Literature DB >> 26687622

Evolution of a Communication System by Sensory Exploitation of Startle Behavior.

Hannah M Ter Hofstede1, Stefan Schöneich2, Tony Robillard3, Berthold Hedwig4.   

Abstract

New communication signals can evolve by sensory exploitation if signaling taps into preexisting sensory biases in receivers [1, 2]. For mate attraction, signals are typically similar to attractive environmental cues like food [3-6], which amplifies their attractiveness to mates, as opposed to aversive stimuli like predator cues. Female field crickets approach the low-frequency calling song of males, whereas they avoid high-frequency sounds like predatory bat calls [7]. In one group of crickets (Eneopterinae: Lebinthini), however, males produce exceptionally high-frequency calling songs in the range of bat calls [8], a surprising signal in the context of mate attraction. We found that female lebinthines, instead of approaching singing males, produce vibrational responses after male calls, and males track the source of vibrations to find females. We also demonstrate that field cricket species closely related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates substrate vibrations similar to those produced by female lebinthine crickets. Therefore, the startle response is the most likely evolutionary origin of the female lebinthine vibrational signal. In field crickets, the brain receives activity from two auditory interneurons; AN1 tuned to male calling song controls positive phonotaxis, and AN2 tuned to high-frequency bat calls triggers negative phonotaxis [9, 10]. In lebinthine crickets, however, we found that auditory ascending neurons are only tuned to high-frequency sounds, and their tuning matches the thresholds for female vibrational signals. Our results demonstrate how sensory exploitation of anti-predator behavior can evolve into a communication system that benefits both senders and receivers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26687622     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  20 in total

1.  Testing the role of trait reversal in evolutionary diversification using song loss in wild crickets.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Sonia Pascoal; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structure, Activity and Function of a Singing CPG Interneuron Controlling Cricket Species-Specific Acoustic Signaling.

Authors:  Pedro F Jacob; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Functional basis of the sexual dimorphism in the auditory fovea of the duetting bushcricket Ancylecha fenestrata.

Authors:  Jan Scherberich; Jennifer Hummel; Stefan Schöneich; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.

Authors:  Will T Schneider; Christian Rutz; Berthold Hedwig; Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Novel system of communication in crickets originated at the same time as bat echolocation and includes male-male multimodal communication.

Authors:  Jose Luis Benavides-Lopez; Hannah Ter Hofstede; Tony Robillard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2020-01-16

6.  A small, computationally flexible network produces the phenotypic diversity of song recognition in crickets.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Stefan Schöneich; Konstantinos Kostarakos; R Matthias Hennig; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Vibrational signalling, an underappreciated mode in cricket communication.

Authors:  Nataša Stritih-Peljhan; Meta Virant-Doberlet
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-09-04

8.  Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.

Authors:  E Dale Broder; Damian O Elias; Rafael L Rodríguez; Gil G Rosenthal; Brett M Seymoure; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Rhythm Generation and Rhythm Perception in Insects: The Evolution of Synchronous Choruses.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Population divergence in the acoustic properties of crickets during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ming Kai Tan; Tony Robillard
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 6.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.