Literature DB >> 26686941

Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy.

Chi-Kong Li1, Brian C Y Tong1, Joyce H S You2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical findings suggest that the use of rectal culture-guided antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the infection rate following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx).
METHODS: A decision-analytic model was designed to compare the outcomes of TRUSBx performed with (rectal culture-guided group) and without (standard ciprofloxacin prophylaxis) rectal swab culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis in Hong Kong. The post-biopsy infection rate, infection-related costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost for infection, and incremental cost per QALY saved (ICER) were assessed. Model inputs were retrieved from local epidemiology data and the medical literature. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model results.
RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that the infection rate in the culture-guided group was reduced from 2.42% to 0.23% and saved 0.0002 QALYs, with a lower cost (USD 31.4 versus USD 55.6) (USD 1=HKD 7.8). The number needed to screen to prevent an infection episode was 45.7. The hospital days avoided per 100 patients using culture-guided prophylaxis was 7.08 days. The relative effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis versus standard prophylaxis in carriers and non-carriers of FQ-resistant rectal flora were identified as potential influencing factors. In 10000 Monte Carlo simulations, ICERs of the culture-guided group were below the willingness-to-pay threshold 99.12% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: Using rectal culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for men undergoing TRUSBx appears to be a cost-saving strategy to avert post-biopsy infection and QALY loss in Hong Kong.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial prophylaxis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Post-biopsy infection; Prostate biopsy; Rectal culture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686941     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  9 in total

1.  Quality improvement initiative to reduce variability and improve stewardship of antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Pedro Recabal; Taehyoung Lee; Emily Vertosick; Michael Manasia; James Eastham; Karim Touijer; Susan K Seo; Massimiliano Spaliviero; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  18F-Choline PET/mpMRI for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Part 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Christine L Barnett; Matthew S Davenport; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Brian T Denton; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  A qualitative study of barriers to antimicrobial stewardship in Indonesian hospitals: governance, competing interests, cost, and structural vulnerability.

Authors:  Ralalicia Limato; Alex Broom; Erni J Nelwan; Raph L Hamers
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.454

4.  Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005-2013: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  K Lahdensuo; A Rannikko; V-J Anttila; A Erickson; A Pätäri-Sampo; M Rautio; H Santti; E Tarkka; M Vaara; K Huotari
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Rectal Culture-Guided Targeted Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Incidence of Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Men at High Risk for Infections Submitted to Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy - Results of a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Luca Boeri; Matteo Fontana; Andrea Gallioli; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Michele Catellani; Fabrizio Longo; Barbara Mangiarotti; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Infection-Related Hospital Admissions After Prostate Biopsy in United States Men.

Authors:  Richard Evans; Aram Loeb; Keith S Kaye; Michael L Cher; Emily T Martin
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 7.  Economic evaluations and their use in infection prevention and control: a narrative review.

Authors:  Elissa Rennert-May; John Conly; Jenine Leal; Stephanie Smith; Braden Manns
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.887

8.  Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Models in Prostate Cancer: Exploring New Developments in Testing and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Edna Keeney; Howard Thom; Emma Turner; Richard M Martin; Josie Morley; Sabina Sanghera
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 9.  Strategies for prevention of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy infections.

Authors:  Diane D Lu; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.