Literature DB >> 26682847

Comparison of 1-Day Emergency Department Observation and Inpatient Ward for 1-Day Admissions in Syncope Patients.

Atira M Grossman1, Katherine A Volz1, Nathan I Shapiro1, Roee Salem1, Leon D Sanchez1, Peter Smulowitz1, Shamai A Grossman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an era of increasing health care costs, the need for hospitalization is being scrutinized. In particular, 1-day hospitalizations are thought to be especially costly and unnecessary, and, increasingly, emergency department observation units (EDOUs) are being used as alternatives.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the differences in outcomes and diagnoses between 1-day inpatient and EDOU stays for syncope.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with syncope who were seen in an urban ED with 1-day admission to an inpatient ward, EDOU, or full hospitalization. Etiology of syncope was classified as benign (vasovagal, dehydration), serious (dysrhythmia, sepsis, stroke/intracranial bleed, hemorrhage, valvular, ischemia, pulmonary embolism), or unknown. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and t-test.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two of 351 patients were >1-day admissions, 152 (85%) were admitted for 1 day, and 27 (15%) were admitted to EDOU. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age when admitted to the hospital was significantly higher at 72 (18.4) years for > 1-day admissions and 68.8 (19.6) years for 1-day admissions vs. 53.0 (18.9) years for EDOU patients (p < 0.01). For fully admitted patients, 36% had benign etiologies of syncope and 38% had serious causes of syncope; in 1-day admitted patients, 48% had benign etiologies and 14% had serious causes. Among EDOU patients, 44% had benign etiologies and none were serious. One-day patients were more likely to have unknown causes of syncope at discharge (36%; 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.43) when compared with admitted patients (26%; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.33); similarly, observation patients were more likely to be discharged without a diagnosis (56%; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.74; p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: EDOU patients were less likely than patients admitted to the hospital to be discharged with an etiology of their syncope. Future EDOU protocols can benefit from set admission criteria and standardized evaluation protocols to facilitate maximal use of EDOU for syncope.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  admission; day; observation; one; syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682847     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  2 in total

Review 1.  Role of emergency department observation units in the management of patients with unexplained syncope: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Numeroso; Gianluigi Mossini; Giuseppe Lippi; Gianfranco Cervellin
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30

2.  Using the Boston Syncope Observation Management Pathway to Reduce Hospital Admission and Adverse Outcomes.

Authors:  Oren J Mechanic; Celine Y Pascheles; Gregory J Lopez; Alina M Winans; Nathan I Shapiro; Carrie Tibbles; Richard E Wolfe; Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.