Literature DB >> 2668506

Comparison between guided and freehand preparation.

L Mollersten1.   

Abstract

Parallel pin retention is traditional in restorative dentistry and provides a conservative approach to removal of tooth structure, including restorations with supragingival margins. However, the question of whether pinhole preparations should be performed freehand or by using a paralleling instrument has been frequently discussed. This investigation compared the precision of freehand and instrument-guided preparations under simulated clinical conditions. The results indicated that guided preparations provided better paralleling precision than freehand preparations, but did not exclude success by the freehand approach. Both instrument preparation and freehand preparation were influenced by the dentist's dexterity and technical capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668506     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90298-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  1 in total

1.  An audit of cavity and crown preparations and two direct restorations carried out by foundation dentists in the Oxford and Wessex Deaneries.

Authors:  F J T Burke; L Mackenzie; H Falcon; N Priest; W M Palin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.