Literature DB >> 26686044

Post-remission treatment with allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukaemia: a time-dependent analysis.

Jurjen Versluis1, Carin L E Hazenberg2, Jakob R Passweg3, Wim L J van Putten4, Johan Maertens5, Bart J Biemond6, Matthias Theobald7, Carlos Graux8, Jurgen Kuball9, Harry C Schouten10, Thomas Pabst11, Bob Löwenberg1, Gert Ossenkoppele12, Edo Vellenga2, Jan J Cornelissen13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukaemia mainly affects elderly people, with a median age at diagnosis of around 70 years. Although about 50-60% of patients enter first complete remission upon intensive induction chemotherapy, relapse remains high and overall outcomes are disappointing. Therefore, effective post-remission therapy is urgently needed. Although often no post-remission therapy is given to elderly patients, it might include chemotherapy or allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following reduced-intensity conditioning. We aimed to assess the comparative value of allogeneic HSCT with other approaches, including no post-remission therapy, in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia aged 60 years and older.
METHODS: For this time-dependent analysis, we used the results from four successive prospective HOVON-SAKK acute myeloid leukaemia trials. Between May 3, 2001, and Feb 5, 2010, a total of 1155 patients aged 60 years and older were entered into these trials, of whom 640 obtained a first complete remission after induction chemotherapy and were included in the analysis. Post-remission therapy consisted of allogeneic HSCT following reduced-intensity conditioning (n=97), gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n=110), chemotherapy (n=44), autologous HSCT (n=23), or no further treatment (n=366). Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens consisted of fludarabine combined with 2 Gy of total body irradiation (n=71), fludarabine with busulfan (n=10), or other regimens (n=16). A time-dependent analysis was done, in which allogeneic HSCT was compared with other types of post-remission therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was 5-year overall survival for all treatment groups, analysed by a time-dependent analysis.
FINDINGS: 5-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI 25-44) for patients who received an allogeneic HSCT, 21% (17-26) for those who received no additional post-remission therapy, and 26% (19-33) for patients who received either additional chemotherapy or autologous HSCT. Overall survival at 5 years was strongly affected by the European LeukemiaNET acute myeloid leukaemia risk score, with patients in the favourable risk group (n=65) having better 5-year overall survival (56% [95% CI 43-67]) than those with intermediate-risk (n=131; 23% [19-27]) or adverse-risk (n=444; 13% [8-20]) acute myeloid leukaemia. Multivariable analysis with allogeneic HSCT as a time-dependent variable showed that allogeneic HSCT was associated with better 5-year overall survival (HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·53-0·95], p=0·017) compared with non-allogeneic HSCT post-remission therapies or no post-remission therapy, especially in patients with intermediate-risk (0·82 [0·58-1·15]) or adverse-risk (0.39 [0·21-0·73]) acute myeloid leukaemia.
INTERPRETATION: Collectively, the results from these four trials suggest that allogeneic HSCT might be the preferred treatment approach in patients 60 years of age and older with intermediate-risk and adverse-risk acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission, but the comparative value should ideally be shown in a prospective randomised study. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686044     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00148-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  30 in total

Review 1.  The artful management of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jay Yang; Charles A Schiffer
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 2.  Biologic vs physiologic age in the transplant candidate.

Authors:  Andrew S Artz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

3.  Impact of progression type on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer based on randomized phase III study of S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Yasuhide Yamada; Kenji Ishido; Masahiro Gotoh; Hideaki Bando; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Tomohiro Nishina; Kenji Amagai; Keisho Chin; Yasumasa Niwa; Akihito Tsuji; Hiroshi Imamura; Masahiro Tsuda; Hirofumi Yasui; Hirofumi Fujii; Kensei Yamaguchi; Hisateru Yasui; Shuichi Hironaka; Ken Shimada; Hiroto Miwa; Chikuma Hamada; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Effectiveness of azacitidine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  A G Dinmohamed; Y van Norden; A A van de Loosdrecht; M Jongen-Lavrencic
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Gaurav Goyal; Krishna Gundabolu; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Peter T Silberstein; Vijaya Raj Bhatt
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2016-04-22

6.  Results from a multidisciplinary clinic guided by geriatric assessment before stem cell transplantation in older adults.

Authors:  Benjamin A Derman; Keriann Kordas; Jean Ridgeway; Selina Chow; William Dale; Sang Mee Lee; Elingel Aguada; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Jagoda Jasielec; Justin Kline; Satyajit Kosuri; Richard A Larson; Hongtao Liu; Mylove Mortel; Olatoyosi Odenike; Jennifer Pisano; Peter Riedell; Wendy Stock; Michael R Bishop; Andrew S Artz
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-26

7.  Added prognostic value of secondary AML-like gene mutations in ELN intermediate-risk older AML: ALFA-1200 study results.

Authors:  Claude Gardin; Cécile Pautas; Elise Fournier; Raphaël Itzykson; Emilie Lemasle; Jean-Henri Bourhis; Lionel Adès; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Jean-Valère Malfuson; Lauris Gastaud; Emmanuel Raffoux; Juliette Lambert; Thorsten Braun; Xavier Thomas; Sylvain Chantepie; Thomas Cluzeau; Stéphane de Botton; Céline Berthon; Nicolas Boissel; Nicolas Duployez; Christine Terré; Régis Peffault de Latour; Mauricette Michallet; Karine Celli-Lebras; Claude Preudhomme; Hervé Dombret
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-12

8.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients: Prognosis Determined by Disease Risk Index.

Authors:  Fiona He; Qing Cao; Aleksandr Lazaryan; Claudio Brunstein; Shernan Holtan; Erica Warlick; Celalettin Ustun; Brian McClune; Mukta Arora; Armin Rashidi; Craig Eckfeldt; Daniel J Weisdorf; Nelli Bejanyan
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Novel Prognostic and Therapeutic Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Michael Medinger; Claudia Lengerke; Jakob Passweg
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2016 09-10       Impact factor: 4.069

10.  Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: ready for prime time?

Authors:  F Baron; Y Beguin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.