Literature DB >> 26685087

A Detailed Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Large Series of Cervical and Vaginal Gastric-type Adenocarcinomas.

Claire Carleton1, Lien Hoang, Shatrughan Sah, Takako Kiyokawa, Yevgeniy S Karamurzin, Karen L Talia, Kay J Park, W Glenn McCluggage.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinomas exhibiting gastric differentiation represent a recently described and uncommon subtype of non-human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical adenocarcinoma. They comprise a spectrum from a well-differentiated variant (adenoma malignum/mucinous variant of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) to a more poorly differentiated overtly malignant form, generally referred to as gastric-type adenocarcinoma. Rarely, such tumors have also been described as primary vaginal neoplasms. Gastric-type adenocarcinomas exhibit considerable morphologic overlap with adenocarcinomas originating outside the female genital tract, especially mucinous adenocarcinomas arising in the pancreas and biliary tract. Moreover, they often metastasize to unusual sites, such as the ovary and peritoneum/omentum, where they can be mistaken for metastatic adenocarcinomas from other, nongynecologic sites. There is little information regarding the immunophenotype of gastric-type adenocarcinomas, and knowledge of this is important to aid in the distinction from other adenocarcinomas. In this study, we undertook a detailed immunohistochemical analysis of a large series of cervical (n=45) and vaginal (n=2) gastric-type adenocarcinomas. Markers included were cytokeratin (CK)7, CK20, CDX2, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, CA19.9, p16, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, MUC6, PAX8, PAX2, p53, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta, carbonic anhydrase IX, human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. All markers were classified as negative, focal (<50% of tumor cells positive), or diffuse (≥50% tumor cells positive) except for p53 (classified as "wild-type" or "mutation-type"), HER2 (scored using the College of American Pathologists guidelines for gastric carcinomas), and MMR proteins (categorized as retained or lost). There was positive staining with CK7 (47/47-45 diffuse, 2 focal), MUC6 (17/21-6 diffuse, 11 focal), carcinoembryonic antigen (25/31-12 diffuse, 13 focal), carbonic anhydrase IX (20/24-8 diffuse, 12 focal), PAX8 (32/47-20 diffuse, 12 focal), CA125 (36/45-5 diffuse, 31 focal), CA19.9 (11/11-8 diffuse, 3 focal), hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (13/14-12 diffuse, 1 focal), CDX2 (24/47-4 diffuse, 20 focal), CK20 (23/47-6 diffuse, 17 focal), and p16 (18/47-4 diffuse, 14 focal). Most cases were negative with estrogen receptor (29/31), progesterone receptor (10/11), PAX2 (18/19), and HER2 (25/26). p53 showed "wild-type" and "mutation-type" staining in 27 of 46 and 19 of 46 cases, respectively. MMR protein expression was retained in 19 of 20 cases with loss of MSH6 staining in 1 patient with Lynch syndrome. Molecular studies for HPV were undertaken in 2 tumors, which exhibited diffuse "block-type" immunoreactivity with p16, and both were negative. This is the first detailed immunohistochemical study of a large series of gastric-type adenocarcinomas of the lower female genital tract. Our results indicate immunophenotypic overlap with pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas but suggest that PAX8 immunoreactivity may be especially useful in distinguishing gastric-type adenocarcinomas from pancreaticobiliary and other nongynecologic adenocarcinomas, which are usually negative. Diffuse "block-type" p16 immunoreactivity in a cervical adenocarcinoma is not necessarily indicative of a high-risk HPV-associated tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26685087      PMCID: PMC5564425          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  44 in total

1.  Cervical adenocarcinoma in a patient with Lynch syndrome, Muir-Torre variant.

Authors:  Navya Nair; John P Curtin; Khushbakhat Mittal; Karen L Hiotis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Patterns of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinomas: 'all or nothing' staining is of importance.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Comparative analysis of Napsin A, alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR, P504S), and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta as diagnostic markers of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 279 ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Chengquan Zhao; Dineo Khabele; Vinita Parkash; Charles M Quick; Katja Gwin; Mohamed M Desouki
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Absence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in endocervical adenocarcinoma with gastric morphology and phenotype.

Authors:  Yasuki Kusanagi; Atsumi Kojima; Yoshiki Mikami; Takako Kiyokawa; Tamotsu Sudo; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Ryuichiro Nishimura
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  The p53 tumor suppressor gene frequently is altered in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  A Berchuck; M F Kohler; J R Marks; R Wiseman; J Boyd; R C Bast
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ with ovarian metastases: a unique variant with potential for long-term survival.

Authors:  Martin C Chang; Nicole S Nevadunsky; Akila N Viswanathan; Christopher P Crum; Colleen M Feltmate
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2.

Authors:  W G McCluggage; R Shah; L E Connolly; H A McBride
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Prognostic significance of the overexpression of c-erbB-2 protein in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  T Kihana; H Tsuda; S Teshima; K Nomoto; S Tsugane; T Sonoda; S Matsuura; S Hirohashi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Human papillomavirus-unrelated gastric type of cervical adenocarcinoma presenting with a metastatic ovarian tumor: report of a case.

Authors:  Yuh-Yu Chou; Ming-Chieh Lin; Lee-Wen Huang
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Carbonic anhydrase type IX expression in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Yoshiki Mikami; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Norihiro Teramoto; Michikazu Nagura; Hironori Haga; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.250

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  The central role of the pathologist in the management of patients with cervical cancer: ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Sigurd F Lax; W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Diagnostic Algorithmic Proposal Based on Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of 297 Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Luis Chiriboga; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Genetic characteristics of gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Eunhyang Park; Sang Wun Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jung-Yun Lee; Young Tae Kim; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Recent advances in invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Lien Hoang; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): A New Pathogenetic Classification for Invasive Adenocarcinomas of the Endocervix.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Fallopian Tube Mucosal Involvement in Cervical Gastric-type Adenocarcinomas: Report of a Series With Discussion of the Distinction From Synchronous In Situ Tubal Lesions.

Authors:  Simon Rajendran; Yaser Hussein; Kay J Park; W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Immunophenotype analysis using CLDN18, CDH17, and PAX8 for the subcategorization of endocervical adenocarcinomas in situ: gastric-type, intestinal-type, gastrointestinal-type, and Müllerian-type.

Authors:  Shiho Asaka; Tomoyuki Nakajima; Kaori Kugo; Risako Kashiwagi; Nozomi Yazaki; Tsutomu Miyamoto; Takeshi Uehara; Hiroyoshi Ota
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Morphologic Features of Gastric-type Cervical Adenocarcinoma in Small Surgical and Cytology Specimens.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Elizabeth G Morency; Mihaela Kracun; Deborah F DeLair; Sarah Chiang; Robert A Soslow; Kay J Park; Rajmohan Murali
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  Cervical carcinomas with serous-like papillary and micropapillary components: illustrating the heterogeneity of primary cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  Richard Wing-Cheuk Wong; Joshua Hoi Yan Ng; Kam Chu Han; Yuen Ping Leung; Chiu Man Shek; Kin Nam Cheung; Carmen Ka Man Choi; Ka Yu Tse; Philip P C Ip
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Clinicopathological and Molecular Differences Between Gastric-type Mucinous Carcinoma and Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Hera Jung; Go Eun Bae; Hye Min Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.