Literature DB >> 26681681

Adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer: consensus guidance for clinical practice from a European Panel.

P Hadji1, R E Coleman2, C Wilson3, T J Powles4, P Clézardin5, M Aapro6, L Costa7, J-J Body8, C Markopoulos9, D Santini10, I Diel11, A Di Leo12, D Cameron13, D Dodwell14, I Smith15, M Gnant16, R Gray17, N Harbeck18, B Thurlimann19, M Untch20, J Cortes21, M Martin22, U-S Albert1, P-F Conte23, B Ejlertsen24, J Bergh25, M Kaufmann26, I Holen3.   

Abstract

Bisphosphonates have been studied in randomised trials in early breast cancer to investigate their ability to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and reduce the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis. Treatment benefits have been reported but bisphosphonates do not currently have regulatory approval for either of these potential indications. This consensus paper provides a review of the evidence and offers guidance to breast cancer clinicians on the use of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer. Using the nominal group methodology for consensus, a systematic review of the literature was augmented by a workshop held in October 2014 for breast cancer and bone specialists to present and debate the available pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. This was followed by a questionnaire to all members of the writing committee to identify areas of consensus. The panel recommended that bisphosphonates should be considered as part of routine clinical practice for the prevention of CTIBL in all patients with a T score of <-2.0 or ≥2 clinical risk factors for fracture. Compelling evidence from a meta-analysis of trial data of >18,000 patients supports clinically significant benefits of bisphosphonates on the development of bone metastases and breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women or those receiving ovarian suppression therapy. Therefore, the panel recommends that bisphosphonates (either intravenous zoledronic acid or oral clodronate) are considered as part of the adjuvant breast cancer treatment in this population and the potential benefits and risks discussed with relevant patients.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant; bisphosphonates; breast cancer; guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26681681     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  43 in total

Review 1.  Scientific advice - is drug repurposing missing a trick?

Authors:  Pan Pantziarka
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Bisphosphonate-Generated ATP-Analogs Inhibit Cell Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Satish R Malwal; Bing O'Dowd; Xinxin Feng; Petri Turhanen; Christopher Shin; Jiaqi Yao; Boo Kyung Kim; Noman Baig; Tianhui Zhou; Sandhya Bansal; Rahul L Khade; Yong Zhang; Eric Oldfield
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Management of Potential Long-Term Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C O'Sullivan; K J Ruddy
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Phase III Randomized Trial of Bisphosphonates as Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: S0307.

Authors:  Julie R Gralow; William E Barlow; Alexander H G Paterson; Jieling L M'iao; Danika L Lew; Alison T Stopeck; Daniel F Hayes; Dawn L Hershman; Mark M Schubert; Mark Clemons; Catherine H Van Poznak; Elizabeth C Dees; James N Ingle; Carla I Falkson; Anthony D Elias; Michael J Messino; Jeffrey H Margolis; Shaker R Dakhil; Helen K Chew; Kim Z Dammann; Jeffrey S Abrams; Robert B Livingston; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Heparan sulfate proteoglycans as targets for cancer therapy: a review.

Authors:  Jessica Oyie Sousa Onyeisi; Bianca Zaia Franco Ferreira; Helena Bonciani Nader; Carla Cristina Lopes
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Osteoporosis in colorectal cancer survivors: analysis of the linkage between SWOG trial enrollees and Medicare claims.

Authors:  Afsaneh Barzi; Dawn L Hershman; Cathee Till; William E Barlow; Scott Ramsey; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Howard S Hochster; Joseph M Unger
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Evaluation and management of skeletal disease in cancer care.

Authors:  Anuhya Kommalapati; Sri Harsha Tella; Mary Angelynne Esquivel; Ricardo Correa
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 8.  St. Gallen/Vienna 2017: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion about Escalation and De-Escalation of Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Michael Gnant; Nadia Harbeck; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Clinical and translational pharmacology of drugs for the prevention and treatment of bone metastases and cancer-induced bone loss.

Authors:  Maria Rita Dionísio; André Mansinho; Catarina Abreu; Joana Cavaco-Silva; Sandra Casimiro; Luís Costa
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Lambertini; Lucia Del Mastro; Giulia Viglietti; Noam F Pondé; Cinzia Solinas; Evandro de Azambuja
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.