| Literature DB >> 26685799 |
Sivashanmugam Raju1, Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu2, Ramanivas Sunderayan3, Mohan K Puttaswamy4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Femoral rotational landmarks may vary according to the population. Our aim is to find out the relationship of the landmarks used in total knee arthroplasty in an Indian population and compare it with reported landmarks in other ethnic populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26685799 PMCID: PMC4685629 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0333-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1MRI of the distal femur with the axes and angles. A Clinical epicondylar axis, B posterior condylar axis, C anteroposterior axis, D Whiteside-epicondylar angle, E Whiteside-posterior condylar angle, F condylar twist angle
Descriptive statistics of the rotational landmarks
| Parameters | Number of knees | Mean | Standard deviation | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTA | 124 | 5.92 | 2.32 | 0–13 |
| W-EP | 124 | 88.99 | 2.86 | 86–93 |
| W-PC | 124 | 94.09 | 2.84 | 86–99 |
Rotational landmark values of genders and sides
| Parameters | Gender/side | Number of subjects | Mean | Standard deviation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| CTA | Male | 86 | 5.77 | 2.28 | 0.307 |
| Female | 38 | 6.24 | 2.40 | ||
| W-EP | Male | 86 | 89.16 | 2.78 | 0.318 |
| Female | 38 | 88.61 | 3.03 | ||
| W-PC | Male | 86 | 94.22 | 2.75 | 0.466 |
| Female | 38 | 93.82 | 3.06 | ||
| Side | |||||
| CTA | Left | 62 | 5.90 | 2.37 | 0.95 |
| Right | 62 | 5.93 | 2.29 | ||
| W-EP | Left | 62 | 89.34 | 2.75 | 0.18 |
| Right | 62 | 88.65 | 2.94 | ||
| W-PC | Left | 62 | 94.45 | 2.96 | 0.15 |
| Right | 62 | 93.73 | 2.68 | ||
Rotational axes and angles from various studies
| Studies | Condylar twist angle (CTA) | Posterior condylar angle (PCA) | W-EP | W-PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadaveric studies | ||||
| Arima et al. [ | 4.4 (2.9) | |||
| Berger et al. [ | Male 4.7 (3.5) | Male 3.5 (1.2) | ||
| Female 5.2 (4.1) | Female 0.3 (1.2) | |||
| Yip et al. [ | Males 5.1 (1.9) | |||
| Females 5.8 (1.8) | ||||
| Yoshioka et al. [ | Male 5 (1.8) | |||
| Female 6 (2.4) | ||||
| Mantas et al. [ | Right 4.9 (2.1) | |||
| Left 4.9 (2.3) | ||||
| Male 4.4 (2) | ||||
| Female 6.4 (2.2) | ||||
| Katz et al. [ | 6.1 (3.3) | |||
| Intraoperative studies | ||||
| Poilvache et al. [ | 3.60 (2.02) | 90.33 (2.44) | 86.92 (2.71) | |
| Males 3.58 (2.16) | Male 91.2 (2.15) | Male 88.07 (2.34) | ||
| Female 3.62 (1.93) | Female 89.59 (2.45) | Female 85.94 (2.64) | ||
| Varus-neutral 3.51 (2.03) | Varus-neutral 90.53 (2.36) | Varus-neutral 87.27 (2.57) | ||
| Valgus 4.41 (1.83) | Valgus 88.73 (2.57) | Valgus 84.09 (2.21) | ||
| Griffin et al. [ | Average 3.7 (2.2) | |||
| Male 3.6 (1.8) | ||||
| Female 3.7 (2.6) | ||||
| Varus 3.3 (1.9) | ||||
| Neutral 3.3 (2.3) | ||||
| Valgus 5.4 (2.3) | ||||
| Radiograph-based studies | ||||
| Arima et al. [ | 5.7 (1.7) | |||
| CT-based studies | ||||
| Akagi et al. [ | OA knees 6.8 (1.8) | |||
| Nagamine et al. [ | Normal 5.8 (2.7) | 87.7 (3.9) | 93.5 (4) | |
| PF-OA 6.4 (2.4) | ||||
| FT-OA 6.2 (1.9) (arthritic knees) | ||||
| Yoshino et al. [ | 6.4 (1.6) (arthritic knees) | Average 3 (1.6) | ||
| Takai et al. [ | 6.8 (2) (arthritic knees) | |||
| 6.3 (1.5) (normal knees) | ||||
| Mullaji et al. [ | 5 (1.7) (normal knees) | 90.8 (3.7) | 95.8 (3.5) | |
| MRI-based studies | ||||
| Current study | 5.92 (2.32) (normal knees) | 88.99 (2.86) | 94.09 (2.84) | |
| Matsuda et al. [ | Normal 6.03 (3.60) | |||
| Varus 6 (2.35) | ||||
| Griffin et al. [ | 3.11 (1.75) | |||
| Male 2.75 (1.61) | ||||
| Female 3.33 (1.82) | ||||
| <41 years 2.71 (1.56) | ||||
| >41 years 3.50 (1.86) | ||||
Mean values are given in degrees (°). Those in brackets are the standard deviation