Literature DB >> 26682541

Specific Features of Dumping Syndrome after Various Types of Gastrectomy as Assessed by a Newly Developed Integrated Questionnaire, the PGSAS-45.

Yutaka Tanizawa1, Kazuaki Tanabe, Hiroshi Kawahira, Junya Fujita, Nobuhiro Takiguchi, Masazumi Takahashi, Yuichi Ito, Norio Mitsumori, Tsutomu Namikawa, Atsushi Oshio, Koji Nakada.   

Abstract

AIM: Dumping syndrome is a well-known adverse outcome after gastrectomy, but the precise clinical features have not been described. The aim of this study was to examine global aspects of dumping syndrome and to explore factors affecting the intensity of dumping syndrome in a large cohort using a newly developed integrated questionnaire, the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45.
METHODS: Eligible questionnaires retrieved from 2,368 patients after 6 types of gastrectomy were analyzed. The incidence, intensity and number of symptoms of early general, early abdominal and late dumping syndrome were examined across various types of gastrectomy, and clinical factors affecting the intensity of each category of dumping syndrome were identified by multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: Dumping syndromes occurred most frequently and strongly in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (TGRY), followed by proximal gastrectomy (PG), distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I, distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y, pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and local resection (LR), in that order. Significant positive correlations among different categories of dumping syndromes were observed. TGRY, female sex, younger age, division of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve, PG and shorter postoperative period were independently related to worse dumping syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: Dumping syndromes were most common after TGRY and least common after PPG and LR among the various gastrectomy procedures. Type of gastrectomy and several clinical factors were related to the intensity of dumping syndrome. PGSAS-45 could offer a useful tool for evaluating dumping syndrome after gastrectomy.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682541     DOI: 10.1159/000442217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Reconstruction following gastrectomy].

Authors:  Marie-Christin Weber; Maximilian Berlet; Alexander Novotny; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Reconstruction and functional results after gastric resection].

Authors:  W Schröder; H Fuchs; J Straatman; B Babic
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-29

3.  Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives of small remnant distal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer using a large-scale questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Masazumi Takahashi; Shinichi Kinami; Junya Fujita; Takahisa Suzuki; Akihiro Suzuki; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Yoshihiko Kawaguchi; Atsushi Oshio; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Assessing optimal Roux-en-Y reconstruction technique after total gastrectomy using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45.

Authors:  Masami Ikeda; Masashi Yoshida; Norio Mitsumori; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Chikashi Shibata; Masanori Terashima; Junya Fujita; Kazuaki Tanabe; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Atsushi Oshio; Koji Nakada
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-24

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal Motility Issues in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mehnaz A Shafi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Factors affecting the quality of life of patients after gastrectomy as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale: A nationwide multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Koji Nakada; Masazumi Takahashi; Masami Ikeda; Shinichi Kinami; Masashi Yoshida; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Sayumi Nakao; Atsushi Oshio; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Masanori Terashima; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer: Is it time to tailor it?

Authors:  Paolo Aurello; Niccolò Petrucciani; Laura Antolino; Diego Giulitti; Francesco D'Angelo; Giovanni Ramacciato
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Postprandial Asymptomatic Glycemic Fluctuations after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device.

Authors:  Motonari Ri; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Ida; Naoki Ishizuka; Shinichiro Atsumi; Masaru Hayami; Rie Makuuchi; Koshi Kumagai; Manabu Ohashi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.720

9.  Herbal Medicine for Dumping Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seungcheol Hong; Bongki Park; Hyeonseok Noh; Dong-Jun Choi
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Defecation disorders are crucial sequelae that impairs the quality of life of patients after conventional gastrectomy.

Authors:  Koji Nakada; Masami Ikeda; Masazumi Takahashi; Shinichi Kinami; Masashi Yoshida; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Masanori Terashima; Atsushi Oshio; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-11-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.