| Literature DB >> 26684267 |
Anna Wójcik-Gryciuk1,2, Małgorzata Skup2, Wioletta J Waleszczyk2.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a chronic optic neuropathy characterized by progressive damage to the optic nerve, death of retinal ganglion cells and ultimately visual field loss. It is one of the leading causes of irreversible loss of vision worldwide. The most important trigger of glaucomatous damage is elevated eye pressure, and the current standard approach in glaucoma therapy is reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). However, despite the use of effective medications or surgical treatment leading to lowering of IOP, progression of glaucomatous changes and loss of vision among patients with glaucoma is common. Therefore, it is critical to prevent vision loss through additional treatment. To implement such treatment(s), it is imperative to identify pathophysiological changes in glaucoma and develop therapeutic methods taking into account neuroprotection. Currently, there is no method of neuroprotection with long-term proven effectiveness in the treatment of glaucoma. Among the most promising molecules shown to protect the retina and optic nerve are neurotrophic factors. Thus, the current focus is on the development of safe and non-invasive methods for the long-term elevation of the intraocular level of neurotrophins through advanced gene therapy and topical eye treatment and on the search for selective agonists of neurotrophin receptors affording more efficient neuroprotection.Entities:
Keywords: Neurodegeneration; neuroprotection; optic disc; retina; retinal ganglion cells; trophic factors; visual cortex; visual pathway
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26684267 PMCID: PMC4927811 DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci ISSN: 0922-6028 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig.1Photograph of the left eye of a patient with glaucoma and printout of another patient’s examination showing severe impairment of the visual field of the right eye. A. Note the extension of the optic disc cup characteristic of glaucomatous damage. Examination with achromatic perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer) revealed coexisting impairment of the patient’s visual field. B. The recorded threshold sensitivities of a patient with glaucomatous vision impairment shown on a numeric scale. C. A graphical representation of the sensitivities recorded in B. The central 60 deg in the diameter of the visual field was tested. Regions of decreased sensitivity have lower numerical values and are shown in darker tones. The vision of the patient is limited almost exclusively to the central region of the visual field with an island on the temporal side.
Fig.2Flow diagram showing key factors involved in the pathogenesis of glaucoma triggered by elevated intraocular pressure and its structural and functional consequences. IOP – intraocular pressure; LGN – lateral geniculate nucleus; ON – optic nerve; RGC – retinal ganglion cell; SC – superior colliculus.
Fig.3Summary of the effect of selective Y-block on the upper cut-off velocities, i.e., the highest velocities of moving photic stimuli at which any response could be evoked in cat SC. In control cats, the upper cut-off velocities for stimuli presented via the ipsilateral eye were usually very similar or slightly lower than those for stimuli presented via the contralateral eye (A and C). By contrast, the upper cut-off velocities for stimuli presented via the ipsilateral (normal) eye were significantly higher than those for stimuli presented via the Y-blocked, contralateral eye (B and C). There was, however, no difference between the upper cut-off velocities of collicular neurons for stimuli presented via the ipsilateral eye in control cats and the upper cut-off velocities for stimuli presented via the ipsilateral eye of Y-blocked cats. As indicated in Fig. 3C, the upper cut-off velocities for stimuli presented via the Y-blocked contralateral eye were significantly lower than those for stimuli presented via the normal contralateral eye (This figure is a modified part of Fig. 9 from Waleszczyk, Wang, Benedek, Burke, & Dreher, 2004, with permission from Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis).