Andrew J Farmer1,2, Lauren R Rodgers3, Mike Lonergan4, Beverley Shields5, Michael N Weedon6, Louise Donnelly4, Rury R Holman2, Ewan R Pearson4, Andrew T Hattersley7. 1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2. Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. 3. Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. 4. Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 5. NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. 6. Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. 7. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The impact of taking oral glucose-lowering medicines intermittently, rather than as recommended, is unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using community-acquired U.K. clinical data (Clinical Practice Research Database [CPRD] and GoDARTS database) to examine the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment for type 2 diabetes and investigate its potential impact on HbA1c reduction stratified by type of glucose-lowering medication. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were extracted for patients treated between 2004 and 2014 who were newly prescribed metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and who continued to obtain prescriptions over 1 year. Cohorts were defined by prescribed medication type, and good adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio ≥0.8. Linear regression was used to determine potential associations between adherence and 1-year baseline-adjusted HbA1c reduction. RESULTS: In CPRD and GoDARTS, 13% and 15% of patients, respectively, were nonadherent. Proportions of nonadherent patients varied by the oral glucose-lowering treatment prescribed (range 8.6% [thiazolidinedione] to 18.8% [metformin]). Nonadherent, compared with adherent, patients had a smaller HbA1c reduction (0.4% [4.4 mmol/mol] and 0.46% [5.0 mmol/mol] for CPRD and GoDARTs, respectively). Difference in HbA1c response for adherent compared with nonadherent patients varied by drug (range 0.38% [4.1 mmol/mol] to 0.75% [8.2 mmol/mol] lower in adherent group). Decreasing levels of adherence were consistently associated with a smaller reduction in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced medication adherence for commonly used glucose-lowering therapies among patients persisting with treatment is associated with smaller HbA1c reductions compared with those taking treatment as recommended. Differences observed in HbA1c responses to glucose-lowering treatments may be explained in part by their intermittent use.
OBJECTIVE: The impact of taking oral glucose-lowering medicines intermittently, rather than as recommended, is unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using community-acquired U.K. clinical data (Clinical Practice Research Database [CPRD] and GoDARTS database) to examine the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment for type 2 diabetes and investigate its potential impact on HbA1c reduction stratified by type of glucose-lowering medication. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were extracted for patients treated between 2004 and 2014 who were newly prescribed metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and who continued to obtain prescriptions over 1 year. Cohorts were defined by prescribed medication type, and good adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio ≥0.8. Linear regression was used to determine potential associations between adherence and 1-year baseline-adjusted HbA1c reduction. RESULTS: In CPRD and GoDARTS, 13% and 15% of patients, respectively, were nonadherent. Proportions of nonadherent patients varied by the oral glucose-lowering treatment prescribed (range 8.6% [thiazolidinedione] to 18.8% [metformin]). Nonadherent, compared with adherent, patients had a smaller HbA1c reduction (0.4% [4.4 mmol/mol] and 0.46% [5.0 mmol/mol] for CPRD and GoDARTs, respectively). Difference in HbA1c response for adherent compared with nonadherent patients varied by drug (range 0.38% [4.1 mmol/mol] to 0.75% [8.2 mmol/mol] lower in adherent group). Decreasing levels of adherence were consistently associated with a smaller reduction in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced medication adherence for commonly used glucose-lowering therapies among patients persisting with treatment is associated with smaller HbA1c reductions compared with those taking treatment as recommended. Differences observed in HbA1c responses to glucose-lowering treatments may be explained in part by their intermittent use.
Authors: Manel Pladevall; L Keoki Williams; Lisa Ann Potts; George Divine; Hugo Xi; Jennifer Elston Lafata Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Scot H Simpson; Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Janice Varney; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-06-21
Authors: Elizabeth H B Lin; Michael Von Korff; Paul Ciechanowski; Do Peterson; Evette J Ludman; Carolyn M Rutter; Malia Oliver; Bessie A Young; Jochen Gensichen; Mary McGregor; David K McCulloch; Edward H Wagner; Wayne J Katon Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Chris L Bryson; David H Au; Matthew L Maciejewski; John D Piette; Stephan D Fihn; George L Jackson; Mark Perkins; Edwin S Wong; Elizabeth M Yano; Chuan-Fen Liu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sudeep Karve; Mario A Cleves; Mark Helm; Teresa J Hudson; Donna S West; Bradley C Martin Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Connie S Uratsu; Andrew J Karter; Michele Heisler; Usha Subramanian; Carol M Mangione; Joe V Selby Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John M Dennis; William E Henley; Michael N Weedon; Mike Lonergan; Lauren R Rodgers; Angus G Jones; William T Hamilton; Naveed Sattar; Salim Janmohamed; Rury R Holman; Ewan R Pearson; Beverley M Shields; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 19.112