectively US$1027.00 and US$1154.00/DALY averted for Interventions 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: Antepartum IPT for HIV-infected women is highly cost-effective for TB prevention compared to current practices in India.
BACKGROUND: India has a high burden of active tuberculosis (TB) and humanimmunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Pregnancy increases the risks of developing TB in HIV-infectedwomen. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) reduces progression to TB, but may increase costs and hepatotoxicity. The cost-effectiveness of IPT for HIV-infected pregnant women in India is unknown. DESIGN: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of antepartum IPT among HIV-infectedwomen in India using a decision-analytic model. We compared current practice (no IPT) with: Intervention 1 (IPT regardless of CD4 count) and Intervention 2 (IPT for those with CD4 count ⩿ 200 cells/μl). We modeled IPT irrespective of tuberculin skin test (TST) status and TST-driven strategies. Primary outcomes were anticipated costs, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and TB cases. RESULTS: Both IPT interventions are highly cost-effective compared to no IPT at current willingness-to-pay thresholds (respectively US$178.00 and US$201.00 per DALY averted for Interventions 1 and 2). However, providing IPT irrespective of CD4 count results in the greatest health benefits (21 TB cases averted/1000 patients) compared to current practice. IPT irrespective of TST status was also highly cost-effective compared to TST-driven IPT (respectively US$1027.00 and US$1154.00/DALY averted for Interventions 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: Antepartum IPT for HIV-infectedwomen is highly cost-effective for TB prevention compared to current practices in India.
Authors: Betina Durovni; Solange C Cavalcante; Valeria Saraceni; Vitoria Vellozo; Giselle Israel; Bonnie S King; Silvia Cohn; Anne Efron; Antonio G Pacheco; Lawrence H Moulton; Richard E Chaisson; Jonathan E Golub Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S Swaminathan; R Subbaraman; P Venkatesan; S Subramanyam; S R Kumar; K H Mayer; P R Narayanan Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Joshua A Salomon; Theo Vos; Daniel R Hogan; Michael Gagnon; Mohsen Naghavi; Ali Mokdad; Nazma Begum; Razibuzzaman Shah; Muhammad Karyana; Soewarta Kosen; Mario Reyna Farje; Gilberto Moncada; Arup Dutta; Sunil Sazawal; Andrew Dyer; Jason Seiler; Victor Aboyans; Lesley Baker; Amanda Baxter; Emelia J Benjamin; Kavi Bhalla; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Fiona Blyth; Rupert Bourne; Tasanee Braithwaite; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Rachelle Buchbinder; Peter Burney; Bianca Calabria; Honglei Chen; Sumeet S Chugh; Rebecca Cooley; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Nabila Dahodwala; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Cesar Díaz-Torné; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Majid Ezzati; Valery Feigin; Cleusa P Ferri; Abraham D Flaxman; Louise Flood; Marlene Fransen; Kana Fuse; Belinda J Gabbe; Richard F Gillum; Juanita Haagsma; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Abdullah Hel-Baqui; Hans W Hoek; Howard Hoffman; Emily Hogeland; Damian Hoy; Deborah Jarvis; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Stephen S Lim; Steven E Lipshultz; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Ronan Lyons; Reza Malekzadeh; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Neil McGill; John McGrath; George A Mensah; Ana-Claire Meyer; Catherine Michaud; Andrew Moran; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Luigi Naldi; Charles R Newton; Rosana Norman; Saad B Omer; Richard Osborne; Neil Pearce; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Jürgen T Rehm; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Robin Room; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Kenji Shibuya; David Singh; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Hugh R Taylor; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marieke J van der Werf; Wendy L Watson; David J Weatherall; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Harvey Whiteford; James D Wilkinson; Anthony D Woolf; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Christopher J L Murray; Jost B Jonas Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mai T Pho; Soumya Swaminathan; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Elena Losina; C Ponnuraja; Lauren M Uhler; Callie A Scott; Kenneth H Mayer; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sylvia M LaCourse; Anjuli D Wagner; Lisa M Cranmer; Audrey Copeland; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Barbra A Richardson; Daniel Matemo; John Kinuthia; Grace John-Stewart Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Pranay Sinha; Subitha L Lakshminarayanan; Chelsie Cintron; Prakash Babu Narasimhan; Lindsey M Locks; Nalin Kulatilaka; Kimberly Maloomian; Senbagavalli Prakash Babu; Madeline E Carwile; Anne F Liu; C Robert Horsburgh; Carlos Acuna-Villaorduna; Benjamin P Linas; Natasha S Hochberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Youngji Jo; Isabella Gomes; Joseph Flack; Nicole Salazar-Austin; Gavin Churchyard; Richard E Chaisson; David W Dowdy Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-01-07