Literature DB >> 26687511

Empirical analysis of BMD metrics in genetic toxicology part I: in vitro analyses to provide robust potency rankings and support MOA determinations.

John W Wills1, George E Johnson2, Shareen H Doak3, Lya G Soeteman-Hernández4, Wout Slob4, Paul A White5.   

Abstract

Genetic toxicity testing has traditionally been used for hazard identification, with dichotomous classification of test results serving to identify genotoxic agents. However, the utility of genotoxicity data can be augmented by employing dose-response analysis and point of departure determination. Via interpolation from a fitted dose-response model, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach estimates the dose that elicits a specified (small) effect size. BMD metrics and their confidence intervals can be used for compound potency ranking within an endpoint, as well as potency comparisons across other factors such as cell line or exposure duration. A recently developed computational method, the BMD covariate approach, permits combined analysis of multiple dose-response data sets that are differentiated by covariates such as compound, cell type or exposure regime. The approach provides increased BMD precision for effective potency rankings across compounds and other covariates that pertain to a hypothesised mode of action (MOA). To illustrate these applications, the covariate approach was applied to the analysis of published in vitro micronucleus frequency dose-response data for ionising radiations, a set of aneugens, two mutagenic azo compounds and a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The ionising radiation results show that the precision of BMD estimates can be improved by employing the covariate method. The aneugen analysis provided potency groupings based on the BMD confidence intervals, and analyses of azo compound data from cells lines with differing metabolic capacity confirmed the influence of endogenous metabolism on genotoxic potency. This work, which is the first of a two-part series, shows that BMD-derived potency rankings can be employed to support MOA evaluations as well as facilitate read across to expedite chemical evaluations and regulatory decision-making. The follow-up (Part II) employs the combined covariate approach to analyse in vivo genetic toxicity dose-response data focussing on how improvements in BMD precision can impact the reduction and refinement of animal use in toxicological research. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2015. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26687511     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  15 in total

1.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Quantitative differentiation of whole smoke solution-induced mutagenicity in the mouse lymphoma assay.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Robert H Heflich; Stacey L Dial; Mamata De; Patricia A Richter; Nan Mei
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Comparative Genotoxicity of TEMPO and 3 of Its Derivatives in Mouse Lymphoma Cells.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Ji-Eun Seo; Steven M Bryce; Jenna A Tan; Qiangen Wu; Stacey L Dial; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comparative potency analysis of whole smoke solutions in the bacterial reverse mutation test.

Authors:  Fanxue Meng; Nan Mei; Jian Yan; Xiaoqing Guo; Patricia A Richter; Tao Chen; Mamata De
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Benchmark dose analyses of multiple genetic toxicity endpoints permit robust, cross-tissue comparisons of MutaMouse responses to orally delivered benzo[a]pyrene.

Authors:  Alexandra S Long; John W Wills; Dorothy Krolak; Matthew Guo; Stephen D Dertinger; Volker M Arlt; Paul A White
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay.

Authors:  John W Wills; George E Johnson; Hannah L Battaion; Wout Slob; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  The development and prevalidation of an in vitro mutagenicity assay based on MutaMouse primary hepatocytes, Part II: Assay performance for the identification of mutagenic chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Cox; Edwin P Zwart; Mirjam Luijten; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Aristolochic Acid-Induced Genotoxicity and Toxicogenomic Changes in Rodents.

Authors:  Xi-Lin Li; Xiao-Qing Guo; Hai-Rong Wang; Tao Chen; Nan Mei
Journal:  World J Tradit Chin Med       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 9.  Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  Evaluation of the automated MicroFlow® and Metafer™ platforms for high-throughput micronucleus scoring and dose response analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Eleanor C Wilde; Catherine A Thornton; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.