B Burmen1, S Modi2, J S Cavanaugh2, H Muttai3, K D McCarthy2, H Alexander2, K Cain4. 1. Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya; KEMRI/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Research and Public Health Collaboration, Kisumu, Kenya. 2. US CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. US CDC, Kisumu, Kenya. 4. KEMRI/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Research and Public Health Collaboration, Kisumu, Kenya; US CDC, Kisumu, Kenya.
Abstract
SETTING: Fifteen human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics in Nyanza Region, Western Kenya. OBJECTIVE: To describe routine tuberculosis (TB) screening and diagnostic practices among newly enrolled people living with HIV (PLHIV) prior to the implementation of World Health Organization recommended TB intensified case finding. DESIGN: Retrospective chart abstraction of PLHIV aged ⩾7 years who were newly enrolled in HIV care in July and August 2009, and who had not received antiretroviral treatment in the preceding 2 years or been diagnosed with TB in the previous year. Factors associated with evidence of TB diagnostic evaluation among symptomatic PLHIV were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1020 patients included in the analysis, 995 (98%) were screened for TB at enrolment and 613 (62%) reported TB symptoms. Ninety-six (16%) patients with symptoms had evidence of referral for TB diagnostic evaluation, including patients at large clinics, those with advanced HIV disease and those reporting multiple TB symptoms. Among the 43 (45%) with documented evaluation results, 26 (60%) were diagnosed with TB. CONCLUSION: Although most PLHIV were screened for TB, very few underwent an evaluation, and the proportion diagnosed with TB was very low. Efforts to improve TB screening should focus on standardizing the intensified case finding algorithm and linkage to, and adequate infrastructure for, TB diagnostic evaluation.
SETTING: Fifteen human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics in Nyanza Region, Western Kenya. OBJECTIVE: To describe routine tuberculosis (TB) screening and diagnostic practices among newly enrolled people living with HIV (PLHIV) prior to the implementation of World Health Organization recommended TB intensified case finding. DESIGN: Retrospective chart abstraction of PLHIV aged ⩾7 years who were newly enrolled in HIV care in July and August 2009, and who had not received antiretroviral treatment in the preceding 2 years or been diagnosed with TB in the previous year. Factors associated with evidence of TB diagnostic evaluation among symptomatic PLHIV were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1020 patients included in the analysis, 995 (98%) were screened for TB at enrolment and 613 (62%) reported TB symptoms. Ninety-six (16%) patients with symptoms had evidence of referral for TB diagnostic evaluation, including patients at large clinics, those with advanced HIV disease and those reporting multiple TB symptoms. Among the 43 (45%) with documented evaluation results, 26 (60%) were diagnosed with TB. CONCLUSION: Although most PLHIV were screened for TB, very few underwent an evaluation, and the proportion diagnosed with TB was very low. Efforts to improve TB screening should focus on standardizing the intensified case finding algorithm and linkage to, and adequate infrastructure for, TB diagnostic evaluation.
Authors: J E Golub; S Bur; W A Cronin; S Gange; T R Sterling; B Oden; N Baruch; G W Comstock; R E Chaisson Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: M Wang; J M Fitzgerald; K Richardson; C A Marra; V J Cook; J Hajek; R K Elwood; W R Bowie; F Marra Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Jeannet C Bos; Lisette Smalbraak; Augusto C Macome; Ermelinda Gomes; Frank van Leth; Jan M Prins Journal: Int Health Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Nigel Field; Jill Murray; Michelle L Wong; Rob Dowdeswell; Ntomboxolo Dudumayo; Lesego Rametsi; Neil Martinson; Marc Lipman; Judith R Glynn; Pam Sonnenberg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stephen D Lawn; Sophie V Brooks; Katharina Kranzer; Mark P Nicol; Andrew Whitelaw; Monica Vogt; Linda-Gail Bekker; Robin Wood Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Taye T Balcha; Erik Sturegård; Niclas Winqvist; Sten Skogmar; Anton Reepalu; Zelalem Habtamu Jemal; Gudeta Tibesso; Thomas Schön; Per Björkman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adrienne E Shapiro; Ting Hong; Sabina Govere; Hilary Thulare; Mahomed-Yunus Moosa; Afton Dorasamy; Carole L Wallis; Connie L Celum; Jacques Grosset; Paul K Drain Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jill K Gersh; Zachary Feldman; Emily Greenberger; Amit Chandra; Harvey M Friedman; Ari Ho-Foster; Michelle K Haas Journal: J Public Health Afr Date: 2018-05-21