Literature DB >> 26684431

Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading.

Dominika Ignasiak1, Sebastian Dendorfer2, Stephen J Ferguson3.   

Abstract

Musculoskeletal modeling offers an invaluable insight into the spine biomechanics. A better understanding of thoracic spine kinetics is essential for understanding disease processes and developing new prevention and treatment methods. Current models of the thoracic region are not designed for segmental load estimation, or do not include the complex construct of the ribcage, despite its potentially important role in load transmission. In this paper, we describe a numerical musculoskeletal model of the thoracolumbar spine with articulated ribcage, modeled as a system of individual vertebral segments, elastic elements and thoracic muscles, based on a previously established lumbar spine model and data from the literature. The inverse dynamics simulations of the model allow the prediction of spinal loading as well as costal joints kinetics and kinematics. The intradiscal pressure predicted by the model correlated well (R(2)=0.89) with reported intradiscal pressure measurements, providing a first validation of the model. The inclusion of the ribcage did not affect segmental force predictions when the thoracic spine did not perform motion. During thoracic motion tasks, the ribcage had an important influence on the predicted compressive forces and muscle activation patterns. The compressive forces were reduced by up to 32%, or distributed more evenly between thoracic vertebrae, when compared to the predictions of the model without ribcage, for mild thoracic flexion and hyperextension tasks, respectively. The presented musculoskeletal model provides a tool for investigating thoracic spine loading and load sharing between vertebral column and ribcage during dynamic activities. Further validation for specific applications is still necessary.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse dynamics; Musculoskeletal model; Thoracolumbar spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26684431     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Tobias Peteler; Tamás F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of muscle ageing and sarcopenia on spinal segmental loads.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Waldo Valenzuela; Mauricio Reyes; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar spine loads are reduced for activities of daily living when using a braced arm-to-thigh technique.

Authors:  Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau; Scott C E Brandon; William S P Robertson; Robert Fraser; Brian J C Freeman; Ryan B Graham; Dominic Thewlis; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Is T9-11 the true thoracolumbar transition zone?

Authors:  J Murphy; E McLoughlin; A M Davies; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-10

7.  Finite element study of the impact of pedicle screw density on the biomechanical response of a Lenke 1AN scoliotic curve.

Authors:  Justin M Warren; Lloyd A Hey; Andre P Mazzoleni
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-18

8.  Biomechanical Properties of Paraspinal Muscles Influence Spinal Loading-A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; C Antonio Sanchez; Stephen H M Brown; John Street; Sidney Fels; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

9.  The rib cage: a new element in the spinopelvic chain.

Authors:  Marc Khalifé; Claudio Vergari; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Valérie Attali; Cécile Heidsieck; Ayman Assi; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.721

10.  A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Solving Spine Kinematics While Calibrating Subject-Specific Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Dongmei Wang; Antoine Falisse; Pieter Severijns; Thomas Overbergh; Lieven Moke; Lennart Scheys; Friedl De Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.