Literature DB >> 26688064

New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction response to guideline-directed therapies: The NEOLITH study.

Norman C Wang1, Madhurmeet Singh2, Evan C Adelstein2, Sandeep K Jain2, G Stuart Mendenhall2, Alaa A Shalaby2, Andrew H Voigt2, Samir Saba2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) response to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and to early cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) is not well described. CRT is recommended if LVEF remains ≤35% after at least 3 months of GDMT.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe LVEF response to GDMT at 3 months and to early CRT in new-onset LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in subjects with new-onset idiopathic NICM, LVEF ≤35%, and LBBB or narrow (<120 ms) QRS complex morphology. LVEF response between groups was evaluated with log-binomial and linear regression. LVEF response within groups was evaluated using the paired Student t test.
RESULTS: In 102 subjects (70 with narrow QRS complex and 32 with LBBB), post-GDMT LVEF was >35% in 39 narrow QRS complex subjects (56%) and 2 LBBB subjects (6%) (P < .0001). The absolute difference between post-GDMT LVEF and initial LVEF was greater in the narrow QRS complex group (16.1% ± 14.6% vs. 3.3% ± 10.7%; P < .0001). Narrow QRS complex, referenced to LBBB, was significantly associated with post-GDMT LVEF >35% (relative risk 10.30; 95% confidence interval 2.63-40.27; P = .0008) and absolute difference between post-GDMT LVEF and initial LVEF (β = 16.296; standard error = 2.977; P < .0001) in final multivariable analyses. CRT super-response, defined as post-CRT LVEF ≥50%, was observed in 8 of LBBB subjects (35%) who received CRT.
CONCLUSION: GDMT did not significantly improve LVEF in new-onset LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM at 3 months. Most remained candidates for CRT, and a high percentage were super-responders. Optimal timing for CRT implantation requires further investigation.
Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Left bundle branch block; Medications; Nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26688064     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

1.  Predictors and implications of early left ventricular ejection fraction improvement in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy with narrow QRS complex: A NEOLITH substudy.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Evan C Adelstein; Sandeep K Jain; G Stuart Mendenhall; Alaa A Shalaby; Andrew H Voigt; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Aliza Hussain; Evan C Adelstein; Andrew D Althouse; Michael S Sharbaugh; Sandeep K Jain; Alaa A Shalaby; Andrew H Voigt; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is unrelated to medical therapy.

Authors:  Gregory Sinner; Hesham R Omar; You W Lin; Samy C Elayi; Maya E Guglin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Sex-specific clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Ure Mezu-Chukwu; Evan C Adelstein; Andrew D Althouse; Michael S Sharbaugh; Sandeep K Jain; Alaa A Shalaby; Andrew H Voigt; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Left bundle branch block-induced left ventricular remodeling and its potential for reverse remodeling.

Authors:  Edward Sze; James P Daubert
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  A case of left bundle branch block with chest pain but negative troponin: a prompt for dilated cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Tha Htet Nyi; Hnin Zaw
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.410

7.  Predicting the Development of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Brett D Atwater; Kasper Emerek; Zainab Samad; Edward Sze; Eric Black-Maier; Zak Loring; Martin Ugander; Lawrence Liao; Joseph Kisslo; Peter Søgaard; Daniel J Friedman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Electro-echocardiographic Indices to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-response on Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ziqing Yu; Xueying Chen; Fei Han; Shengmei Qin; Minghui Li; Yuan Wu; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A case of modern management of Morgagni-Adam-Stokes syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Silvia Negroni; Francesca Furia; Francesca Bursi; Maria Paola Canevini; Stefano Carugo
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.