| Literature DB >> 26682750 |
Renata B S Lima1,2,3, Luiz F Rocha e Silva4,5,6, Marcia R S Melo7, Jaqueline S Costa8, Neila S Picanço9,10, Emerson S Lima11, Marne C Vasconcellos12, Ana Paula A Boleti13, Jakeline M P Santos14, Rodrigo C N Amorim15, Francisco C M Chaves16, Julia P Coutinho17, Wanderli P Tadei18, Antoniana U Krettli19, Adrian M Pohlit20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The anti-malarials quinine and artemisinin were isolated from traditionally used plants (Cinchona spp. and Artemisia annua, respectively). The synthetic quinoline anti-malarials (e.g. chloroquine) and semi-synthetic artemisinin derivatives (e.g. artesunate) were developed based on these natural products. Malaria is endemic to the Amazon region where Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax drug-resistance is of concern. There is an urgent need for new anti-malarials. Traditionally used Amazonian plants may provide new treatments for drug-resistant P. vivax and P. falciparum. Herein, the in vitro and in vivo antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of medicinal plant extracts were investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26682750 PMCID: PMC4683771 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0999-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Information on plant species, voucher specimens, traditional remedies and ethnobotanic sources indicating anti-malarial use
| Species | Family | Accession number | Common name | Remedy | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Anacardiaceae | INPA 57941 | Cajueiro | Bark, leaves, fruit infusions, decoction (10 drops 2×/day of trunk bark alcohol extract) | [ |
|
| Poaceae | INPA 250467 | Capim-colchão | Whole plant decoction | [ |
|
| Melastomataceae | INPA 250466 | Caiuia | Not founda | Not founda |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | EAFM 315 | Sacaca | Bark and leaves infusions | [ |
|
| Fabaceae | INPA 15562 | Timbó | Branches | [ |
|
| Melastomataceae | INPA 250467 | Miraúba | Decoction (part not specified) | [ |
|
| Fabaceae | INPA 152124 | Faveira | Not specified | [ |
|
| Sapindaceae | INPA 122001 | Guaraná | Leaves, branches, roots, seeds | [ |
|
| Malpighiaceae | INPA 205629 | Cipó asa de gafanhoto | Leaves decoction | [ |
|
| Annonaceae | INPA 183108 | Envira sarassará | Not foundb | Not foundb |
|
| Rutaceae | INPA 210077 | Tamanqueira | Not foundc | Not foundc |
a Clidemia hirta is the species cited as being in use by traditional peoples of the Peruvian Amazon [38]
bFruit and trunk bark macerates and infusions of these Xylopia spp. are used as anti-malarials: Xylopia aethiopica, Xylopia aromatica, Xylopia brasiliensis, Xylopia emarginata, Xylopia frutescens, Xylopia grandiflora, Xylopia hypolampra, Xylopia longifolia, Xylopia parviflora, Xylopia phloiodora, Xylopia staudtii, Xylopia xylopioides [30, 58, 80–85, 125, 126]
cThese Zanthoxylum spp. are used as anti-malarials: Zanthoxylum armatum, Zanthoxylum caribaem, Zanthoxylum chalybeum, Zanthoxylum chiloperone, Zanthoxylum gilletii, Zanthoxylum hermaphroditum, Zanthoxylum leprieurii, Zanthoxylum pentandrum, Zanthoxylum perrottetti, Zanthoxylum rhoifolium, Zanthoxylum rubescens, Zanthoxylum tingoassuiba, Zanthoxylum tsihanimposa, Zanthoxylum usambarense, Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides. Leaf, fruit, trunk bark and root bark decoctions are used [33, 58, 59, 84, 85, 100–105, 107–110, 127–129]
In vitro median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) against Plasmodium falciparum strains, toxicity to murine macrophages (IC50) and selectivity indices (SI) of plant extracts
| Plant species | Part | Extract |
| Macrophages | SIc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | 36.6 ± 17.7 | I | >200 | >5.5 |
| EtOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 43.9 ± 10.8 | I | >200 | >4.6 | |
| EtOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| H2O(i) | 45.0 ± 5.0 | I | >200 | >4.4 | ||
|
| Aerial part | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| H2O(d) | 45.4 ± 0.4 | I | >200 | >4.4 | ||
| MeOH | 7.1 ± 3.3 | A | >200 | >28.2 | ||
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| H2O(d) | 26.2 ± 3.1 | I | >200 | >7.6 | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Branch | CHCl3 | 13.5 ± 2.7 | MA | >200 | >14.8 | |
| H2O(d) | 21.2 ± 4.0 | MA | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | 29.1 ± 6.3 | I | 43.1 (27.4–67.8) | 1.5 |
| EtOH | 17.2 ± 6.6 | MA | 127 (49.8–321) | 7.4 | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 11.3 ± 3.4 | MA | >200 | >17.7 | |
| EtOH | 16.3 ± 4.5 | MA | >200 | >12.3 | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | 32.2 ± 5.7 | I | >200 | >6.2 |
| EtOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 6.4 ± 1.2 | A | 40.6 (32.6–50.6) | 6.3 | |
| EtOH | 13.3 ± 2.3 | MA | >200 | >15.0 | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 47.4 ± 1.6 | I | >200 | >4.2 | |
| H2O(i) | 27.5 ± 7.5 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | 13.3 ± 2.0 | MA | 46.6 (43.1–50.4) | 3.5 |
| H2O(d) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 12.4 ± 4.1 | MA | 70.6 (62.7–79.7) | 5.7 | |
| H2O(d) | 10.2 ± 2.5 | MA | >200 | >19.6 | ||
| MeOH | 9.9 ± 3.2 | A | 95.9 (71.0–130) | 9.7 | ||
|
| Bark | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| H2O(d) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Leaf | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – | |
| H2O(d) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Fruit | CHCl3 | 19.3 ± 6.4 | MA | >200 | >10.4 | |
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Branch | CHCl3 | 19.3 ± 5.5 | MA | 62.9 (53.9–73.4) | 3.3 | |
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | >50 | I | – | – |
| EtOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| H2O(i) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 7.3 ± 1.8 | A | 33.9 (29.6–38.9) | 4.6 |
| H2O(d) | 10.5 ± 3.3 | MA | >200 | >19.0 | ||
| EtOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Branch | CHCl3 | 19.5 ± 3.1 | MA | 29.2 (19.6–43.5) | 1.5 | |
| H2O(d) | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| EtOH | 9.8 ± 1.8 | A | 6.9 (0.4–12.1) | 0.7 | ||
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 40.2 ± 3.2 | I | >200 | >5.0 |
| H2O(i) | 15.6 ± 2.9 | MA | >200 | >12.8 | ||
| MeOH | >50 | I | – | – | ||
| Branch | CHCl3 | 17.4 ± 1.3 | MA | 24.7 (18.6–32.9) | 1.4 | |
| H2O(i) | 32.5 ± 7.9 | I | >200 | >6.2 | ||
| MeOH | 21.8 ± 3.7 | I | >200 | >9.2 | ||
| Controls | DMSO | – | I | – | – | |
| Chloroquine diphosphate | 0.23 ± 0.03 | A | – | – | ||
| Doxorubicin | – | – | 0.63 (0.59–0.68) | – | ||
EtOH ethanol, MeOH methanol, H O(i) infusion, H O(d) decoction, SD standard deviation, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, – not evaluated, not determined
aAll extracts were screened at 50 and 5 mg/mL against P. falciparum K1 strain using optical microscopy in three separate experiments. Accurate IC50 values were determined using seven concentrations of extract against P. falciparum W2 strain using the HRP2-ELISA method
bAntiplasmodial effect based on IC50: A active (IC50 ≤ 10 µg/mL), MA moderately active (10 < IC50 ≤ 25 μg/mL) and I inactive (IC50 > 25 μg/mL)
cSI = IC50(murine macrophages)/IC50(
Parasitemia suppression versus untreated controls and survival in mice infected with Plasmodium berghei after oral administration of plant extracts for four days
| Plant | Part | Extract | Dose (mg/kg/day) | % parasite ± SD (% suppression) | Avg. survival ± SD (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 5 | Day 7 | |||||
|
| Aerial part | MeOH | 250 | 0.49 ± 0.10 (71) | 1.12 ± 0.07 (48) | 19 ± 2 |
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 250 | 1.4 ± 0.27 (19) | 2.2 ± 0.15 (0) | 23 ± 3 |
|
| Leaf | CHCl3 | 250 | 0.82 ± 0.22 (52) | 1.87 ± 0.26 (11) | 20 ± 2 |
| Controls | Chloroquine diphosphate | 10 | 0.15 ± 0.04 (91) | 0.14 ± 0.04 (93) | 31 ± 4 | |
| Vehicle (Blank) | 1.74 ± 0.21 | 2.12 ± 0.31 | 22 ± 1 | |||
CHCl chloroform, MeOH methanol, SD standard deviation