Literature DB >> 26684338

Early-onset dropped head syndrome after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: dose constraints for neck extensor muscles.

Koji Inaba1, Satoshi Nakamura2, Hiroyuki Okamoto2, Tairo Kashihara2, Kazuma Kobayashi2, Ken Harada2, Mayuka Kitaguchi2, Shuhei Sekii2, Kana Takahashi2, Naoya Murakami2, Yoshinori Ito2, Hiroshi Igaki2, Takashi Uno3, Jun Itami2.   

Abstract

Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a famous but unusual late complication of multimodality treatment for head and neck carcinoma. We reported this early-onset complication and analyzed the dose to the neck extensor muscles. We examined the records of three patients with DHS after radiotherapy. The doses to the neck extensor muscles were compared between three patients with DHS and nine patients without DHS. The mean dose to the neck extensor muscles of the three patients with DHS were 58.5 Gy, 42.3 Gy and 60.9 Gy, while the dose was <50 Gy in all nine patients in the control group. The onset of this syndrome was 5 months, 6 months and 15 months. The early-onset DHS may have something to do with dose to the neck extensor muscles. The proposed dose to the neck extensor muscles might be <46 Gy (or at least <50 Gy).
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemoradiotherapy; dose constraints to the neck extensor muscles; early-onset dropped head syndrome; radiotherapy; unusual complication

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26684338      PMCID: PMC4795943          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrv055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


INTRODUCTION

Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is caused by various neuromuscular disorders [1-8]. It is also a famous but rare complication of radiotherapy [6]. This syndrome is characterized by weakness of neck extensor muscles, causing an inability to extend the neck and resulting in the patient's posture having the head flexed forward. The etiology and treatment remain unclear due to its rarity. This syndrome has been reported as a late-onset complication following radiotherapy [6]. Recently, a few case reports have been published about early-onset DHS after multimodality treatment for head and neck carcinoma [7, 8]. We have had experience of three patients with early-onset DHS. These patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck carcinoma. This study was conducted to report this rare complication, to analyze the dose to the neck extensor muscles, and to propose dose constraints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have had experience of three patients with DHS following radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. Details of patient characteristics, treatment and clinical course are described. The irradiated dose to the neck extensor muscles was analyzed. The neck extensor muscles were contoured, including the splenius muscles, semispinalis muscles, and spinalis muscles. The doses to the neck extensor muscles were compared between the three patients with DHS and the nine patients without DHS as a control. The dose to the right, left and both neck extensor muscles was analyzed. The compared parameters were mean dose, V10 Gy, V20 Gy, V30 Gy, V40 Gy, V50 Gy, V60 Gy and V70 Gy (%). The control group patients were selected because they were irradiated with IMRT in the same time period and the level V area was included in the radiation fields (located in close vicinity to the neck extensor muscles). Six patients had nasopharyngeal carcinoma, two patients had oropharyngeal carcinoma, and the remaining patient had hypopharyngeal carcinoma. One patient with oropharyngeal carcinoma and two patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated using radiotherapy alone, and the others were treated using chemoradiotherapy. Our institutional review board (The National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board, Japan) approved this study.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the details of the patients with DHS. Patient 1 was a 62-year-old man with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal carcinomas treated with chemoradiotherapy; he presented with head drop 5 months after completion of radiotherapy. The patient suffered from pain and bending deformity of the neck, and disturbed daily activity. The physical examination, CT and MRI showed no atrophy of the neck extensor muscles. The disease relapsed at the left hilar and mediastinal lymph node 13 months after radiotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy was administered without response. The patient was observed for 22 months after the occurrence of DHS, and the symptoms were slightly improved despite the salvage chemotherapy. IMRT was applied to the treatment of the hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The mean dose to the neck extensor muscles was 58.5 Gy/35 fractions. A total of two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy of 5FU (700 mg/m2 Days 1–4) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 Day 1) were administered.
Table 1.

Patients' characteristics

AgeSexDiseaseStageTreatmentRadiotherapyChemotherapyMean dose to neck extensor muscles/fractionsLatent period
Patient 162MHypopharyngeal carcinomaT3N2bM0CRTIMRT 70 Gy for hypopharyngeal carcinomaCDDP + 5FU58.5 Gy/35 fractions5 months
Esophageal carcinomaT3N2M03DCRT 60 Gy for esophageal carcinoma
Patient 273FNasopharyngeal carcinomaT2N0M0RTIMRT 70 Gy and additional 3DCRT 10 Gy for primary disease42.3 Gy/40 fractions6 months
Patient 355MNasopharyngeal carcinomaT1N2M0CRTIMRT 70 GyCDDP60.9 Gy/35 fractions15 months

CRT = chemoradiotherapy; RT = radiotherapy; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy; 3DCRT = 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Patients' characteristics CRT = chemoradiotherapy; RT = radiotherapy; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy; 3DCRT = 3D conformal radiotherapy. Patient 2 was a 73-year-old woman with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy alone, and she presented with head drop 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. The patient suffered from pain with neck bending. The physical examination and MRI showed no atrophy of the neck extensor muscles. She had no recurrence and was observed for 8 months after the onset of DHS. The symptoms did not change. The radiotherapy dose was 70 Gy/35 fractions for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and, additionally, 10 Gy/5 fractions were prescribed as a boost for the primary disease because the tumor response was not good. Mean dose to the neck extensor muscles was 42.3 Gy/40 fractions. Patient 3 was a 55-year-old man with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy, and he presented with head drop 15 months after completion of radiotherapy. The patient suffered from pain with neck bending. The physical examination, CT and MRI showed no atrophy of the neck extensor muscles. His symptom of DHS was slightly improved till 19 months after the onset of DHS. The mean dose to the neck extensor muscles was 60.9 Gy/35 fractions. A total of three cycles of concurrent chemotherapy of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 Day 1) were administered. Additionally, two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy of 5FU (700 mg/m2 Days 1–5) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 Day 1) were administered. Figure 1 shows the DVHs of the neck extensor muscles of all 12 patients, and Table 2 shows doses analyses for both, right and left neck extensor muscles. Two of the three patients with DHS were exposed to >50 Gy mean dose to the neck extensor muscles. Patients without DHS were exposed to <50 Gy mean dose to the neck extensor muscles. One patient with DHS was irradiated by only 42.3 Gy mean dose to the neck extensor muscles. The dose to the right and left neck extensor muscles was not different in the patients with DHS. The comparison of the dose–volume histogram analysis revealed V60 Gy and V70 Gy were significantly greater in the patients with DHS compared with in those without DHS. The mean value of V60 Gy and V70 Gy was 32.7 and 7.0% in the patients with DHS, and 5.7 and 0.4% in the patients without DHS. The onset time was 5 months, 6 months and 15 months after radiotherapy, and the latency period did not seem to be related to dose to the neck extensor muscles.
Fig. 1.

Dose–volume histogram of the neck extensor muscles of three patients with dropped head syndrome and nine patients without dropped head syndrome.

Table 2.

The comparison of dose to the neck extensor muscles between patients with and without dropped head syndrome

Both neck extensor musclesPatient 1 (DHS +)Patient 2 (DHS +)Patient 3 (DHS +)DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS –DHS + meanDHS – meanP value
Mean dose (Gy)58.542.360.947.329.245.730.649.735.547.242.749.653.941.90.061
V10 Gy (%)1001001001001001001001001001009710010099.70.58
V20 Gy10010010010010010096100991009410010098.80.37
V30 Gy100991001002888469974100879699.779.80.22
V40 Gy996610083106812884077617688.357.20.12
V50 Gy80119835035448936195363.026.60.068
V60 Gy470515010040662032.75.70.015*
V70 Gy100110010000217.00.40.0056*
Rt neck extensor muscles
Mean dose (Gy)60.242.260.348.027.944.725.652.737.146.141.346.854.241.10.065
V10 Gy (%)1001001001001001001001001001009810010099.80.58
V20 Gy10010010010010010093100991009510010098.60.38
V30 Gy1009810010018861610080100839699.375.40.26
V40 Gy10065100836640994375567088.355.10.14
V50 Gy871196400330671331124364.726.60.075
V60 Gy5314760909020833.73.80.0070*
V70 Gy130120010000008.30.10.0035*
Lt neck extensor muscles
Mean dose (Gy)57.342.461.446.530.646.635.147.333.948.244.152.453.742.70.070
V10 Gy (%)1001001001001001001001001001009710010099.70.58
V20 Gy100100100100100100100100991009410010099.20.52
V30 Gy100991001003990739869100919799.784.10.23
V40 Gy976810083157223773679688188.359.30.11
V50 Gy77109930037728640276462.026.60.081
V60 Gy46055401100011123133.77.70.035*
V70 Gy60110000000425.70.70.022*

P < 0.05; DHS = dropped head syndrome.

Dose–volume histogram of the neck extensor muscles of three patients with dropped head syndrome and nine patients without dropped head syndrome. The comparison of dose to the neck extensor muscles between patients with and without dropped head syndrome P < 0.05; DHS = dropped head syndrome.

DISCUSSION

Three patients with early-onset DHS are described in this report. The mechanism of this syndrome remains unclear. Previous reported cases of DHS are summarized in Table 3. Cases 1–3 in Table 3 (reported by Rowin et al.) presented with DHS many years after radiotherapy, and all three cases showed muscle atrophy [6]. Patients with DHS in our study differed from those of Rowin et al.'s report in that the onset was considerably earlier, the neck extensor muscles did not show atrophy, and the symptoms improved slightly. We consider that the early-onset DHS differs from late-onset DHS. Recently, early-onset DHS has been reported (Case 4–9 in Table 3) [7, 8]. In contrast to the findings of our study, neck extensor muscle atrophy was observed in the reported cases of early-onset DHS. The causes of this difference remain unknown. Two of the three patients with DHS were exposed to >50 Gy to the neck extensor muscles, whereas the neck extensor muscles in all nine patients without DHS were exposed to <50 Gy. Our hospital used 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for head and neck carcinomas until February 2006. From March 2006, IMRT has been employed. IMRT has various advantages in head and neck radiotherapy for protecting the salivary gland, spinal cord, brain stem, brain, bone, thyroid, constrictor muscles, optic nerve and chiasma, and internal ear. However, in protecting these organs from higher doses than the tolerances, hot spot areas can appear in other regions. Hot spot appeared to the neck extensor muscles in patients with DHS. Because of spinal cord sparing and posterior neck boost irradiation using electron beams in 3DCRT, the neck extensor muscles were exposed to between 40–46 Gy, and there were no early-onset DHS patients seen in our hospital. From these results, we consider that the radiotherapy dose is associated with this early-onset DHS; therefore, we propose a dose constraint to the neck extensor muscles of <46–50 Gy. Long-term follow-up and additional cases are needed in order to elucidate the cause and treatment of this early-onset DHS.
Table 3.

Previous reported cases of dropped head syndrome

No.AgeSexDiseaseStageTreatmentRadiotherapyChemotherapyLatent periodMuscle atrophySymptom improvement
1 [6]51MHodgkin's LymphomaMantle field irradiation2 years+
2 [6]56MHodgkin's LymphomaWhole body radiation for initial treatment/Radiation therapy to the low back for recurrent disease15 years+
3 [6]53FHodgkin's LymphomaMantle field irradiation and groin radiation therapyMOPP26 years+
4 [7]55Hypopharyngeal carcinomaT3N3M0Total laryngectomy, right modified radical neck dissection and radiotherapy66 Gy/33 fractions2 months+No
5 [7]62Oropharyngeal carcinomaT1N2cM0Laser resection, NAC and CRT/ salvage neck dissection68 Gy/34 fractionsTaxotere, CDDP, 5FU/CDDP6 months+No
6 [7]52MOral cavity carcinomaT4aN2cM0Partial glossectomy, bilateral neck dissection and CRT66 Gy/33 fractionsCDDP3 months+No
7 [7]63Oropharyngeal carcinomaT4N2cM0NAC (TPF) and CRT68 Gy/34 fractionsTPF/CDDP4 months+
8 [7]51FOropharyngeal carcinomaT4N2bM0NAC (TPF) and CRT68 Gy/34 fractionsTPF/CDDP5 months+
9 [8]53FLaryngeal carcinomaT3N2M0CRT and bilateral neck dissection75.8 GyCDDPImmediately after surgery+No

NAC = neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; TPF = docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU.

Previous reported cases of dropped head syndrome NAC = neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; TPF = docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU.

FUNDING

This work was supported partially by Health and Labour Sciences Research Expenses for Commission (H26-applied-general-036) and the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED.
  8 in total

1.  Treatable dropped head syndrome in hypothyroidism.

Authors:  H Askmark; Y Olsson; S Rossitti
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Late appearance of dropped head syndrome after radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Julie Rowin; Grace Cheng; Steven L Lewis; Matthew N Meriggioli
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  The dropped head syndrome.

Authors:  G A Suarez; J J Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Isolated head drop triggered by neck surgery following concomitant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jin Jun Luo
Journal:  J Clin Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2008-03

5.  Head drop syndrome secondary to multimodality treatments for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ian Smillie; David Ellul; Richard Townsley; Allan James; Brian Clark; Richard K H Petty; Louise Clark
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Early or late appearance of "dropped head syndrome" in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  M Gourie-Devi; A Nalini; S Sandhya
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Focal myopathy as a cause of anterocollis in Parkinsonism.

Authors:  N S Lava; S A Factor
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.338

8.  Isolated neck extensor myopathy: a common cause of dropped head syndrome.

Authors:  J S Katz; G I Wolfe; D K Burns; W W Bryan; J L Fleckenstein; R J Barohn
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bracing to treat dropped head syndrome in cancer patients: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Sasha E Knowlton; Mimi Zheng; Yoni Diamond; Michelle Yakaboski; Lisa M Ruppert
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2020-03-31

2.  Early-Onset Dropped Head Syndrome and Person-in-the-Barrel Syndrome After Radiation Therapy: Clinical, Electromyographic, and MRI Findings.

Authors:  Lisa B Shields; Vasudeva G Iyer; Jiancong Liang; Yi Ping Zhang; Christopher B Shields
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.