| Literature DB >> 26681295 |
J Mushanyu1, F Nyabadza2, A G R Stewart3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dependence on methamphetamine remains one of the major health and social problem in the Western Cape province of South Africa. We consider a mathematical model that takes into account two forms of rehabilitation, namely; inpatient and outpatient. We examine the trends of these two types of rehabilitation. We also seek to investigate the global dynamics of the developed methamphetamine epidemic model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26681295 PMCID: PMC4683750 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1741-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Model flow diagram. Schematic diagram showing the movement of humans as their status with respect to drug use changes
Fig. 2Model system Eqs. (2)–(5) fitted to data for individuals under inpatient rehabilitation in Cape Town. The blue circles indicate the actual data and the solid red line indicates the model fit to the data. The percentages are not of all users, but of those in rehabilitation. From the second half (July–December) of the year 2008 back to the first half (January–June) of the year 2000, more than half of the patients admitted in the treatment centers of Cape Town were treated on an inpatient basis. It shows a decline in the proportion of drug users treated under inpatient rehabilitation programs in Cape Town, see also Fig. 6. This decline, might be a result of retarding economic situation or expensive costs associated with inpatient rehabilitation centers. Also, due to the fact that inpatient rehabilitation programs are formally 24 h programs, some people would prefer outpatient rehabilitation programs to allow them to work for their families whilst receiving treatment. It demonstrates a good fit to the data from Table 1
Fig. 6Estimation of the proportions of inpatient rehabilitants relative to outpatient rehabilitants in Cape Town projected over 5 more years. It demonstrates the changes of the ratio of inpatient rehabilitants to outpatient rehabilitants over the modelling time and projects these changes over a period of 5 years. The graph shows a steady decrease in the proportion inpatient rehabilitants coupled with an increase in the proportion of outpatient rehabilitants. The reason for the decrease is similar to the one used to for Figs. 2 and 3
Treatment type received for the period 1999a to 2013a (%)
| Year | 1999a | 1999b | 2000a | 2000b | 2001a | 2001b | 2002a | 2002b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient (%) | 69 | 66 | 66 | 68 | 66 | 65 | 58 | 62 |
| Outpatient (%) | 27 | 32 | 34 | 32 | 34 | 35 | 42 | 38 |
Letter ‘a’ represents the first 6 months of the year and ‘b’ represents the last 6 months of the year
Fig. 3Estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse using data for inpatient rehabilitants in Cape Town. Our estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse, evaluated using the initiation function , is observed to be generally decreasing over the modeling period
Fig. 4Model system Eqs. (2)–(5) fitted to data for individuals under outpatient rehabilitation in Cape Town. The blue circles indicate the actual data and the solid red line indicates the model fit to the data. The percentages are not of all users, but of those in rehabilitation. Starting from the second half (July–December) of the year 2008 up to the first half (January–June) of the year 2013, the majority of patients in specialist treatment centres of Cape Town were now being treated on an outpatient basis. It shows a good fit to the data from Table 1
Fig. 5Estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse using data for outpatient rehabilitants in Cape Town. Our estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse, evaluated using the initiation function , is observed to be decreasing sharply from the first half of the year 2000 down until the second half of the year 2002. It then suddenly increases from about 9 % in the year 2003 reaching an estimated incidence of 13 % in the second half of 2008, after which it steadily decreases until the first half of the year 2013
Fig. 7Model system Eqs. (2)–(5) fitted to data for individuals under inpatient rehabilitation in Cape Town and projected for 5 more years. The blue circles indicate the actual data and the solid red line indicates the model fit to the data. The percentages are not of all users, but of those in rehabilitation. The proportion of patients admitted under inpatient rehabilitation facilities in Cape Town is expected to be decreasing for the next five years, see also Fig. 6. This projected decrease in the proportion of inpatient rehabilitants can be an attribute of higher costs usually associated with inpatient rehabilitation programs and as a result, few individuals will afford receiving treatment at those facilities. As can be seen from the incidence curves related to data on inpatient rehabilitants, that inpatient rehabilitation programs have an increased potential of reducing methamphetamine incidence, there are fears that this decrease in the proportion of inpatient rehabilitants will to a greater extend result to higher prevalence rates of use observed for a long period of time
Fig. 8Estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse using data for inpatient rehabilitants in Cape Town and projected for 5 more years. We also note the decreasing trend for incidence of methamphetamine abuse. Our estimated incidence will have decreased to below by the year 2018
Fig. 9Model system Eqs. (2)–(5) fitted to data for individuals under outpatient rehabilitation in Cape Town and projected for five more years. The blue circles indicate the actual data and the solid red line indicates the model fit to the data. The proportion of patients admitted under outpatient rehabilitation facilities in Cape Town is likely to continue increasing for the next five years, see also Fig. 6. The percentages are not of all users, but of those in rehabilitation
Fig. 10Estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse using data for outpatient rehabilitants in Cape Town and projected for five more years. The estimated incidence of methamphetamine abuse is expected to gradually decrease for the next five years down to below by the year 2018
Parameter values and ranges obtained from data fitting
| Description | Range | Value | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| The effective contact rate between users and susceptibles | 0.10–0.21 |
| [ |
|
| The relative ability for outpatients to initiate new users | 0–0.0099 |
| Estimated |
|
| Proportion of users recruited into inpatient rehab | 0–1 |
| Estimated |
|
| The effectiveness of rehab | 0–1 |
| Estimated |
|
| The rate at which users are recruited into rehab | 0–0.05024 |
| Estimated |
|
| The rate of quitting abuse for outpatients | 0.001–1 |
| Estimated |
|
| The rate of quitting abuse for inpatients | 0.01–1 |
| Estimated |
|
| Relapse rate for outpatients | 0–0.054 |
| Estimated |
|
| Relapse rate for inpatients | 0–0.0235 |
| Estimated |
|
| Transfer rate from outpatient rehab to inpatient rehab | 0–0.06012 |
| Estimated |
|
| Transfer rate from inpatient rehab to outpatient rehab | 0–0.008 |
| Estimated |
|
| Recruitment rate into the susceptible population | 0.028–0.080 |
| [ |
|
| Natural death rate | 0.019–0.021 |
| [ |
MA methamphetamine