Kathryn K Ridout1, Samuel J Ridout2, Lawrence H Price2, Srijan Sen3, Audrey R Tyrka2. 1. Mood Disorders Research Program and Laboratory for Clinical and Translational Neuroscience, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: Kathryn_Ridout@Brown.edu. 2. Mood Disorders Research Program and Laboratory for Clinical and Translational Neuroscience, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 3. Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have investigated the relationship between telomere length and depression with inconsistent results. This meta-analysis examined whether telomere length and depression are associated and explored factors that might affect this association. METHODS: Studies measuring telomere length in subjects with clinically significant unipolar depression were included. A comprehensive search strategy identified studies in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A structured data abstraction form was used and studies were appraised for inclusion or exclusion using a priori conditions. Analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences in a continuous random effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies (N=34,347) met the inclusion criteria. The association between depression and telomere length was significant, with a Cohen's d effect size of -0.205 (p<0.0001, I(2)=42%). Depression severity significantly associated with telomere length (p=0.03). Trim and fill analysis indicated the presence of publication bias (p=0.003), but that the association remained highly significant after accounting for the bias. Subgroup analysis revealed depression assessment tools, telomere measurement techniques, source tissue and comorbid medical conditions significantly affected the relationship. LIMITATIONS: Other potentially important sub-groups, including antidepressant use, have not been investigated in sufficient detail or number yet and thus were not addressed in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative association between depression and telomere length. Further studies are needed to clarify potential causality underlying this association and to elucidate the biology linking depression and this cellular marker of stress exposure and aging.
BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have investigated the relationship between telomere length and depression with inconsistent results. This meta-analysis examined whether telomere length and depression are associated and explored factors that might affect this association. METHODS: Studies measuring telomere length in subjects with clinically significant unipolar depression were included. A comprehensive search strategy identified studies in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A structured data abstraction form was used and studies were appraised for inclusion or exclusion using a priori conditions. Analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences in a continuous random effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies (N=34,347) met the inclusion criteria. The association between depression and telomere length was significant, with a Cohen's d effect size of -0.205 (p<0.0001, I(2)=42%). Depression severity significantly associated with telomere length (p=0.03). Trim and fill analysis indicated the presence of publication bias (p=0.003), but that the association remained highly significant after accounting for the bias. Subgroup analysis revealed depression assessment tools, telomere measurement techniques, source tissue and comorbid medical conditions significantly affected the relationship. LIMITATIONS: Other potentially important sub-groups, including antidepressant use, have not been investigated in sufficient detail or number yet and thus were not addressed in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative association between depression and telomere length. Further studies are needed to clarify potential causality underlying this association and to elucidate the biology linking depression and this cellular marker of stress exposure and aging.
Authors: Naomi M Simon; Jordan W Smoller; Kate L McNamara; Richard S Maser; Alyson K Zalta; Mark H Pollack; Andrew A Nierenberg; Maurizio Fava; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: I Shalev; T E Moffitt; A W Braithwaite; A Danese; N I Fleming; S Goldman-Mellor; H L Harrington; R M Houts; S Israel; R Poulton; S P Robertson; K Sugden; B Williams; A Caspi Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Nathaly Rius-Ottenheim; Joyce M J Houben; Daan Kromhout; Anthony Kafatos; Roos C van der Mast; Frans G Zitman; Johanna M Geleijnse; Geja J Hageman; Erik J Giltay Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Kristian Thorlund; Georgina Imberger; Bradley C Johnston; Michael Walsh; Tahany Awad; Lehana Thabane; Christian Gluud; P J Devereaux; Jørn Wetterslev Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joris Deelen; Marian Beekman; Veryan Codd; Stella Trompet; Linda Broer; Sara Hägg; Krista Fischer; Peter E Thijssen; H Eka D Suchiman; Iris Postmus; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Anton J M de Craen; Andres Metspalu; Nancy L Pedersen; Cornelia M van Duijn; J Wouter Jukema; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Nilesh J Samani; P Eline Slagboom Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Kathryn K Ridout; Samuel J Ridout; Constance Guille; Douglas A Mata; Huda Akil; Srijan Sen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Laura K M Han; Moji Aghajani; Shaunna L Clark; Robin F Chan; Mohammad W Hattab; Andrey A Shabalin; Min Zhao; Gaurav Kumar; Lin Ying Xie; Rick Jansen; Yuri Milaneschi; Brian Dean; Karolina A Aberg; Edwin J C G van den Oord; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Laura K M Han; Josine E Verhoeven; Audrey R Tyrka; Brenda W J H Penninx; Owen M Wolkowitz; Kristoffer N T Månsson; Daniel Lindqvist; Marco P Boks; Dóra Révész; Synthia H Mellon; Martin Picard Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Stefanie E Mayer; Aric A Prather; Eli Puterman; Jue Lin; Justine Arenander; Michael Coccia; Grant S Shields; George M Slavich; Elissa S Epel Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 4.905