Literature DB >> 2668247

A multicentric study of netilmicin once daily versus thrice daily in patients with appendicitis and other intra-abdominal infections.

L F Hollender1, J Bahnini, N De Manzini, W Y Lau, S T Fan, K Hermansyur, P Benny, A N Husni, R R Lorber.   

Abstract

This multicentric, randomized, double-blind trial compared the efficacy and safety of netilmicin, 4.5 mg/kg od and 1.5 mg/kg tid, in patients with intra-abdominal infections. Of 114 patients enrolled, 57 patients (mean age 40.3 years) in the od group and 55 (mean age 36.8 years) in the tid group were evaluated for efficacy; 58 and 56 patients in corresponding groups were evaluated for safety. Among those evaluated for efficacy were 12 od-treated and 11 tid-treated patients with documented septicaemia, and 32 and 30 patients of respective groups with polymicrobial infections. Initially, 86 and 81 netilmicin-susceptible causative microorganisms were isolated in corresponding groups. Of these pathogens, 55% in the od group and 62% in the tid group were Escherichia coli. Daily dosage of netilmicin ranged from 3.70 to 4.71 mg/kg (mean 4.50) for the od group and from 3.06 to 4.76 mg/kg (mean 4.46) for the tid group. Duration of netilmicin therapy ranged from six to 13 days (mean 8.7 days) for od-treated patients and from seven to 16 days (mean 8.8 days) for tid-treated patients. Concomitant metronidazole was administered to 41 patients of the od group and 34 of the tid group; one patient in the tid group received clindamycin. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed, and peak and trough serum netilmicin levels were measured periodically, during therapy. Laboratory tests, including determinations of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values, were performed throughout the trial. A clinical cure was achieved in 57/57 od-treated patients and 54/55 tid-treated patients; treatment failed in one tid-treated patient (1/55). In od and tid groups, 86/86 and 80/81 netilmicin-susceptible pathogens initially isolated were considered to be eliminated, respectively; one isolate (Esch. coli) persisted in the tid group. Mean peak serum netilmicin concentration in the od group was approximately two-fold greater than that in the tid group; mean trough serum netilmicin concentrations were similar for the two groups. Adverse reactions were limited to mild pain at the site of netilmicin administration in several patients in each treatment group. Netilmicin od and tid (alone or in combination with metronidazole) were similarly efficacious in the treatment of patients with appendicitis and other intra-abdominal infections caused by netilmicin-susceptible pathogens. Both dosage regimens of netilmicin were safe and well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668247     DOI: 10.1093/jac/23.5.773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  19 in total

1.  Aminoglycoside therapy: current and prospective uses.

Authors:  J E Leggett
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Once-daily aminoglycoside therapy.

Authors:  D N Gilbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides.

Authors:  J Blaser; C König
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Once-daily aminoglycoside therapy: potential ototoxicity.

Authors:  C Singer; C Smith; D Krieff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Aminoglycoside therapy. Current use and future prospects.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-06-22

6.  In vivo antibacterial effects of simulated human serum profiles of once-daily versus thrice-daily dosing of amikacin in a Serratia marcescens endocarditis experimental model.

Authors:  D Bugnon; G Potel; Y Q Xiong; J Caillon; M F Kergueris; P Le Conte; D Baron; H Drugeon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Use of aminoglycosides in elderly patients. Pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations.

Authors:  K Mörike; M Schwab; U Klotz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.

Authors:  M J Rybak; B J Abate; S L Kang; M J Ruffing; S A Lerner; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Once-daily aminoglycoside administration in gram-negative sepsis. Economic and practical aspects.

Authors:  S E Parker; P G Davey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Easier monitoring of aminoglycoside therapy with once-daily dosing schedules.

Authors:  J M Prins; R P Koopmans; H R Büller; E J Kuijper; P Speelman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.