Literature DB >> 26684728

Relative importance of evolutionary dynamics depends on the composition of microbial predator-prey community.

Ville-Petri Friman1,2, Alessandra Dupont3, David Bass3, David J Murrell4, Thomas Bell1.   

Abstract

Community dynamics are often studied in subsets of pairwise interactions. Scaling pairwise interactions back to the community level is, however, problematic because one given interaction might not reflect ecological and evolutionary outcomes of other functionally similar species interactions or capture the emergent eco-evolutionary dynamics arising only in more complex communities. Here we studied this experimentally by exposing Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 prey bacterium to four different protist predators (Tetrahymena pyriformis, Tetrahymena vorax, Chilomonas paramecium and Acanthamoeba polyphaga) in all possible single-predator, two-predator and four-predator communities for hundreds of prey generations covering both ecological and evolutionary timescales. We found that only T. pyriformis selected for prey defence in single-predator communities. Although T. pyriformis selection was constrained in the presence of the intraguild predator, T. vorax, T. pyriformis selection led to evolution of specialised prey defence strategies in the presence of C. paramecium or A. polyphaga. At the ecological level, adapted prey populations were phenotypically more diverse, less stable and less productive compared with non-adapted prey populations. These results suggest that predator community composition affects the relative importance of ecological and evolutionary processes and can crucially determine when rapid evolution has the potential to change ecological properties of microbial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26684728      PMCID: PMC5029191          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  32 in total

1.  Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system.

Authors:  Takehito Yoshida; Laura E Jones; Stephen P Ellner; Gregor F Fussmann; Nelson G Hairston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coevolutionary alternation in antagonistic interactions.

Authors:  Scott L Nuismer; John N Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The geographic selection mosaic for ponderosa pine and crossbills: a tale of two squirrels.

Authors:  Thomas L Parchman; Craig W Benkman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea.

Authors:  J R Stinchcombe; M D Rausher
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Rapid prey evolution can alter the structure of predator-prey communities.

Authors:  V-P Friman; A Jousset; A Buckling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Effects of predation on real-time host-parasite coevolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Ville-Petri Friman; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  P B Rainey; M Travisano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Bacterial adaptation to sublethal antibiotic gradients can change the ecological properties of multitrophic microbial communities.

Authors:  Ville-Petri Friman; Laura Melissa Guzman; Daniel C Reuman; Thomas Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Importance of positioning for microbial evolution.

Authors:  Wook Kim; Fernando Racimo; Jonas Schluter; Stuart B Levy; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  In the polymorphic ciliate Tetrahymena vorax, the non-selective phagocytosis seen in microstomes changes to a highly selective process in macrostomes.

Authors:  Heidi K Grønlien; Trond Berg; Arne M Løvlie
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evolutionary contribution to coexistence of competitors in microbial food webs.

Authors:  Teppo Hiltunen; Veijo Kaitala; Jouni Laakso; Lutz Becks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato.

Authors:  Xiaofang Wang; Zhong Wei; Keming Yang; Jianing Wang; Alexandre Jousset; Yangchun Xu; Qirong Shen; Ville-Petri Friman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils.

Authors:  Zhi-Bo Zhao; Ji-Zheng He; Stefan Geisen; Li-Li Han; Jun-Tao Wang; Ju-Pei Shen; Wen-Xue Wei; Yun-Ting Fang; Pei-Pei Li; Li-Mei Zhang
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 14.650

4.  The genetic architecture underlying prey-dependent performance in a microbial predator.

Authors:  Balint Stewart; Nicole Gruenheit; Amy Baldwin; Rex Chisholm; Daniel Rozen; Adrian Harwood; Jason B Wolf; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Bacteriophage: A Useful Tool for Studying Gut Bacteria Function of Housefly Larvae, Musca domestica.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Shumin Wang; Ting Li; Qian Zhang; Ruiling Zhang; Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-08-11

Review 6.  Experimental Evolution in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  Karissa Plum; Jason Tarkington; Rebecca A Zufall
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.