Literature DB >> 26687836

Long-term outcome of molecular subgroups of GIST patients treated with standard-dose imatinib in the BFR14 trial of the French Sarcoma Group.

Anna Patrikidou1, Julien Domont1, Sylvie Chabaud2, Isabelle Ray-Coquard2, Jean-Michel Coindre3, Binh Bui-Nguyen3, Antoine Adenis4, Maria Rios5, François Bertucci6, Florence Duffaud7, Christine Chevreau8, Didier Cupissol9, David Pérol2, Jean-François Emile10, Jean-Yves Blay11, Axel Le Cesne12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The added value of tumoural genomic profiles to conventional clinico-biological factors to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was prospectively investigated in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) treated in the BFR14 study.
METHODS: Of the 434 included patients, mutational analysis was performed in 322 patients. Survival analysis was performed in patients with validated mutational status.
RESULTS: Mutational status was validated in 228 patients. We identified 196 patients with tumours harbouring 200 KIT alterations (exon 11: 173 patients, exon 9: 22 patients, exon 17: 3 patients, exon 13: 2 patients; 4 patients had double KIT mutations), 6 patients with PDGFRA mutations and 26 patients with wild-type (WT) GIST genotype. On a median follow-up of 73 months, median PFS/OS were 12.3/54.9 months for WT GIST, 12.6/55 months for KIT exon 9, and 39.4 months/not reached (69.1% at 5 years) for KIT exon 11. Tumour size, female gender, KIT exon 11 mutations and CD34 positivity were independent prognostic factors for a higher PFS. A higher OS was predicted by performance status (PS) <2, low neutrophil and normal lymphocyte counts, KIT exon 11 mutations, non-advanced tumour and female gender. KIT exon 11 mutations at codons 557-558 showed better tumour response (p=0.028) but shorter PFS (p=0.0176).
CONCLUSIONS: In GIST patients, presence of a KIT exon 11 mutation is an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS, along with gender, PS, tumour size, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts. Subsets of exon 11 mutations are associated with significantly different response patterns and PFS.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIST; imatinib mesylate; mutational status; outcome analysis; prognostic factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26687836     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  24 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): point mutations matter in management, a review.

Authors:  Peter J Oppelt; Angela C Hirbe; Brian A Van Tine
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

2.  What drives the wheel towards long-term outcome in advanced GIST, its size, genotype or may be a pill or two of imatinib?

Authors:  Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-20

3.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) metastatic to bone.

Authors:  Kemal Kosemehmetoglu; Gulsah Kaygusuz; Karen Fritchie; Ovgu Aydin; Ozlem Yapicier; Oznur Coskun; Ersin Karatayli; Senay Boyacigil; Gulnur Guler; Sergulen Dervisoglu; Isinsu Kuzu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Perspectives on the evolving state of the art management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Zoltan Szucs; Robin L Jones
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-26

5.  Early outcomes of exon 11 mutants in GIST treated with standard dose Imatinib.

Authors:  Anant Ramaswamy; Munita Bal; Rohit Swami; Omshree Shetty; Subhadeep Bose; Trupti Pai; Mamta Gurav; Sudeep Gupta; Vikas Ostwal
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  New treatment strategies for advanced-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Lillian R Klug; Homma M Khosroyani; Jason D Kent; Michael C Heinrich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Comprehensive review into the challenges of gastrointestinal tumors in the Gulf and Levant countries.

Authors:  Fadi Farhat; Abdulaziz Al Farsi; Ahmed Mohieldin; Bassim Al Bahrani; Eman Sbaity; Hassan Jaffar; Joseph Kattan; Kakil Rasul; Khairallah Saad; Tarek Assi; Waleed El Morsi; Rafid A Abood
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant Therapy to Downstage the Extent of Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Jens Jakob; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-10-09

9.  Effect of KIT and PDGFRA Mutations on Survival in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated With Adjuvant Imatinib: An Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Eva Wardelmann; Harri Sihto; Mikael Eriksson; Kirsten Sundby Hall; Annette Reichardt; Jörg T Hartmann; Daniel Pink; Silke Cameron; Peter Hohenberger; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Marcus Schlemmer; Sebastian Bauer; Bengt Nilsson; Raija Kallio; Jouni Junnila; Aki Vehtari; Peter Reichardt
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  HAND1 and BARX1 Act as Transcriptional and Anatomic Determinants of Malignancy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Shannon Coy; Jia-Ren Lin; Jessica L Andersen; Joanna Przybyl; Emanuele Mazzola; Amr H Abdelhamid Ahmed; Matt van de Rijn; Peter K Sorger; Scott A Armstrong; George D Demetri; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 13.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.