Literature DB >> 26682866

Neural representations and the cortical body matrix: implications for sports medicine and future directions.

Sarah B Wallwork1, Valeria Bellan1, Mark J Catley1, G Lorimer Moseley2.   

Abstract

Neural representations, or neurotags, refer to the idea that networks of brain cells, distributed across multiple brain areas, work in synergy to produce outputs. The brain can be considered then, a complex array of neurotags, each influencing and being influenced by each other. The output of some neurotags act on other systems, for example, movement, or on consciousness, for example, pain. This concept of neurotags has sparked a new body of research into pain and rehabilitation. We draw on this research and the concept of a cortical body matrix-a network of representations that subserves the regulation and protection of the body and the space around it-to suggest important implications for rehabilitation of sports injury and for sports performance. Protective behaviours associated with pain have been reinterpreted in light of these conceptual models. With a particular focus on rehabilitation of the injured athlete, this review presents the theoretical underpinnings of the cortical body matrix and its application within the sporting context. Therapeutic approaches based on these ideas are discussed and the efficacy of the most tested approaches is addressed. By integrating current thought in pain and cognitive neuroscience related to sports rehabilitation, recommendations for clinical practice and future research are suggested. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Exercise rehabilitation; Rehabilitation; Sporting injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682866     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  8 in total

1.  Virtual Reality for Research in Social Neuroscience.

Authors:  Thomas D Parsons; Andrea Gaggioli; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-04-16

2.  Embodied Medicine: Mens Sana in Corpore Virtuale Sano.

Authors:  Giuseppe Riva; Silvia Serino; Daniele Di Lernia; Enea Francesco Pavone; Antonios Dakanalis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Using visuo-kinetic virtual reality to induce illusory spinal movement: the MoOVi Illusion.

Authors:  Daniel S Harvie; Ross T Smith; Estin V Hunter; Miles G Davis; Michele Sterling; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Talking to Teens about Pain: A Modified Delphi Study of Adolescent Pain Science Education.

Authors:  Hayley B Leake; Lauren C Heathcote; Laura E Simons; Jennifer Stinson; Steven J Kamper; Christopher M Williams; Laura L Burgoyne; Meredith Craigie; Marjolein Kammers; David Moen; Joshua W Pate; Kimberley Szeto; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  Can a Single Trial of a Thoracolumbar Myofascial Release Technique Reduce Pain and Disability in Chronic Low Back Pain? A Randomized Balanced Crossover Study.

Authors:  Luana Rocha Paulo; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Lacerda; Fábio Luiz Mendonça Martins; José Sebastião Cunha Fernandes; Leonardo Sette Vieira; Cristiano Queiroz Guimarães; Sílvia de Simoni Guedes Ballesteros; Marco Túlio Saldanha Dos Anjos; Patrícia Aparecida Tavares; Sueli Ferreira da Fonseca; Murilo Xavier Oliveira; Mário Bernardo-Filho; Danúbia da Cunha de Sá-Caputo; Vanessa Amaral Mendonça; Redha Taiar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Commentary: Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain.

Authors:  Thorvaldur S Palsson; J P Caneiro; Rogerio Pessoto Hirata; Derek Griffin; William Gibson; Mervyn J Travers
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The disappearing hand: vestibular stimulation does not improve hand localisation.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; Valeria Bellan; Mohammad Shohag; Danny Camfferman; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Implicit motor imagery performance is impaired in people with chronic, but not acute, neck pain.

Authors:  Sarah B Wallwork; Hayley B Leake; Aimie L Peek; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.