Literature DB >> 2668227

Safety and effectiveness of cranial electrotherapy in the treatment of tension headache.

S Solomon, A Elkind, F Freitag, R M Gallagher, K Moore, B Swerdlow, S Malkin.   

Abstract

One hundred patients were enrolled in a multicenter double-blind study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Pain Suppressor Unit, a cranial electrotherapy stimulator for the symptomatic treatment of tension headaches. Treatment consisted of extremely low level, high frequency current applied transcranially. Pain scores before and after 20 minute treatments of individual headaches as well as patient and physician global evaluations were the primary efficacy variables. Following use of the active unit, patients reported an average reduction in pain intensity of approximately 35%. Placebo patients reported a reduction of approximately 18%. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The active unit was rated as moderately or highly effective in 40% by physicians, and in 36% by patients. Both physicians and patients scored the placebo unit moderately or highly effective for only 16%. The difference in ordered outcomes was statistically significant (p = 0.004). Approximately 10% of patients in each group reported at least one minor adverse experience. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation is distinct from TENS, and is safe and often effective in ameliorating the pain intensity of tension headaches. It should be considered as an alternative to the chronic usage of analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668227     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed2907445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  7 in total

1.  A study of the effects of cranial electrical stimulation on attention and concentration.

Authors:  S Southworth
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar

2.  Pulsed radio frequency therapy of experimentally induced arthritis in ponies.

Authors:  W H Crawford; J C Houge; D T Neirby; A Di Mino; A A Di Mino
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Physiological and therapeutic effects of high frequency electrical pulses.

Authors:  S Liss; B Liss
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1996 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

6.  Feasibility of using cranial electrotherapy stimulation for pain in persons with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Diana H Rintala; Gabriel Tan; Pamela Willson; Mon S Bryant; Eugene C H Lai
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2010-05-05

7.  Quantitative Electroencephalography Analysis (qEEG) of Neuro-Electro-Adaptive Therapy 12™ [NEAT12] Up-Regulates Cortical Potentials in an Alcoholic during Protracted Abstinence: Putative Anti-Craving Implications.

Authors:  Roger L Waite; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Eric RBraverman; Debmalya Barh; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2014
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.