Literature DB >> 26681314

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a revised position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

.   

Abstract

DISCLAIMER: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health-care providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services. Adherence to these recommendations does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, geneticists and other clinicians should apply their own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the patient's record the rationale for any significant deviation from the recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26681314     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  19 in total

1.  Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk.

Authors:  K M Broady; K E Ormond; E J Topol; N J Schork; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-13

2.  Transparency of genetic testing services for 'health, wellness and lifestyle': analysis of online prepurchase information for UK consumers.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Hall; Rena Gertz; Joan Amato; Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Lauren Badalato; Louiza Kalokairinou; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Ethical issues in neurogenetics.

Authors:  Wendy R Uhlmann; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

5.  How Can Law and Policy Advance Quality in Genomic Analysis and Interpretation for Clinical Care?

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Gail Javitt; Ralph Hall; Megan Robertson; Pilar Ossorio; Susan M Wolf; Thomas Morgan; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 7.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Perspectives on Genetic Testing and Return of Results from the First Cohort of Presymptomatically Tested Individuals At Risk of Huntington Disease.

Authors:  K M Stuttgen; J M Bollinger; R L Dvoskin; A McCague; B Shpritz; J Brandt; Debra J H Mathews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Evaluation of a Web-based decision aid for people considering the APOE genetic test for Alzheimer risk.

Authors:  Michael Ekstract; Golde I Holtzman; Kye Y Kim; Susan M Willis; Doris T Zallen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.