Literature DB >> 26688141

The ARTUS device: the first feasibility study in human cadavers.

Tim A Ludwig1, Philip Reiss, Marco Wieland, Andreas Becker, Margit Fisch, Felix K Chun, Roland Dahlem.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to perform a feasibility study of the new artificial sphincter device ARTUS in human cadavers. ARTUS is a new electro-mechanical device, which may prevent urethral damage due to a new working principle which is to perform only sequential pressure on successive parts of the urethra.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The implantation of the ARTUS device was performed in six cadavers (3 males, 3 females) with different body mass indices. Subsequently the basic operation data (operation time, cuff size, length of wires, complication) were assessed.
RESULTS: The implantation of the ARTUS device is performed easily by the same technique which is commonly used for the AMS 800 implantation. The mean operation time was 20 minutes. The mean cuff size was 4.5 cm in male and 6 cm in female cadavers. The average length of the wires was 12 cm. The necessary subcutaneous pouch had to be bigger than the space used for the tubes of the AMS 800 device. The study is limited by its preclinical setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this new artificial urinary sphincter device can be easily implanted. The technical and surgical approaches are similar to those which are applied in the case of the AMS 800 device. Therefore experienced surgeons will be able to adapt their technique easily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26688141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of surgical implant procedures for male incontinence after radical prostatectomy according to IDEAL framework.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Holger Gerullis; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-06

2.  [Sphincter and corpus cavernosum prostheses as components of endoprosthetics in urology].

Authors:  T A Ludwig; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Culley C Carson
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.