Literature DB >> 26688399

Compliance of ENT emergency surgery with the Royal College of Surgeons standards.

S Sharma1, A Yao2, S Mahalingam3, R Persaud4.   

Abstract

Introduction In 2011 The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) set out best practice standards for emergency surgery. This national pilot audit aimed to determine the compliance of otolaryngology departments in England with these published guidelines. Methods A 26-item online questionnaire was devised that encompassed all the 36 best practices as set out by the RCS for ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery. This was sent to ENT trainees and consultants based at units in England providing emergency ENT services. Results Data were obtained from 55 of the 102 units (response rate: 54%). A mean compliance of 71% was achieved (range: 25-94%). No units achieved all of the best practices. The standards with the highest compliance included 24-hour availability of blood transfusion and haematology opinion for patients with epistaxis, availability of a consultant or ST3/equivalent for immediate discussion of severe post-tonsillectomy bleeding, 24-hour access to blood transfusion for arrest of haemorrhage and immediate theatre access for arrest of haemorrhage. The areas with the lowest compliance were provision of a pathway for angiography/embolisation for epistaxis and provision of an equipped ENT room on a paediatric ward. Conclusions This audit has highlighted that the majority of departments in England are providing a good standard of ENT emergency care. There is room for improvement in certain areas, such as the provision of an embolisation pathway in the context of refractory epistaxis. We hope that this audit will encourage ENT departments to evaluate their current provision of emergency care and institute changes (where necessary) to maintain and improve their practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical audit; Emergencies; Otolaryngology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26688399      PMCID: PMC5234372          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of embolisation in ENT: an update.

Authors:  J Risley; K Mann; N S Jones
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Health Economics . Where do the cuts leave the NHS?

Authors:  Nick Timmins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-26

3.  Nursing by numbers.

Authors:  Keith Hurst
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2006 Oct 25-31

4.  Guidelines on the management of massive blood loss.

Authors:  D Stainsby; S MacLennan; D Thomas; J Isaac; P J Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  Impact of reduced working time on surgical training in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  Richard Canter
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.392

6.  Surgical training: the impact of changes in curriculum and experience.

Authors:  Brian Andrew Parsons; Natalie S Blencowe; Andrew D Hollowood; Janet R Grant
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Trauma surgeon becomes consultant: evaluation of a protocol for management of intermediate-level trauma patients.

Authors:  Sara C Fallon; David Delemos; Daniel Christopher; Mary Frost; David E Wesson; Bindi Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003-2010.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Why do geriatric patients attend otolaryngology emergency rooms?

Authors:  Elad Dagan; Michael Wolf; Lela M Migirov
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.892

10.  Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; David A Harrison; Philip James; David Watson; Charles Hinds; Andrew Rhodes; R Michael Grounds; E David Bennett
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Embolization for the treatment of intractable epistaxis: 12 month outcomes in a two centre case series.

Authors:  Anthony E Robinson; William McAuliffe; Timothy J Phillips; Constantine C Phatouros; Tejinder P Singh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.