| Literature DB >> 26685317 |
M Portilla1, G Snodgrass2, D Streett3, R Luttrell2.
Abstract
Two artificial diets developed for rearing Lygus spp., a fresh yolk chicken egg based-diet (FYD) and a dry yolk chicken egg based-diet (DYD), were evaluated as an alternative food source for rearing the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Survival to adult was 97.3 and 74.67%, respectively, on the fresh and dry yolk diets. Insects fed FYD had 100% survival of nymphs from first through fourth instars. Adult development was significantly shorter on FYD (30.37 ± SE 0.30 d) as compared with DYD (32.77 ± SE 0.16 d). Increased male and female longevity, higher fecundity, and larger egg mass sizes were also observed with N. viridula-fed FYD. However, fertility and hatchability was higher on DYD. A complete cohort life table was constructed to describe the development of N. viridula on both diets. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of America 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.Entities:
Keywords: Lygus diet; Nezara viridula; demographic parameter; life tables; rearing
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26685317 PMCID: PMC4684188 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Feeding method for rearing N. viridula using a cotton ball soaked in 1.0% benzoic acid—RO solution impregnated with fresh yolk chicken egg-based diet (Lygus spp. diet). (A) Second instar nymphs of N. viridula feeding on diet. (B). Third through fifth instar nymphs of N. viridula feeding on diet. (C) Adults of N. viridula feeding on diet. (D) N. viridula adult female depositing an egg mass on its site for oviposition
Composition of the Lygus spp. diets for rearing N. viridula (Portilla et al. 2001)
| Components | Diets | |
|---|---|---|
| FYD | DYD | |
| Group A | ||
| Toasted wheat germ | 100 g | 100 g |
| Coarsely ground lima bean meal | 150 g | 150 g |
| Soy Flour | 25 g | 25 g |
| Yolk egg chicken | 9 yolks | |
| Dry yolk chicken egg | 40 g | |
| Water | 1000 ml | 1000 ml |
| Group B | ||
| Torula Yeast | 3 g | 3 g |
| Soy lecithin with oil | 5 g | 5 g |
| Vanderzant vitamin mixture | 4 g | 4 g |
| Streptomycin | 0.025 g | 0.025 g |
| Sucrose | 16 g | 16 g |
| Honey | 7.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Benzoic acid | 1 g | 1 g |
| Total price per liter of diet | $3.34 | $3.45 |
aPrice of these ingredients obtained in Mississippi supermarket and Sigma catalog in 2015.
Fig. 2.Developmental time of N. viridula using fresh and DYDs. For each stage, means (±SE) followed by the same letter were not significantly different (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.05)
Biological parameter of N. viridula reared on two Lygus spp. diets.
| Fitness parameters | Diets (mean ± SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYD | DYD | |||
| Female longevity (d) | 51.18 ± 3.56 a | 29.27 ± 2.86 b | 21.56 | <0.0001 |
| Male longevity (d) | 51.59 ± 3.36 a | 29.45 ± 4.44 b | 16.32 | 0.0002 |
| Fertility rate (%) | 73.14 ± 1.76 b | 92.01 ± 2.38 a | 1.66 | 0.015 |
| Hatchability rate (%) | 64.93 ± 1.81 b | 94.72 ± 1.3 a | 2.63 | <0.0001 |
| Egg mass size (number of eggs) | 58.18 ± 2.30 a | 48.08 ± 5.46 b | 2.97 | <0.0001 |
| Development to adult female (d) | 33.39 ± 0.14 b | 34.45 ± 0.25 a | 15.1 | 0.0003 |
| Development to adult male (d) | 32.96 ± 0.19 b | 34.04 ± 0.27 a | 11.05 | 0.0017 |
| Mating population percentage/day (%) | 29.913 ± 2.078 a | 27.094 ± 3.193 a | ||
Means ( ± SE) in the same row followed by the same letter were not significantly different at P > 0.05
Fig. 3.Linear regression (GLM) analysis predicting probability of mating pairs of N. viridula fed on fresh yolk chicken egg-based diet (FYD: 27 pairs) and dry yolk chicken egg-based diet (DYD: 22 pairs)
Fig. 4.Total mating and total eggs per day of N. viridula reared on two artificial diets: FYD (27 pairs) and DYD (22 pairs)
Fig. 5.Product-limit survival estimates for females and males of N. viridula reared on FYD and on DYD (P = 0.05, LIFETEST of Equality over Strata)
Fig. 6.Cumulative egg mass production/female/day of N. viridula reared on two artificial diets: FYD (9 pairs/cage) and DYD (7, 7, and 8 pairs/cage) (t-test P ≤ 0.0001)
Test of equality over Strata LIFETEST for N. viridula fed on two Lygus diets
| Test | ♀♂ FYD | ♀♂ fed DYD | ♀ fed FYD- ♀ fed DYD | ♂ fed FYD-♂ fed DYD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | DF | DF | DF | |||||||||
| Log-Rank | 0.0396 | 1 | 0.8423 | 0.8099 | 1 | 0.3685 | 19.2716 | 1 | <.0001 | 12.3349 | 1 | 0.0004 |
| Wilcoxon | 0.0054 | 1 | 0.9416 | 0.0003 | 1 | 0.9852 | 16.6599 | 1 | <.0001 | 13.1057 | 1 | 0.0003 |
| (LR)- 2Log | 0.0054 | 1 | 0.9415 | 0.2729 | 1 | 0.6014 | 5.9978 | 1 | <.0143 | 3.5001 | 1 | 0.0614 |
aHomogeneity Tests of survival curves (P ≤ 0.0001)
Demographic rates of increase of N. viridula reared on two Lygus spp. diets
| Demographic rates of increase | Diets (mean ± SE) | |
|---|---|---|
| FYD | DYD | |
| Gross fecundity (total progeny/female) ( | 395.84 ± 28.69 a | 140.30 ± 50.99 b |
| Net fecundity (progeny females/female) ( | 197.92 ± 14.34 a | 70.15 ± 25.49 b |
| Net reproductive rate (females/female/generation) ( | 130.80 ± 33.85 a | 22.61 ± 7.01 b |
| Mean generation time ( | 66.65 ± 3.14 a | 59.15 ± 3.12 a |
| Doubling time (DT) | 9.29 ± 0.23 a | 13.69 ± 1.21 b |
| Intrinsic rate of increase ( | 0.074 ± 0.0018 a | 0.051 ± 0.0041 b |
| Finite rate of increase (λ) | 1.08 ± 0.0032 a | 1.05 ± 0.0078 b |
Means ( ± SE) in the same row followed by the same letter were not significantly different at P > 0.05