Literature DB >> 26683508

Value of Imaging Part I: Perspectives for the Academic Radiologist.

Phuong-Anh T Duong1, Brian Bresnahan2, David A Pastel3, Gelareh Sadigh4, David Ballard5, Joseph C Sullivan6, Karen Buch7, Richard Duszak8.   

Abstract

With payers and policymakers increasingly scrutinizing the value of medical imaging, opportunities abound for radiologists and radiology health services researchers to meaningfully and rigorously demonstrate value. Part one of this two-part series on the value of imaging explores the concept of value in health care from the perspective of multiple stakeholders and discusses the opportunities and challenges for radiologists and health service researchers to demonstrate value. The current absence of meaningful national value metrics also presents an opportunity for radiologists to take the lead on the discussions of these metrics that may serve as the basis for future value-based payments. As both practitioners and investigators, radiologists should consider the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in all they do-interdisciplinary support and cooperation are essential to the success of value-focused imaging research and initiatives that improve patient outcomes. Radiology departments that align their cultures, infrastructures, and incentives to support these initiatives will greatly increase their chances of being successful in these endeavors.
Copyright © 2016 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness; Health services research; Imaging; Radiology; Value of imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26683508     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

Review 1.  Automated Protocoling for MRI Exams-Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Jonas Denck; Oliver Haas; Jens Guehring; Andreas Maier; Eva Rothgang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Computed tomography technologist notes in PACS to radiologists: what are they telling us and how does it increase value?

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Sanaz Javadi; Priya Bhosale; Ahmed W Moawad; Mohammed Saleh; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Ajaykumar C Morani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-07

Review 3.  Radiology Consultation in the Era of Precision Oncology: A Review of Consultation Models and Services in the Tertiary Setting.

Authors:  Pamela J DiPiro; Katherine M Krajewski; Angela A Giardino; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Abbreviated MRI of the Breast: Does It Provide Value?

Authors:  Doris Leithner; Linda Moy; Elizabeth A Morris; Maria A Marino; Thomas H Helbich; Katja Pinker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.813

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.