Jin-Peng He1, Yun Hao1, Xiao-Lin Wang1, Xiao-Jin Yang1, Jing-Fan Shao1, Jie-Xiong Feng2. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. fengjiexiong@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to retrospectively analyze the accuracy of different methods in differentiating biliary atresia from neonatal jaundice. METHODS: A search was made in MEDLINE, and the Web of Science for relevant original articles published in English; methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Studies were pooled, summary receiver operating characteristics curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: For diagnosis of biliary atresia, ultrasonography (US), hepatic scintigraphy (HBS), and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) had a pooled sensitivity of 74.9% (range: 70.4%-79.1%), 93.4% (range: 90.3%-95.7%) and 89.7% (range: 84.8%-93.4%), a specificity of 93.4% (range: 91.4%-95.1%), 69.2% (range: 65.1%-73.1%) and 64.7% (range: 58.0%-71.0%), a positive likelihood ratio of 12.16 (range: 6.41-23.08), 3.01 (range: 2.15-4.20) and 3.10 (range: 1.59-6.06), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (range: 0.13-0.38), 0.13 (range: 0.06-0.25) and 0.16 (range: 0.06-0.44), DOR of 72.56 (range: 27.34-192.58), 29.88 (range: 12.82-69.64) and 32.48 (range: 8.22-128.29), with an area under the curve of 0.96, 0.91, and 0.92, and Q value of 0.90, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: US, HBS and MRCP can be very useful for the diagnostic work-up of neonatal cholestasis. To improve the sensitivity and specificity, several additional measures can be used.
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to retrospectively analyze the accuracy of different methods in differentiating biliary atresia from neonatal jaundice. METHODS: A search was made in MEDLINE, and the Web of Science for relevant original articles published in English; methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Studies were pooled, summary receiver operating characteristics curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: For diagnosis of biliary atresia, ultrasonography (US), hepatic scintigraphy (HBS), and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) had a pooled sensitivity of 74.9% (range: 70.4%-79.1%), 93.4% (range: 90.3%-95.7%) and 89.7% (range: 84.8%-93.4%), a specificity of 93.4% (range: 91.4%-95.1%), 69.2% (range: 65.1%-73.1%) and 64.7% (range: 58.0%-71.0%), a positive likelihood ratio of 12.16 (range: 6.41-23.08), 3.01 (range: 2.15-4.20) and 3.10 (range: 1.59-6.06), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (range: 0.13-0.38), 0.13 (range: 0.06-0.25) and 0.16 (range: 0.06-0.44), DOR of 72.56 (range: 27.34-192.58), 29.88 (range: 12.82-69.64) and 32.48 (range: 8.22-128.29), with an area under the curve of 0.96, 0.91, and 0.92, and Q value of 0.90, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: US, HBS and MRCP can be very useful for the diagnostic work-up of neonatal cholestasis. To improve the sensitivity and specificity, several additional measures can be used.
Authors: Virginia Moyer; Deborah K Freese; Peter F Whitington; Alan D Olson; Fred Brewer; Richard B Colletti; Melvin B Heyman Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Marcello Napolitano; Stéphanie Franchi-Abella; Beatrice Maria Damasio; Thomas Angell Augdal; Fred Efraim Avni; Costanza Bruno; Kassa Darge; Damjana Ključevšek; Annemieke Simone Littooij; Luisa Lobo; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Michael Riccabona; Samuel Stafrace; Seema Toso; Magdalena Maria Woźniak; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli; Lil-Sofie Ording Müller; Philippe Petit Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Benjamin L Shneider; Jeff Moore; Nanda Kerkar; John C Magee; Wen Ye; Saul J Karpen; Binita M Kamath; Jean P Molleston; Jorge A Bezerra; Karen F Murray; Kathleen M Loomes; Peter F Whitington; Philip Rosenthal; Robert H Squires; Stephen L Guthery; Ronen Arnon; Kathleen B Schwarz; Yumirle P Turmelle; Averell H Sherker; Ronald J Sokol Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jan Stovicek; Stepan Hlava; Radan Keil; Jiri Drabek; Jindra Lochmannova; Petra Koptová; Martin Wasserbauer; Barbora Frybova; Jiri Snajdauf; Radana Kotalova; Michal Rygl Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-06-24