Literature DB >> 26687859

A Perspective of the Future of Nuclear Medicine Training and Certification.

Julio Arevalo-Perez1, Manuel Paris1, Michael M Graham2, Joseph R Osborne3.   

Abstract

Nuclear Medicine (NM) has evolved from a medical subspecialty using quite basic tests to one using elaborate methods to image organ physiology and has truly become "Molecular Imaging." Concurrently, there has also been a timely debate about who has to be responsible for keeping pace with all of the components of the developmental cycle-imaging, radiopharmaceuticals, and instrumentation. Since the foundation of the American Board of NM, the practice of NM and the process toward certification have undergone major revisions. At present, the debate is focused on the inevitable future convergence of Radiology and NM. The potential for further cooperation or fusion of the American Board of Radiology and the American Board of NM is likely to bring about a new path for NM and Molecular Imaging training. If the merger is done carefully, respecting the strengths of both partners equally, there is an excellent potential to create a hybrid NM-Radiology specialty that combines Physiology and Molecular Biology with detailed anatomical imaging that sustains the innovation that has been central to NM residency and practice. We introduce a few basic trends in imaging use in the United States. These trends do not predict future use, but highlight the need for an appropriately credentialed practitioner to interpret these examination results and provide value to the health care system.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26687859      PMCID: PMC4913701          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  15 in total

1.  How will we teach and practice nuclear medicine in the next decade in Europe?

Authors:  W Becker
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Trends in American nuclear medicine training: past, present, and future.

Authors:  E B Silberstein
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  ACGME Milestone Project.

Authors:  Laura Edgar; Lorraine M Fig
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Global trends in hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Byung Ihn Choi; Andrew M Scott; Kazuro Sugimura; Ada Muellner; Gustav K von Schulthess; Maximilian F Reiser; Michael M Graham; N Reed Dunnick; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A history of the American Board of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  J F Ross
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  ACR-SNM Task Force on Nuclear Medicine Training: report of the task force.

Authors:  Milton J Guiberteau; Michael M Graham
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Quality and value of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: the impact of health-care reform.

Authors:  Kristi R Mitchell; Susan K Bunning
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-03

8.  Nuclear medicine milestones.

Authors:  Lorraine M Fig; Laura Edgar
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

9.  Nuclear medicine training in Europe.

Authors:  D Croft
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 10.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Twitter Use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs: Pilot Content Analysis Study.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Akash Sharma; Ayca Dundar; Ann Packard; Lee Aase; Amy Kotsenas; Ayse Tuba Kendi
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-11-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.